KeyCloud Backup and Recovery vs Quorum OnQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between KeyCloud Backup and Recovery and Quorum OnQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Commvault, Zerto and others in Cloud Backup.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Backup Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most important features is that it provides consistent cloud-based backup."

More KeyCloud Backup and Recovery Pros →

"From a disaster-recovery point of view, one of the things I really like is that I can test the virtual copy of the physical server on a test network and compare the servers side-by-side, without interfering with the production network. So I can see and make sure that the latest copy of the server is the physical copy of the server, without interfering with production.""I have used the BMR (Bare Metal Restore) in several emergencies and it has absolutely saved my bacon.""The solution is very cost effective.""The most useful feature is the one-click recovery.""Quorum OnQ has taken the guesswork out of backup/recovery and disaster recovery.""The most valuable feature is spinning up a ready-to-go VM in a test or production environment that is based on a backup stored on the Quorum device.""One of the most valuable features was the usability, since many of the features were very straightforward. The backup and restoration process was also very fast. Although we weren't able to fully test the scenarios, one of the features was that we could have it restored on a remote site. However, since we were on-prem, we weren't able to test the remote site restoration.""The most valuable feature of Quorum OnQ is quick recovery."

More Quorum OnQ Pros →

Cons
"We backup a lot of information in a 24-hour period. It works fine. But there's always room for improvement on that."

More KeyCloud Backup and Recovery Cons →

"I would like to see iSCSI support added so that NAS storage servers could be protected. We heavily utilize NAS storage and the risk there is minimal backup options. Currently, we are backing up NAS to NAS which is costly and slow. Being able to integrate NAS server backup would be the last item on my Quorum bucket list.""I would really like it if they followed comparable products from other vendors and had an option where you could offload to tape. I know it sounds incredibly antiquated, but the benefit I see is that there would be a better air gap than you have with backing up to an online source.""The price is high and could be more competitive.""They need integration with other platforms.""We found that some of the live SQL databases we were backing up would be inconsistent when we would restore them.""There seems to be a lack of technicians. Sometimes they are very busy and I don't hear back for a day or two. The technicians they have are great. They are fantastic, but it seems difficult, at times, to get in contact with anyone.""Better integration with cloud-based solutions like Azure and Office 365 is needed.""The user interface needs to be improved."

More Quorum OnQ Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We have never questioned whether it is worth it because it so obviously is a great value."
  • "When we first got the Quorum the licensing was different."
  • "The cost is higher than other software and services, but it is an absolute must-have."
  • "The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years."
  • "The pricing is about $1,400 a month. It's a little bit on the higher side. But it's one of those situations where time is valuable for me. So if it costs a little bit more money for me to have a solution that just works and requires less of my day-to-day management, I'm willing to pay a little bit more."
  • "The initial expenditure for us was a little under $40,000 for the recent renewal. For the first three years after that, other than electricity, there's no cost. After that, their support contract has to be renewed annually. We spent close to $6,000, between the two offices, for support."
  • "When we quote the price of Quorum to customers, they find it expensive."
  • "The upfront cost of purchasing a license for the hardware is quite steep."
  • More Quorum OnQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The solution is very cost effective.
    Top Answer:The solution’s pricing is economical. The customers have their own flexibility. Customers have to pay for an annual license, and the licensing has a subscription model as well as a perpetual license… more »
    Top Answer:The subscription must be affordable..
    Ranking
    62nd
    out of 113 in Cloud Backup
    Views
    105
    Comparisons
    67
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    30th
    out of 113 in Cloud Backup
    Views
    787
    Comparisons
    389
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    349
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    KeyCloud BRaaS
    OnQ
    Learn More
    Overview

    KeyCloud Backup and Recovery is a fully managed backup and recovery solution for mission critical data. KeyCloud includes the software, offsite storage and support – all in an enterprise-grade cloud environment that provides massive scalability, and guaranteed restorability. With KeyCloud, you can rest assured your most important data will always be protected and available, without the hassle of managing it yourself.

    Quorum onQ is the global leader in 1-click instant recovery, providing full immediate recovery of your critical systems after any storage, system or site failure. It does this by automatically maintaining up-to-date, ready-to-run virtual machine clones of your physical and virtual servers stored on a dedicated appliance – clones that will transparently take over for failed servers within minutes.

    Sample Customers
    Flexi-Van
    LCL Bulk Transport
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Logistics Company17%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Individual & Family Service11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business86%
    Large Enterprise14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Backup
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Commvault, Zerto and others in Cloud Backup. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    KeyCloud Backup and Recovery is ranked 62nd in Cloud Backup while Quorum OnQ is ranked 30th in Cloud Backup with 20 reviews. KeyCloud Backup and Recovery is rated 10.0, while Quorum OnQ is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of KeyCloud Backup and Recovery writes "Simply provides single-vendor, consistent cloud-based backup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quorum OnQ writes "Took us just hours to do a complete server restore, with minimal downtime". KeyCloud Backup and Recovery is most compared with , whereas Quorum OnQ is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect and Acronis Cyber Protect.

    See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.