


Logpoint and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response are key players in the cybersecurity market. Kaspersky may have the upper hand due to its emphasis on robust threat detection and network security.
Features: Logpoint is known for its strong dashboards, search and report facilities, and integration with third-party SIEMs. It stands out with quick parser creation for diverse log formats and AI technology such as UEBA for endpoint monitoring. In contrast, Kaspersky excels in threat prevention and device control, with a high detection rate across networks and devices. It integrates endpoint protection effortlessly and enhances detection with machine learning capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Logpoint could improve its support services for user behavior analytics and provide better documentation and network visualization capabilities. Users have expressed a need for enhanced incident response and diverse log handling. Kaspersky users suggest improvements in local support, patch management, and user interface, along with better integration capabilities and communication between endpoints and servers.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Logpoint is mostly available as an on-premises solution, with some reports highlighting complex deployment and technical support challenges, especially at the L1 level. Kaspersky offers more deployment flexibility, including hybrid cloud options, and is generally praised for its responsive support, though some note slower response times and challenges with complex technical issues.
Pricing and ROI: Logpoint features a predictable pricing model based on fixed costs, adding value with discount offerings for NGOs and the public sector. Kaspersky, though considered expensive due to its advanced features, is seen as cost-effective with competitive pricing. Both are rated well for ROI, with Logpoint potentially yielding up to a 40% return, particularly in compliance and security posture enhancement.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
Logpoint's customer support is not sufficient with only one engineer in the US.
The technical support for Logpoint is very good, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
I recommend a submission to Logpoint because I worked with it before.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
It is web-based and accommodates the expansion of our organization.
Logpoint is scalable and capable of expanding.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR is stable, offering high quality and reliable performance.
I have received reports indicating glitches and downtimes with Logpoint.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response stops certain things. However, it does not take me to the file, and it is not user-friendly.
Dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.
Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not.
Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Cortex XDR is perceived as expensive by some customers, yet offers dynamic pricing.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is cheap.
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
The main network is being monitored through the firewall at that level.
The UEBA enables us to monitor at the device level, and SOAR provides playbooks and templates that we can modify and incorporate into the platform.
It effectively facilitates logging and log storage and assists in security event management by ingesting security events.
The most valuable feature, which is endpoint security, is included in Logpoint, and an extra feature is the integration.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.4% |
| Logpoint | 1.0% |
| Kaspersky Next XDR Expert | 1.0% |
| Other | 94.6% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 47 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 20 |
| Large Enterprise | 51 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response integrates antivirus, threat response, and EDR with high detection rates, behavior detection, and device control. It supports centralized management for seamless operation across remote and on-premise servers.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response offers a robust platform featuring automated responses, advanced reporting, and customizable policies. Users appreciate its lightweight agent and compatibility, though many report issues with stability and resource intensity. While effective in malware detection and incident response, challenges remain in configuration, integration, and efficient patch management. Zero-day detection and cloud version stability have room for improvement. However, its capabilities make it highly recommended in regions like Pakistan.
What are the key features of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?In industries prioritizing security, such as finance and healthcare, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response aids in threat hunting and behavior analysis. It integrates with SIEM systems, allowing precise encryption, targeted attack protection, and device management. Deployed on servers, workstations, and mobile devices, it's particularly esteemed in areas like Pakistan for its robust capabilities.
Logpoint offers a robust SIEM system tailored for compliance with regulations like PCI DSS and GDPR, enhancing security monitoring and enabling efficient incident response.
Logpoint strengthens cybersecurity by offering essential tools for log collection, security monitoring, and forensic analysis. Its features include an intuitive dashboard, a powerful correlation engine, and extensive third-party integrations, making it a versatile asset for security operations centers. Despite its advantages, areas for improvement include ransomware protection, cloud-native deployment, and more flexible pricing. Improvements in features like SOAR and UEBA functionality can boost its competitiveness.
What are the most important features of Logpoint?Many organizations utilize Logpoint across industries as part of their security infrastructure. It supports standard compliance, orchestrating incident responses and security threat monitoring. Logpoint empowers businesses by integrating and correlating security data, improving cybersecurity posture in varied environments.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.