KiSSFLOW vs UiPath Studio comparison

KiSSFLOW and UiPath are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. KiSSFLOW is ranked #29, while UiPath is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.5. Additionally, 92% of KiSSFLOW users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

KiSSFLOW

Read 12 KiSSFLOW reviews

4,266 Views
1,706 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

UiPath Studio

Read 6 UiPath Studio reviews

1,231 Views
529 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

KiSSFLOW

UiPath Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between KiSSFLOW and UiPath Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed KiSSFLOW vs. UiPath Studio Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

KiSSFLOW vs. UiPath Studio

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

KiSSFLOW

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

29th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Performance Management (25th), Business Process Management (BPM) (35th), Rapid Application Development Software (28th)

UiPath Studio

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (6th)

Featured Reviews

Julius Jagdon

Business Tools at Motorola Solutions

The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver

When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user. For example, our RSN needs to approve the ticket first before it's moved to the next person rather than having them all grouped. It would be better if we could see all the tickets grouped at the same time.

Read full review

VijayBhallamudi

Senior Business Analyst at Flix

Citizen developers have automated finance processes and created reusable modules across entities

There are some weaknesses, though nothing on the top of my mind at the moment. From a process and OCR point of view, for example, we are currently doing a use case about e-invoicing. We feel the accuracy that the OCR provides from UiPath Studio was not as high as we had initially anticipated. We had to not go with that module that UiPath Studio offers. UiPath Studio has an a la carte mode where you can buy specific functionalities without having to buy the whole package. We decided to test out a few other tools in the market and bought a customized tool specifically for OCR purposes because UiPath Studio's accuracy was not as great. It comes more on a use case-to-use case basis. Certain use cases that we try show that certain functionalities could be improved, and there is definitely a scope for improvement. That being said, the functionalities that we bought UiPath Studio initially for work pretty well. We wanted a centralized automation hub, an Orchestrator, and maximum license utilization for the bots we were purchasing. They are basic, but at the same time, they are easy to use. The ease of use is one of the main reasons why we still favor UiPath Studio. The AI and OCR parts are something we are looking to explore more in the coming year, and that will probably give us more insights into the functionalities and their value. At the moment, we use Oracle as our ERP. We have not had much success integrating with Oracle so far. UiPath Studio offers a lot of customized integrations for SAP, but not much for Oracle Cloud. We had to leverage our internal ERP in-house team to build integrations. We used Oracle Cloud integrations rather than UiPath Studio integrations with respect to ERP. Every conference or event that UiPath Studio organizes, when we have a chance to speak with someone from UiPath Studio, we bring up Oracle Cloud integrations. I believe that in Europe and the US, Oracle Cloud is growing in usage, so we would appreciate more effort focused there. However, with Salesforce, we used a couple of cases with customer service in our company, and we integrated with it very smoothly without any blockers. At the moment, we have not explored AI and ML capabilities of UiPath Studio as much as we should have. We conducted a series of process discovery workshops in our company, and the use cases we received did not require AI or ML functionalities because they were core finance operations, and we did well with just the regular functionalities of UiPath Studio. We are still looking forward to finding a case where we could leverage AI and ML capabilities. We do not want to use AI functionalities just because we want to use them. It is more of a situation where we ask if it is needed, and we are still looking forward to finding a case that demands the need for AI functionalities or a nice-to-have feature. At the moment, we still have not used or explored those things of UiPath Studio.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."

"The most valuable feature is the performance."

"My advice to anybody who is considering KiSSFLOW is that it is easy to use and I recommend it."

"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."

"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."

"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."

"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."

"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."

More KiSSFLOW pros

"There are a lot of great things in UiPath Studio; whatever is required for the development is there, and I do not think I face any difficulty during the development of any use case from UiPath Studio's side."

"I have seen a return on investment because we have saved around one million dollars on a yearly basis with our 1,000 bots."

"Compared to other tools, UiPath Studio licensing cost is low."

"The fact that with UiPath Studio we can build reusable modules that we can use across automations has been specifically very useful to us as a company and team driving this project."

"UiPath Studio is good for automating business processes and repetitive tasks within my company."

"Right now we have it deployed, and it is dealing with about 50% of our document volume."

Cons

"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."

"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."

"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."

"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."

"The integration between forms should be made easier."

"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."

"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."

"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."

More KiSSFLOW cons

"In terms of improvement for UiPath Studio, while we are currently using the AI capability, I find that Copilot is not that reliable."

"Some of the recent upgraded versions, the package sometimes create problems, so that has to be tested first and then it should be available in UiPath Studio, because everybody wants to use the latest package, but sometimes when we are using the latest package, it creates problems."

"We feel the accuracy that the OCR provides from UiPath Studio was not as high as we had initially anticipated."

"We are not seeing improved ROI because the bigger chunks of use cases we have already addressed. When we take it down to the medium size, the cost of development and deployment is something which is prohibitive and it doesn't make a good financial business case."

"On the improving side, concerning costing, I am not sure because the cost of the new product is very high."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Kissflow's licensing cost is lower than other products. However, the contract has changed with the second version they have given us, which is the low-code one."

"The product costs $15 per user per month."

"Your company must subscribe to the solution if you create a business account."

"The license is very expensive."

"This is an affordable product and everything is included in the subscription."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

Performing Arts

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Studio?

I am satisfied with the current price for the product and overall licensing costs. Whatever price is given is provided by the client. We can definitely suggest the amount, and if the client is read...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Studio?

In terms of improvement for UiPath Studio, while we are currently using the AI capability, I find that Copilot is not that reliable. The responses we are getting are not at the desired level, so th...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for UiPath Studio?

My usual use cases for UiPath Studio are in banking and BFSI use cases. Currently, we have around 1,000 plus bots in production, effectively transitioning tasks from manual to automated processes. ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Apps vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 5% of the time

WorkflowGen vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 5% of the time

Camunda vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 5% of the time

Bizagi vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 5% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs KiSSFLOW

Compared 4% of the time

More KiSSFLOW Competitors

Dify vs UiPath Studio

Compared 28% of the time

Tungsten RPA vs UiPath Studio

Compared 21% of the time

Nintex RPA vs UiPath Studio

Compared 21% of the time

Appian vs UiPath Studio

Compared 13% of the time

Appian RPA vs UiPath Studio

Compared 11% of the time

More UiPath Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

KiSSFLOW

August 2026

Download KiSSFLOW product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Studio

July 2026

Download UiPath Studio product report

Overview

KiSSFLOW empowers organizations with a no-code platform for automating workflows and managing processes, providing robust integrations and ease of use to enhance individual and team productivity.

KiSSFLOW offers a comprehensive platform for process customization and automation with seamless virtual approvals, agile concept boards, and easy integration options. It supports rapid process modification and connects with applications like Google Drive, DocuSign, and Salesforce. Despite needing better integration with third-party tools and PDF functionalities, KiSSFLOW remains a valuable tool for standardizing business operations, managing HR tasks, and transitioning from paper to digital forms. The platform is widely used in HR, finance, and project management across education, sales, and nonprofit sectors, improving workflows and reducing administrative tasks.

What are KiSSFLOW's most important features?

Virtual Approvals: Ensures seamless process customization without losing control.
No-Code Setup: Makes customization accessible and user-friendly.
Drag-and-Drop System: Facilitates easy workflow design.
Robust Integration: Connects with apps like Salesforce and Google Drive.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Automation Efficiency: Saves time by transitioning manual processes to digital.
Process Standardization: Ensures consistency across tasks and departments.
Flexible Customization: Adapts to specific organizational needs.

In industries like ed-tech and NGOs, KiSSFLOW significantly aids in streamlining operations by automating workflows, managing projects, and tracking approvals for finance and purchasing. Its flexibility and ease of use encourage adoption across different fields, enhancing overall operational efficiency.

KiSSFLOW

UiPath Studio is a comprehensive tool for automating repetitive tasks. It's designed to enhance efficiency and productivity by providing a robust environment for building automation workflows quickly.

UiPath Studio offers a rich set of features catering to users looking to streamline operations through automation. Intuitive drag-and-drop functionality and seamless integration capabilities make it ideal for automating both simple and complex processes across diverse environments. Its detailed debugging tools and support for attended and unattended automation enable users to tailor their automation solutions to fit specific needs. By focusing on improving operational efficiency, UiPath Studio helps organizations to innovate while reducing manual efforts. It stands out for its adaptability and ease of implementation, fostering faster, more efficient process automation across industries.

What are the key features of UiPath Studio?

Drag-and-Drop Interface: Simplifies the automation design process, making it more accessible.
Comprehensive Activity Library: Offers pre-built activities for common processes, enhancing workflow creation.
Advanced Debugging Tools: Facilitates error identification and resolution to ensure reliable automation.
Attended and Unattended Modes: Allows flexibility in automation execution, catering to different organizational needs.
Integration with Third-Party Applications: Enhances workflow capabilities by connecting with external systems.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating UiPath Studio?

Increased Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks to free up valuable employee time.
Cost Savings: Reduces labor costs by leveraging automation to handle routine tasks.
Scalability: Adapts to growing demands and more complex workflows with ease.
Improved Accuracy: Minimizes errors that can occur in manual processes.
Faster Deployment: Quickly implements with minimal disruption, accelerating time-to-value.

UiPath Studio is implemented across multiple industries, including finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, to automate data entry, billing operations, and compliance checks. In finance, it streamlines transactions and reporting. In healthcare, it manages patient data and administrative tasks. Manufacturing firms apply it to handle inventory and quality control processes, ensuring consistency and precision.

UiPath

Sample Customers

KiSSFLOW has 1.3 million users and 10,000+ customers across 121 countries. The people who get the most out of KiSSFLOW are business leaders like department heads, senior managers, and process owners who want to automate repetitive processes. These people can set up and modify the application on their own. The interface is simple so that all the users in the organization can utilize it through the web application, mobile apps (iOS and Android), smart actions on Gmail, and email notifications. Notable companies are Royal Caribbean, Dominos, Motorola, Danone, The Telegraph, Michelin, and PepsiCo.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

KiSSFLOW vs. UiPath Studio

August 2026

Free Report: KiSSFLOW vs. UiPath Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about KiSSFLOW vs. UiPath Studio and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our KiSSFLOW vs. UiPath Studio report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.