No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Oracle GlassFish vs Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle GlassFish
Ranking in Application Server
14th
Average Rating
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Ap...
Ranking in Application Server
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Server category, the mindshare of Oracle GlassFish is 3.5%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) is 9.1%, down from 16.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Server Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP)9.1%
Oracle GlassFish3.5%
Other87.4%
Application Server
 

Featured Reviews

it_user517413 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Lead Developer
Offers EE Support. I would like to see integration with MQ systems.
The products offers EE support. It offers ease of use. I would like to see integration with MQ systems.
reviewer2845695 - PeerSpot reviewer
Middleware administrator at a consultancy with 201-500 employees
Reliable platform has supported critical services and simplifies secure enterprise operations
Overall, there is satisfaction with Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP), but there are a few areas where it could be improved. The initial configuration and setup can be complex, especially for new administrators, so a simpler installation and configuration experience would be helpful. The management console could be more modern and intuitive with better dashboards and built-in monitoring capabilities. Although logging is comprehensive, troubleshooting complex issues can still require significant analysis, so enhanced diagnostic tools and more actionable error messages would be beneficial. Better integration with modern DevOps and cloud-native tools out of the box, along with more automation for routine administrative tasks, would make the platform easier to manage and reduce operational effort. Deeper integration with modern DevOps and cloud-native platforms would be valuable, such as improved support for Kubernetes and OpenShift, along with built-in automation for deployments, patching, and configuration management on Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP). Enhanced monitoring and observability with richer dashboards, predictive alerts, and easier integration with tools such as Prometheus and Grafana could also be beneficial. AI-assisted diagnostics that can help identify the root cause of issues more quickly would also be appreciated. Additionally, a more intuitive management tool and simplified upgrade process would make administration easier, especially for larger enterprise environments.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The products offers EE support."
"The solution is stable, you can scale the solution, and there's good documentation and a pretty good community surrounding the product."
"This open source Application server is a good choice for Enterprises using J2EE and gives much better value than Websphere and Weblogic."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The solution is easy to use, and if I use Red Hat JBoss and Red Hat web server, I can do more configuration because I can control my webserver from the AP server without always logging in to the webserver to change or manage configurations."
"The solution has flexibility and stability."
"The stability is good. I would rate it a nine out of ten."
"Since then, no problems have been experienced, and the platform has supported applications that require 24/7 availability and millions of transactions per second."
"We use JBoss mainly for application deployments and application servers."
 

Cons

"I would like to see integration with MQ systems."
"The solution sometimes crashed and had some compatibility issues with the DevOps JAR file."
"The deployment of data sources could be improved."
"You cannot compare Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) with WebSphere, for example, or with WebLogic, but from a peace of mind, it is fine."
"The solution could improve by providing more integration."
"JBoss is too much for what we need."
"JBoss is not as reliable and stable as WebLogic."
"Scalability depends on the application type. For stateless applications, there is no problem scaling horizontally, and multiple instances of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) can be deployed, however, there are sometimes limitations in the possibilities available."
"Scalability is a concern because it is not online, which limits online processes. This aspect can be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing of JBoss is more reasonable than that of WebLogic."
"The solution is cost-efficient compared to other products. Pricing is rated an eight out of ten."
"I rate the product price as eight on a scale, where one means it is a very cheap solution, and ten points mean that it is a very expensive tool."
"We pay for a maintenance license, but it is not expensive."
"JBoss is an expensive solution."
"It is an open-source solution."
"There is no licensing cost. The solution is free to use."
"Despite the price increase after being acquired by IBM, JBoss still maintains its competitiveness. The package provided is more geared towards cloud-based deployments, whereas our setup is more traditional, which makes it slightly more expensive for us. As most vendors are transitioning towards cloud-centric solutions, companies like ours need to adapt accordingly."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Server solutions are best for your needs.
915,325 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
21%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise21
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JBoss?
There is not direct involvement in pricing, licensing, or contract negotiation, so exact costs of Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) cannot be commented on. From an operational per...
What needs improvement with JBoss?
Overall, there is satisfaction with Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP), but there are a few areas where it could be improved. The initial configuration and setup can be complex, es...
What is your primary use case for JBoss?
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) is primarily used for enterprise-level Java applications. Enterprise applications, Java applications such as banking and financial applications, ...
 

Also Known As

GlassFish
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TravelMuse, Clarity Accounting
Tata Sky, Nissan, Swedish Board of Agriculture, Novamedia, American Product Distributors, Advanced Micro Devices, Emirates Group, E*TRADE
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Apache, Oracle and others in Application Server. Updated: September 2026.
915,325 professionals have used our research since 2012.