We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Jenzabar JICS vs Microsoft Dynamics NAV comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, Microsoft and others in ERP. Updated: January 2022.
563,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The first time we tried to buy the newest version, it was expensive."
  • "I have some subscription-based customer and a few customers who have perpetual licenses that hosted the application on the cloud."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "I think the pricing is the best; it's cost effective for sure."
  • "Microsoft Dynamics NAV has a pay-as-you-use payment model."
  • "NAV might be a little pricey for a small or medium-sized company, but all the solutions out there are."
  • "The cost is one of the benefits. If you don't want to go for the full-blown finance and operations, the pricing model is a lot cheaper and has now switched to being based on a per-user subscription. So, if it's on cloud, you now have an expense instead of a large CapEx. If it's on-prem, you obviously still have to continue with the licensing model that they have, but if you compare the features and functionality, in terms of the price that you pay, I find it's better than other products. My answer on the pricing would be slightly different, depending on the country you're in and the return on investment, based on the size of the company. It's well-priced internationally. I think the new model is priced even better because it's now subscription-based and, if you go for cloud, the return on investment is a lot quicker and if it's expense, you can cap it. If you do take the on-prem version, the licensing is still priced as what it used to be, so that would depend on what country you are in."
  • More Microsoft Dynamics NAV Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
    563,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer: 
    Microsoft Dynamics NAV is brilliant and it's a different segment when comparing it with Dynamics AX. Dynamics AX is a larger product with much more features and it's aimed at a different segment of… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Microsoft Dynamics NAV has a pay-as-you-use payment model.
    Top Answer: 
    I am hoping there is more integration with other platforms, more features, and customization in the next release.
    Ranking
    38th
    out of 54 in ERP
    Views
    225
    Comparisons
    194
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    10th
    out of 54 in ERP
    Views
    2,827
    Comparisons
    2,306
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    491
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    JICS
    Dynamics NAV, MS Dynamics NAV
    Learn More
    Jenzabar
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Jenzabar Internet Campus Solution (JICS) helps you connect with all your constituents, from applicants to alumni, and keep them engaged and involved in the life of your school. It’s a powerful resource that offers everyone on campus a single point of access to Web-based self-service, eLearning, communications, and community-building applications. With one login and password, your constituents have 24x7 access to role-specific content, from administrative records and reports to personal email and calendars, from chat rooms to online exams. JICS delivers a flexible, customizable, and extremely scalable infrastructure— the mission-critical elements of a successful portal.

    Microsoft Dynamics NAV is a global enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution that provides small and midsize businesses greater control over their financials and can simplify their supply chain, manufacturing, and operations. It's quick to implement and easy to use, with the power to support your growth ambition.
    Offer
    Learn more about Jenzabar JICS
    Learn more about Microsoft Dynamics NAV
    Sample Customers
    Azusa Pacific Online University, Grove City College, Florida Southern College, Gordon College, Berry College, Charleston Southern University, Northampton Community College, NuVision, Princeton Theological Seminary, Parker University, Pomona College, Montcalm Community College, Park University
    Harris Farm Markets, Mister Spex GmbH, Bounce Foods, Eurofin Services SA, Medica Medizintechnik, Associated Gaskets, Onduline, Sitka Surfboard Corporation, World Animal Protection
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider30%
    Computer Software Company25%
    Educational Organization7%
    Wholesaler/Distributor4%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise24%
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, Microsoft and others in ERP. Updated: January 2022.
    563,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Jenzabar JICS is ranked 38th in ERP while Microsoft Dynamics NAV is ranked 10th in ERP with 10 reviews. Jenzabar JICS is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Dynamics NAV is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics NAV writes "Very easy to scale and the new pricing model is a lot cheaper". Jenzabar JICS is most compared with Ellucian and PeopleSoft, whereas Microsoft Dynamics NAV is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, SAP S4HANA, IFS Applications and Oracle E-Business Suite.

    See our list of best ERP vendors.

    We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.