Kentik vs TruView comparison

Kentik and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Kentik is ranked #29 with an average rating of 9.0, while NETSCOUT is ranked #70 with an average rating of 5.0. Kentik holds a 1.8% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Kentik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Kentik

Read 16 Kentik reviews

3,784 Views
3,368 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TruView

Read 17 TruView reviews

967 Views
909 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kentik

TruView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

TruView and Kentik are competing in the domain of network performance monitoring and management. Kentik seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features that justify its cost.

Features: TruView offers integrated network visibility, quick problem-solving capabilities, and extensive traffic analysis. Kentik provides robust network traffic analytics, extensive integration capabilities, and predictive insights.

Room for Improvement: TruView could enhance its scalability, cloud deployment options, and integration flexibility. Kentik may improve its pricing model, real-time analytics capabilities, and support availability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TruView supports straightforward deployment with strong customer support, facilitating quick implementation. Kentik offers cloud-based deployment, emphasizing flexibility and ease of access.

Pricing and ROI: TruView is characterized by its competitive pricing model and quick ROI. Kentik requires a higher initial investment, but this is balanced by its long-term value and robust analytics capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Kentik vs. TruView Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Kentik vs. TruView

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Kentik

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

29th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (16th)

TruView

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

70th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Kentik is 1.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TruView is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kentik	1.8%
TruView	0.4%
Other	97.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Shubham-Saxena

Network Engineer III at Fortanix

Integrating synthetic tests and network monitoring enhances traffic pattern visualization

The Kentik support team is good. If you want me to rate them on a scale, I would give them eight. I had a call with the Kentik support team for fifteen minutes, so I'm going to give them eight for now. The reason for giving them an eight is that they are good and address our issues. They have monthly calls and discuss the product roadmap with us, including what is needed and what is not. However, when we are working on some real issues with Kentik, I sometimes feel there's a delay due to the busyness of their teams. We faced some outages and were not able to get the desired results from Kentik tools, so that took a little time to resolve.

Read full review

Zotex

Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Monitors traffic, analyzes flows, tracks packets, and measures bandwidth across our network

We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Collecting that data and having those metrics first-hand, in real-time, allows us to make an educated decision, versus an uneducated guess."

"We're pretty happy with the API functionality. It's web, and it's very simple to set up queries. It has served us well and you don't need to be an expert on the API or the product to set these things up."

"The most important feature is cybersecurity."

"The drill-down into detailed views of network activity helps to quickly pinpoint locations and causes. All the information is there."

"Honestly, it is one of those products that I would suggest to almost any network operator."

"The most valuable feature is being able to pull traffic patterns; to and from destinations. We're able to understand where our traffic is going, our top talkers from an AS set, as well as where our traffic's coming from."

"Overall, I would give Kentik nine out of ten stars."

"I really love the Data Explorer. I use it all the time to go in and craft exactly what I need to see. I'm able to then take that story and explain it to the executives. I've done that a couple of times and it is helpful."

More Kentik pros

"TruView takes only minutes to install."

"We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights."

"Visual TruView helped our network team respond to potential issues before they became larger ones."

"It gives us the ability to determine the root of a problem or a network, whether it's on the network side, the database, application server, or server infrastructure."

"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."

Cons

"We faced some outages and were not able to get the desired results from Kentik tools, so that took a little time to resolve."

"I've checked out the V4 version of the interface and it's still a little bit clunky for me to use."

"I would like to see them explore the area of cost analysis."

"They're moving more in a direction where they are saying, "Hey, here's information that you may be interested in or may a need," before the question has to explicitly be asked. Continuing to move in that direction would be a good thing."

"There is room for improvement around the usability of the API. It's a hugely complex task to call it and you need a lot of backing to be able to do it."

"Version 4 of the platform is good and going in the right direction."

"There is room for improvement around the usability of the API. It's a hugely complex task to call it and you need a lot of backing to be able to do it. I should say, as someone who's not in networking, maybe it's easier for people who are in networking, but for me that one part is not very user-friendly."

"Sometimes it's difficult to order the dimensions correctly when trying to make Sankey flow diagrams."

More Kentik cons

"Whilst Citrix could be handled better like their nGenius product line (which does an excellent job) it copes with the centralised type of deployment TruView covers."

"I can't give them quite a 10, because from time to time, I'll work with the folks who, not that they're not good, but there are some who are just phenomenal."

"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."

"We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have an annual contract with Kentik that we renew each year for a set number of licenses. We also have some burstable licenses which we can spin up and spin down, and those are paid as they are used."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

20%

Construction Company

11%

Transportation Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kentik?

I would say Kentik's pricing is not cheap. From my perspective as part of the technical team, I would not categorize it as expensive, but I know it is not cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kentik?

There's always room for improvements and better relations when using any kind of product. We faced some issues with Kentik UI and alerting, which we asked them to fix, and they succeeded. They have...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kentik?

We are using Kentik mostly for synthetic tests, and from one last year, network monitoring as well. We are using it for inter DC BGP tests and server monitoring as well.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TruView?

We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TruView?

We use TruView to monitor traffic, analyze flows, track packets, and measure bandwidth across our network. This helps us gain insights into our network's performance, detect any anomalies or attack...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TruView?

Overall, I would rate TruView a nine out of ten. I would recommend it for mid-sized organizations, particularly those with fewer than two thousand people, as it offers flexible licensing without de...

See all answers

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs Kentik

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

DX Spectrum vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

LibreNMS vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

More Kentik Competitors

OmniPeek vs TruView

Compared 14% of the time

LiveNX vs TruView

Compared 13% of the time

ClearSight Analyzer vs TruView

Compared 13% of the time

PingPlotter vs TruView

Compared 11% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs TruView

Compared 10% of the time

More TruView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Kentik

March 2026

Download Kentik product report

Buyer's Guide

TruView

March 2026

Download TruView product report

Overview

Kentik's AIOps Network Traffic Intelligence platform unifies network operations, performance, security, and business intelligence.

With a purpose-built big data engine delivered as public or private SaaS, Kentik captures a high-resolution view of actual network traffic data and enriches it with critical application and business data, so every network event or analysis can be tied to revenue & costs, customer & user experience, performance & risk.

Kentik

Visual TruView by Fluke Networks is a unified solution for Application Aware Network Performance Management (AANPM). TruView embeds the most important data sources such as packet, transaction, NetFlow/IPFIX, and SNMP to present analytics in a time-correlated single dashboard view. These correlated views help you quickly see how well the infrastructure is transporting applications and how well those applications are performing in the context of end-user experience. And, TruView’s integrated 10 Gbps full line rate stream-to-disk packet capture ensures you’ll never miss an important event again.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Pandora, Yelp, Neustar, Box, University of Washington, Zoom, Tata, and Cogent.

FloraHolland, Miami-Dade Public Library System, Southeastern Freight Lines, Valdosta State University, Everett Clinic, Bioreference, Key Information Systems, ACER, Odeabank A.S.

Buyer's Guide

Kentik vs. TruView

March 2026

Free Report: Kentik vs. TruView

Find out what your peers are saying about Kentik vs. TruView and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Kentik vs. TruView report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.