Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiEDR
Sponsored
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
12th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kaspersky Endpoint Detectio...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
22nd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Symantec Endpoint Detection...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
24th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2166780 - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 10, 2024
Offers behavior analysis, improved our endpoint security posture but a lot of false positives where things are incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow
I would like to improve the integration process because a big selling point was the ease of integration within the Fortinet ecosystem. I would expect more built-in collaboration to allow for easier threat mitigation across Fortinet systems. The strength of FortiEDR lies in its overall ability to protect us from new threats. We have encountered issues with it as well. We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team. I would like to see improved heuristics so the system better understands what's legitimate and doesn't keep blocking it after minor updates.
WC
Apr 1, 2024
Convenient and provides effective security solutions
Kaspersky EDR enhances response capabilities by capturing malware or problematic websites on endpoints and providing alerts for quick action to resolve issues. Kaspersky EDR offers features for threat hunting and vulnerability scanning on endpoints. It identifies unapplied security patches and provides a reporting tool for managing patch deployments efficiently. Kaspersky EDR offers good integration capabilities, particularly with services like Office 365, which is beneficial for our organization. However, there might be some limitations when integrating with other tools such as NetSuite and Monday.com. Improving integration with tools like SolarWinds could enhance overall cybersecurity management. Looking ahead, prioritizing integration with cloud services would be advantageous as organizations increasingly rely on cloud-based solutions. I would recommend Kaspersky EDR, especially for organizations operating in the China market. It is a convenient tool that provides effective security solutions, particularly helpful in addressing firewall issues commonly faced in the Chinese market. However, for companies outside of China not facing similar market restrictions, it might be good to consider other solutions as well. Overall, I would rate Kaspersky EDR as a seven out of ten. It is a useful choice for our organization, although not perfect. It requires a certain skill set to manage security nodes effectively. However, it is relatively easy to use compared to other EDR tools, making it a safer option for less experienced users.
Arunkumar MV - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 27, 2024
Outdated, lacks add-on features, and the interface has many issues
I use the solution to detect threats The security is good. Symantec is a dead product. The product does not have any add-on features. The interface has many issues. There is no proper KB article to fix the error. I have been using the solution for five years. The solution is easy to install.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The stability is very good."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"We have a concept of working from home. Most endpoints are not in the domain. It is our first line of defense. While we had Kaspersky deployed, it gave good insight into the upcoming challenge or threat."
"The product is integrated with endpoint protection. We don't have to implement a separate technology. It provides visibility over the endpoints."
"The tool is easy to use."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"From my point of view, one of the best aspects of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is its high detection rate, which surpasses many other solutions. Its valuable features include behavior detection, threat prevention, device control, adaptive anomaly control, and centralized protection detection."
"One of the good features is the provider's Faulting capability. If any of our systems detect malware, we can check the behavior of the malware by sending it to Kaspersky's sandbox environment. This helps us assess how destructive the malware is. After analyzing it, we can create use cases and protection measures based on that behavior. So, this is the best feature of Kaspersky."
"It is a stable solution...It is a very scalable solution."
"The advanced detection features are valuable."
"It is very simple to use."
"The pricing is good."
"It is mostly used for malware detection and antivirus purposes."
"The most valuable features of the solution are that it is easy to use and has good support."
"A great feature of this solution is that it is very well-integrated with antivirus software. Other ADR solutions are implemented as single technologies and are not integrated with the provider, but Symantec offers AV plus ADR."
"The most valuable features are that it is easy to connect and global settings are good."
"The setup is quite easy."
"The security is good."
 

Cons

"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The support needs improvement."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"Enhancing user-friendliness should be a priority."
"I want to be able to use the product as a patch management tool for my endpoints since it is an area that is not working effectively for me."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response needs vast resources on the central node. Not all maintenance tasks are in the GUI, so we often use commands. The lack of documentation for these processes means we frequently reach out to support, open tickets, and run complex CLI commands. It's not the most straightforward process. It should also improve stability."
"The solution must provide better security."
"Incorporating an AI protection tool with the capability to detect and prevent zero-day threats, particularly those with a five-star rating in terms of severity would be beneficial."
"There is room for improvement in the support."
"There are certain shortcomings with the UI of the solution. The UI is not at all user-friendly."
"The main issue was compatibility with the cloud itself. The CPU usage immediately spiked, causing the machines to hang and sometimes even forcing server or computer restarts."
"Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response could improve the reporting. It is very difficult to create reports from the user interface."
"They do need to minimize the number of agents installed on a server."
"They need to improve their cloud presence."
"The interface has many issues."
"A significant deterioration in customer support."
"The GUI could be better."
"It would be beneficial to have more integration and compatibility with other platforms."
"Its UI could be more user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We got a good deal on licensing, so it is in the competitive range."
"It's moderately priced, neither cheap nor expensive."
"Fortinet FortiEDR is available at a very competitive price compared to the other products in the market."
"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"Fortinet FortiEDR has a yearly subscription."
"There are no issues with the pricing."
"The pricing is typical for enterprises and fairly priced."
"Offered at a high price"
"I rate the solution's pricing model a seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"The product is cheap."
"The pricing falls within the average range."
"The tool's pricing was high during the last renewal."
"Yearly payments are to be made toward the licensing costs of the solution."
"The solution is not cheap, but it is not expensive."
"It is cost-effective in terms of services and features compared to other more expensive EDR solutions like CrowdStrike and Trend Micro."
"The tool's pricing is reasonable."
"Compared to the tools of competitors, Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is a cheaply priced product."
"The product is cheap."
"Of late, because of the Broadcom purchase, its price has been increasing."
"Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is expensive."
"It's a yearly subscription."
"We are satisfied with the pricing."
"The price is reasonable."
"It is an expensive solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Retailer
19%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Healthcare Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Computer Software Company
15%
Retailer
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Fortinet's FortiEDR and FortiClient?
I suggest Fortinet’s FortiEDR over FortiClient for several reasons. For starters, FortiEDR guarantees solid protectio...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiEDR?
We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiEDR?
The pricing of the solution is on the high end compared to its offerings and capabilities.
What do you like most about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?
Kaspersky EDR offers automated response capabilities, enhancing efficiency by enabling quick investigation and respon...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?
We generally get a license for 36 months. The solution is not cheap, but it is not expensive.
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response?
The solution must provide better security. The performance can be improved.
 

Also Known As

enSilo, FortiEDR
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Financial, Healthcare, Legal, Technology, Enterprise, Manufacturing ... 
Information Not Available
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.