Kemp LoadMaster and LoadBalancer Enterprise both compete in the load balancing solutions category. Users generally find Kemp LoadMaster to have the upper hand because of its pricing, support, and integration with Microsoft applications, although LoadBalancer Enterprise is preferred for select features.
Features: Kemp LoadMaster is noted for easy configuration, ready-made templates for applications like Skype for Business, and seamless Azure integration, providing stability and security features like WAF and IPS. LoadBalancer Enterprise impresses with strong load balancing capabilities but lacks specialized templates and security integrations offered by Kemp LoadMaster.
Room for Improvement: Kemp LoadMaster could improve its documentation and UI to simplify advanced features, providing more intuitive tooltips and real-time traffic visibility. LoadBalancer Enterprise requires better support for business applications and a modern GUI, with users wanting better documentation and enhanced reporting.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kemp LoadMaster is praised for straightforward on-premises deployment and excellent technical support, noted for rapid and helpful responses, contributing to high satisfaction. LoadBalancer Enterprise offers strong support but is less used in private cloud environments, with Kemp's customer service often highlighted as superior.
Pricing and ROI: Kemp LoadMaster is preferred for its cost-effectiveness, offering competitive pricing that significantly contributes to ROI, with flexible licensing and trial options making it attractive. LoadBalancer Enterprise's pricing is more demanding, although it provides savings when transitioning from other solutions. Kemp's low cost compared to high value consistently yields positive ROI, appealing to cost-conscious businesses.
There are very lesser downtimes in terms of my overall data, including software deployment, development, and testing cycles.
One of the reasons why we went for LoadBalancer Enterprise is because of losing revenue when services are not available.
We have not received technical support from Kemp LoadMaster without a license.
I can expect a response within fifteen to twenty minutes after I put in a ticket to release the license.
They respond immediately when we do reach out.
They need to improve their customer service and response time.
Kemp LoadMaster is a scalable solution.
LoadBalancer Enterprise is easy to scale, maintain, and modify, which makes adding or removing servers a simple process.
LoadBalancer Enterprise ensures that it distributes the load properly so that the system is not broken.
LoadBalancer Enterprise's scalability is good.
With the license purchase afterwards, if it expires, it begins dropping the HTTP traffic, also the DNS traffic.
The regular health checks that LoadBalancer Enterprise performs using regular Jenkins jobs utilize all the functionalities of LoadBalancer Enterprise to make sure everything is working perfectly according to my design.
In 90% to 99% of cases, I can say it is seamless.
After that, they said if it was good, we could purchase the license, and while we found it very good, the license cost was too high.
Documentation needs improvement because having information is essential for working with advanced configurations.
LoadBalancer Enterprise could work more on content caching by bypassing the back-end server more often and making the cache more accessible so that it gives better and more robust results.
Deeper RFC compliance checks and Layer 7 inspections can help improve security aspects.
The setup cost is cheap and licensing is also reasonably priced.
Regarding the pricing of LoadBalancer Enterprise, I only pay for a license, and whatever license I use doesn't require the same CAPEX investment as physical hardware.
With the licensing and setup cost, I think it is pretty good.
We had some issues in patching management, so we deployed this product for virtual patching, the IPS rule, and it gives us very good results because we have very critical servers.
Now, we achieve about 99% availability across all servers thanks to the health check feature in the load balancer.
LoadBalancer Enterprise simulates production traffic profiles by using a realistic traffic generator that models different requests and transaction mixes such as reads and writes, leveraging replay traffic from sanitized production traces whenever possible.
LoadBalancer Enterprise has impacted my organization positively by making our applications and services available to all users across the globe.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| LoadBalancer Enterprise | 4.9% |
| Kemp LoadMaster | 5.9% |
| Other | 89.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 24 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
Kemp LoadMaster enhances server performance by providing secure, intuitive load balancing solutions with easy deployment. It supports high availability, integrates seamlessly with IT infrastructure, and ensures optimal traffic distribution for critical applications.
Kemp LoadMaster is known for its ease of use and high-level security capabilities, making it ideal for managing multiple servers. Its intuitive interface simplifies configuration for load balancing and reverse proxy across multi-site Exchange, while the Edge Security Pack distinguishes between critical infrastructure and public internet. Supporting seamless service continuity and effective traffic distribution, it significantly boosts server performance through SSL offloading and intelligent monitoring. However, improvements are desired in stability and reporting, as well as in security features such as a robust Web Application Firewall and more intuitive logging and monitoring.
What are Kemp LoadMaster's Key Features?Kemp LoadMaster is implemented across industries that require robust IT infrastructure management. Organizations use it for load balancing in Exchange environments, securing web servers, and maintaining high availability for public sector services. It supports applications like RDP, SQL, DNS, SharePoint, Citrix, and VoIP, ensuring security and high performance.
LoadBalancer Enterprise offers a reliable, high-availability solution designed for efficient load distribution and a user-friendly interface, catering to teams with foundational network expertise.
LoadBalancer Enterprise enhances network performance through effective traffic routing, monitoring, and high availability. Users benefit from SSL termination with SNI and Layer 7 load balancing, ensuring seamless connections with reduced complexity compared to alternatives. While known for its user-friendly approach, improvements in configuration simplicity, scalable hardware upgrades, and enhanced notification systems are often discussed for better user experience. Additional demands include HTTP API access, automated configuration backups, DNS load balancing, and enhanced graphing data capabilities. Competitive pricing and heightened security for sensitive data are frequently requested. Interface refresh issues and Microsoft compatibility are noted among users, who deploy it for SSL/HTTP traffic management, redundancy, failover capabilities, web filtering, and cloud migration support.
What are LoadBalancer Enterprise's key features?LoadBalancer Enterprise is implemented across industries for managing SSL/HTTP traffic, enhancing network reliability, and providing failover capabilities. It supports web filtering, balances Exchange and application servers, facilitates cloud migration, and manages multiple ISP lines for optimal traffic distribution across web applications and services, including SIP provisioning. Industries also use it for enhancing security with web application firewalls, DNS sharing, and application publishing.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
