Nintex RPA vs UiPath Studio comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Nintex and UiPath are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. Nintex is ranked #15, while UiPath is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5. Nintex holds a 2.4% mindshare in RPA, compared to UiPath’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Nintex RPA and UiPath Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex RPA vs. UiPath Studio Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex RPA vs. UiPath Studio

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Automation Anywhere is 4.9%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex RPA is 2.4%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Studio is 0.7%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Automation Anywhere	4.9%
UiPath Studio	0.7%
Nintex RPA	2.4%
Other	92.0%

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash

Management Consultant at Accenture

Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions

Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.

Read full review

JonathanNg

Global Automation Lead - Customer Operations at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Helped us identify areas where frontline staff aren't following standard procedures or using unexpected systems, giving us better insight into our end users' workflows

To analyze and make sense of the data generated by Kryon process discovery can be a lot of effort. It's not as automatic as some might think. It really depends on how many processes you have and how actively you use them. But the scalability aspect isn't necessarily about deployment or technical maintenance. It's really about how you analyze and gain insights from the data gathering. I'd rate the scalability a seven out of ten because the solution has been scaling well for a long time. It's very easy to deploy. But getting value out of it at scale can be a challenge, just like with any deployment. We use it mainly for process discovery. We actually proceed it from different teams. So, we have 15 licenses that we rotate with different people, actually through different teams. So, we do discovery for the online team; we gather the results after about two weeks to a month. We analyze those results, and then we deploy them again on the analytics team. We regularly deploy it to different teams. So, it's in constant use. It just runs on the systems through discovery mode most of the time.

Read full review

VijayBhallamudi

Senior Business Analyst at Flix

Citizen developers have automated finance processes and created reusable modules across entities

There are some weaknesses, though nothing on the top of my mind at the moment. From a process and OCR point of view, for example, we are currently doing a use case about e-invoicing. We feel the accuracy that the OCR provides from UiPath Studio was not as high as we had initially anticipated. We had to not go with that module that UiPath Studio offers. UiPath Studio has an a la carte mode where you can buy specific functionalities without having to buy the whole package. We decided to test out a few other tools in the market and bought a customized tool specifically for OCR purposes because UiPath Studio's accuracy was not as great. It comes more on a use case-to-use case basis. Certain use cases that we try show that certain functionalities could be improved, and there is definitely a scope for improvement. That being said, the functionalities that we bought UiPath Studio initially for work pretty well. We wanted a centralized automation hub, an Orchestrator, and maximum license utilization for the bots we were purchasing. They are basic, but at the same time, they are easy to use. The ease of use is one of the main reasons why we still favor UiPath Studio. The AI and OCR parts are something we are looking to explore more in the coming year, and that will probably give us more insights into the functionalities and their value. At the moment, we use Oracle as our ERP. We have not had much success integrating with Oracle so far. UiPath Studio offers a lot of customized integrations for SAP, but not much for Oracle Cloud. We had to leverage our internal ERP in-house team to build integrations. We used Oracle Cloud integrations rather than UiPath Studio integrations with respect to ERP. Every conference or event that UiPath Studio organizes, when we have a chance to speak with someone from UiPath Studio, we bring up Oracle Cloud integrations. I believe that in Europe and the US, Oracle Cloud is growing in usage, so we would appreciate more effort focused there. However, with Salesforce, we used a couple of cases with customer service in our company, and we integrated with it very smoothly without any blockers. At the moment, we have not explored AI and ML capabilities of UiPath Studio as much as we should have. We conducted a series of process discovery workshops in our company, and the use cases we received did not require AI or ML functionalities because they were core finance operations, and we did well with just the regular functionalities of UiPath Studio. We are still looking forward to finding a case where we could leverage AI and ML capabilities. We do not want to use AI functionalities just because we want to use them. It is more of a situation where we ask if it is needed, and we are still looking forward to finding a case that demands the need for AI functionalities or a nice-to-have feature. At the moment, we still have not used or explored those things of UiPath Studio.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What really helps RPA to grow is the cognitive part of it. That's where the product is really good. Initially, it started out as RPA, but now there is a cognitive aspect to it. That's a key value to it."

"It is very easy for anybody to learn."

"I'd say the most impactful and heavily or commonly used ability of v11 and A2019 has been the ability to integrate other code types and operations within the process."

"The whole suite of RPA modules that they have is very good. They have three environments in which you can do your automation. You have development, staging, and production environments. These are run by licenses as well, which is very good. There are a lot of ways of automating processes with this application."

"The most valuable feature of the platform right now for us is just getting the most out of the tool. When I first joined the company, we were on version 11, which is the on-premise version of Automation Anywhere. Getting over to the new cloud platform A360 has enabled us to get the most out of general RPA or robotic process automation."

"Since we can register multiple bot runners in one control room, and we can easily monitor and re-run bots when necessary, it is convenient for me."

"This product makes my life easier."

"Automation Anywhere can easily be adopted and learnt."

More Automation Anywhere pros

"Those 15,000 hours saved are a fantastic result and we're at a 99 percent success rate."

"As a business user, it's so easy to use. With the recording of the processes, we didn't need to hire a specific developer... we are able to build most of our processes without having to develop the actual development skillset... the simplicity is the biggest win."

"It has been a great value-add for us personally and easy to use."

"Kryon RPA is very stable - we've not had many disruptions, and the product is updated regularly."

"Attended automation has diverted 34 percent of training calls to our tech support centers."

"All our users have no technical background. But Kryon is really simple and intuitive. Our business adapted very quickly and easily. This is the main thing and it's why we love the system so much. It's why we are always trying to put more processes into the system and make more use cases: because of the simplicity and the intuitive nature of the system."

"I like Kryon RPA's ability to use automated and manual processes with any bot."

"The most valuable features for our organization are the automatic processes which save main power in the back office."

More Nintex RPA pros

"There are a lot of great things in UiPath Studio; whatever is required for the development is there, and I do not think I face any difficulty during the development of any use case from UiPath Studio's side."

"The fact that with UiPath Studio we can build reusable modules that we can use across automations has been specifically very useful to us as a company and team driving this project."

"UiPath Studio is good for automating business processes and repetitive tasks within my company."

"Right now we have it deployed, and it is dealing with about 50% of our document volume."

"Compared to other tools, UiPath Studio licensing cost is low."

"I have seen a return on investment because we have saved around one million dollars on a yearly basis with our 1,000 bots."

Cons

"We have a new feature share in Automation Anywhere, but it does not migrate automatically from the previous version to the new one."

"Automation Anywhere could improve its integration with Python and other programming languages."

"More structured and unstructured data collection will be a challenge. While we have the IQ Bot tool, the success rate at the beginning will be lower. It will be around 20 to 30 percent at the start because you need to train the bot at regular intervals. Of course, this depends on the data. This area could use be improvement."

"Automation Anywhere has some limitation with its integrations."

"It would be better to make it more user-friendly so that individuals with no experience can pick it up pretty quickly."

"Over the time that I've worked with Automation Anywhere, I have experienced downtime, crashes, or performance issues."

"As a business user, I would like to have a feature wherein the bot is run on demand, whenever an email with a specific keyword or whenever a specific pers sends an email to the bot's email address."

"The Image Recognition functionality should be enhanced to improve the accuracy of checkboxes."

More Automation Anywhere cons

"It would be better to have [upgrades] done automatically, like an application on your smartphone. Or even if done manually, the upgrade should just be "next, next, next," and it's upgraded, rather than making it a project to upgrade."

"Often, it's difficult to loop through a large data set unless the bot has access to the Excel file with specific settings and shortcodes."

"I would expect that in the first year there is no ROI. It has to be measured over three or five years."

"I would like to see a better OCR solution. That's the main thing: identifying unstructured data, like all paper documents and data from pictures."

"The product requires some more time in development. It still has some bugs and some things to work out. They're constantly releasing. They need to continue working out the general issues of using the product at scale, first and foremost."

"I’m not sure yet what I think about the stability of Kryon because we haven't been able to get things constantly running and working."

"Another major drawback is OCR. We are not able to read scanned documents correctly in a reliable way."

"Nintex RPA is not suitable for PDF automation."

More Nintex RPA cons

"We feel the accuracy that the OCR provides from UiPath Studio was not as high as we had initially anticipated."

"On the improving side, concerning costing, I am not sure because the cost of the new product is very high."

"In terms of improvement for UiPath Studio, while we are currently using the AI capability, I find that Copilot is not that reliable."

"Some of the recent upgraded versions, the package sometimes create problems, so that has to be tested first and then it should be available in UiPath Studio, because everybody wants to use the latest package, but sometimes when we are using the latest package, it creates problems."

"We are not seeing improved ROI because the bigger chunks of use cases we have already addressed. When we take it down to the medium size, the cost of development and deployment is something which is prohibitive and it doesn't make a good financial business case."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable and one can achieve ROI faster when compared to other tools."

"I think the solution's pricing is reasonable."

"The product starts at $10,000 and then it's up to you regarding how much you can consume."

"We brought onshore a lot of what we were doing offshore, saving our company close to $20 million."

"It's fine. However, I'm concerned with the credits in terms of the pricing for the AI models. It is understandable that the new ones are more expensive, but the base models, after doing the pricing conversion, cost about four to ten times as much as paying directly."

"We have seen about a 10 percent monetary savings."

"It's cheapest among the competition, although bargaining is a must."

"Regarding the price, licensing, and maintenance, Automation Anywhere provides its customers with its best and affordable value."

More Automation Anywhere pricing and cost advice

"Licensing costs are about $100,000 a year without any additional costs."

"The product has reasonable pricing."

"We have a yearly license. It's about $5,000 per year."

"We've more than broken even over on the license. Year to date, we are at $120,000 in savings."

"In addition to the standard licensing costs, there are manpower costs."

"Compared to its competitors, Kryon RPA's pricing is very competitive."

"The price is affordable."

"We're paying in the neighborhood of about $66,000 a year. The cost is fairly similar to its competitors' costs. It might have been a little bit more reasonable than the others, and that cost was with Process Discovery in addition."

More Nintex RPA pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

26%

University

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	162
Midsize Enterprise	86
Large Enterprise	565

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.

See all answers

Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries

We have found that Foxtrot (Now NintexRPA) is a very solid solution for IBM iSeries integration using the IBM ACS 525...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Studio?

I am satisfied with the current price for the product and overall licensing costs. Whatever price is given is provide...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Studio?

In terms of improvement for UiPath Studio, while we are currently using the AI capability, I find that Copilot is not...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for UiPath Studio?

My usual use cases for UiPath Studio are in banking and BFSI use cases. Currently, we have around 1,000 plus bots in ...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 10% of the time

Blue Prism vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 4% of the time

AutomationEdge vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 3% of the time

Appian vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

More Automation Anywhere Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Nintex RPA

Compared 9% of the time

Jacada Intelligent Agent Engagement vs Nintex RPA

Compared 5% of the time

Blue Prism vs Nintex RPA

Compared 4% of the time

NTT-AT WinActor vs Nintex RPA

Compared 4% of the time

Fortra's Automate vs Nintex RPA

Compared 3% of the time

More Nintex RPA Competitors

Dify vs UiPath Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Tungsten RPA vs UiPath Studio

Compared 13% of the time

Appian vs UiPath Studio

Compared 9% of the time

Appian RPA vs UiPath Studio

Compared 5% of the time

Laiye UiBot vs UiPath Studio

Compared 4% of the time

More UiPath Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automation Anywhere

October 2026

Download Automation Anywhere product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex RPA

October 2026

Download Nintex RPA product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Studio

October 2026

Download UiPath Studio product report

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)

Kryon RPA

No data available

Interactive Demo

Automation Anywhere

Demo not available

Nintex

Demo not available

UiPath

Overview

Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.

Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI features like process automation and Co-Pilot, streamlining complex workflows with minimal technical skills required. Users benefit from robust integration capabilities, which facilitate seamless interaction with multiple systems. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as user-friendliness for beginners, stability, flexible licensing, and enhanced OCR functionality. Organizations in sectors such as banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare gain from the improved operational efficiency and ROI Automation Anywhere offers.

What are the important features of Automation Anywhere?

Ease of Use: Simplifies automation tasks with a user-centric interface.
Robust Connectivity: Provides seamless integration with multiple systems.
GenAI-Driven Document Automation: Leverages AI to automate document management.
Process Automation & Co-Pilot: Enhances workflow automation with advanced AI.
Cloud-Native Platform: Enables rapid deployment and integration.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces manual processing time.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases overall operational costs by automating tasks.
Productivity Enhancement: Streamlines workflows with AI-driven tools.
Improved Integration: Enhances ability to work with multiple systems.
Scalability: Supports growth with a flexible cloud-native architecture.

In the insurance industry, Automation Anywhere is utilized for automating processes such as enrollment management and compliance checks. Its applications extend to supply chain management, financial transactions, and business performance monitoring across sectors like banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare, helping organizations to automate routine tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

Automation Anywhere

Nintex RPA enhances automation efforts with user-friendly features, supporting both technical and non-technical teams by simplifying tasks and improving efficiency. Its capabilities extend across various platforms, providing a scalable and secure environment for effective task management.

Focusing on automation, Nintex RPA offers solutions for integrating Excel, emails, and databases to reduce manual effort significantly. Known for its intuitive design and advanced security, it facilitates customization and deployment across platforms. Users note the ease of recording actions, while scalability meets the needs of diverse industries including banking and finance. However, some enhancements like object recognition improvements and better OCR for unstructured data could refine its usability. Challenges in integration with platforms like Google Docs and ServiceNow, coupled with desires for better training support and AI capabilities, highlight areas for potential growth.

What are the key features of Nintex RPA?

Recording User Actions: Simplifies task automation via direct recording.
Drag-and-Drop Interface: Offers an intuitive way to design workflows.
Cross-Platform Integration: Facilitates seamless connectivity across systems.
Scalable Automation: Grows with business demands without complexity.
Advanced Security: Ensures protection of sensitive data during automation.
Task Mining: Identifies and enhances process efficiency.

What benefits can users expect in terms of ROI?

Reduced Manual Effort: Automates repetitive tasks to save time.
Enhanced Efficiency: Improves productivity by streamlining processes.
Cost-Effective: Provides an economical solution with competitive pricing.
Reliability: Offers consistent and accurate task execution.
Customization Ease: Simple modifications cater to changing business needs.

In industries like banking, insurance, and finance, Nintex RPA is employed to streamline operations such as SAP and Excel processes, customer account management, and data extraction. Its capabilities in routine automation, including anti-money laundering procedures and onboarding, enable businesses to reduce manual intervention while supporting both attended and unattended workflows.

Nintex

UiPath Studio is a comprehensive tool for automating repetitive tasks. It's designed to enhance efficiency and productivity by providing a robust environment for building automation workflows quickly.

UiPath Studio offers a rich set of features catering to users looking to streamline operations through automation. Intuitive drag-and-drop functionality and seamless integration capabilities make it ideal for automating both simple and complex processes across diverse environments. Its detailed debugging tools and support for attended and unattended automation enable users to tailor their automation solutions to fit specific needs. By focusing on improving operational efficiency, UiPath Studio helps organizations to innovate while reducing manual efforts. It stands out for its adaptability and ease of implementation, fostering faster, more efficient process automation across industries.

What are the key features of UiPath Studio?

Drag-and-Drop Interface: Simplifies the automation design process, making it more accessible.
Comprehensive Activity Library: Offers pre-built activities for common processes, enhancing workflow creation.
Advanced Debugging Tools: Facilitates error identification and resolution to ensure reliable automation.
Attended and Unattended Modes: Allows flexibility in automation execution, catering to different organizational needs.
Integration with Third-Party Applications: Enhances workflow capabilities by connecting with external systems.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating UiPath Studio?

Increased Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks to free up valuable employee time.
Cost Savings: Reduces labor costs by leveraging automation to handle routine tasks.
Scalability: Adapts to growing demands and more complex workflows with ease.
Improved Accuracy: Minimizes errors that can occur in manual processes.
Faster Deployment: Quickly implements with minimal disruption, accelerating time-to-value.

UiPath Studio is implemented across multiple industries, including finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, to automate data entry, billing operations, and compliance checks. In finance, it streamlines transactions and reporting. In healthcare, it manages patient data and administrative tasks. Manufacturing firms apply it to handle inventory and quality control processes, ensuring consistency and precision.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics

Amazon, Audi, Chevron, Toyota, Uber, Walmart

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Nintex RPA vs. UiPath Studio

September 2026

Free Report: Nintex RPA vs. UiPath Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex RPA vs. UiPath Studio and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex RPA vs. UiPath Studio report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.