JBoss vs Oracle GlassFish comparison

"I find JBoss to be lightweight and easier to manage compared to WebSphere."

"JBoss has made it very easy to implement web applications."

"The solution has flexibility and stability."

"We can deploy the applications on the JBoss server, so it is easy to manage. It's also easy to add new certificates to the config."

"It is a Java-based product, so it is pretty straightforward. It is pretty easy from a developer's perspective. It is also pretty reliable and scalable."

"The stability is good. I would rate it a nine out of ten."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"The solution is easy to use."

"The products offers EE support."

"Making it lighter and more modular would probably be beneficial."

"There is not much ability inside of the solution. The world is going beyond different micro and data-type things like Microsoft Office, so we are not seeing much ability within the solution."

"JBoss is not as reliable and stable as WebLogic."

"The price could be improved. Customers don't want to buy the license easily."

"I would like to see improved booting of applications altogether on one page to manage all data instances from one location, similar to an AWS console."

"They are trying to make it less heavyweight since app servers often deliver a lot of functionality. Still, if we aren't leveraging them, they can be too much for certain use cases."

"The tool's documentation could be improved to explain its usage and functionalities clearly. Having accessible documentation would save time for leaders like me when juniors seek information about it. The documentation should be self-explanatory and guide users on how to utilize the tool."

"Scalability is a concern because it is not online, which limits online processes. This aspect can be improved."

"I would like to see integration with MQ systems."

"I rate the product price as eight on a scale, where one means it is a very cheap solution, and ten points mean that it is a very expensive tool."

"JBoss is an expensive solution."

"The pricing of JBoss is more reasonable than that of WebLogic."

"Despite the price increase after being acquired by IBM, JBoss still maintains its competitiveness. The package provided is more geared towards cloud-based deployments, whereas our setup is more traditional, which makes it slightly more expensive for us. As most vendors are transitioning towards cloud-centric solutions, companies like ours need to adapt accordingly."

"The solution is cost-efficient compared to other products. Pricing is rated an eight out of ten."

"Since the solution is freeware, our customers don't need to pay any licensing fees."

"There is no licensing cost. The solution is free to use."

"It is an open-source solution."