Ixia Hawkeye vs Statseeker comparison

Keysight Technologies and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #83, while Techniche is ranked #63 with an average rating of 7.0. Keysight Technologies holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

Ixia Hawkeye

Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews

1,047 Views
691 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

900 Views
855 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Ixia Hawkeye

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and Ixia Hawkeye compete in the network monitoring solutions category. Statseeker offers advantages in reporting and visibility, while Ixia Hawkeye stands out with its performance testing features, providing an edge for those seeking advanced network assurance.

Features: Statseeker offers comprehensive reporting, detailed performance analytics, and extensive network visibility. Ixia Hawkeye provides proactive network performance testing, simulation capabilities, and network assurance. Statseeker emphasizes reporting, while Ixia Hawkeye focuses on testing and assurance.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker could enhance proactive performance monitoring, expand simulation capabilities, and improve network assurance features. Ixia Hawkeye might benefit from streamlining its deployment process, offering more cost-effective solutions, and improving user training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker facilitates quick integration with straightforward deployment and responsive support. Ixia Hawkeye is more complex to deploy due to its extensive features but compensates with in-depth support and resources for implementation. Statseeker's process is user-friendly, whereas Ixia Hawkeye's support aids its complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker has relatively lower setup costs, providing faster ROI with efficient deployment. Ixia Hawkeye involves higher initial costs but offers ROI through its advanced features ensuring network performance gains. Statseeker is budget-friendly, while Ixia Hawkeye justifies its investment with superior capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Ixia Hawkeye vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. Statseeker

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,176 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ixia Hawkeye

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

83rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (6th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (63rd)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Statseeker	0.4%
Ixia Hawkeye	0.5%
Other	99.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting

Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."

"Being able to look back historically at the uptime and downtime is invaluable."

"This solution allowed us to track down trouble users."

"The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us."

"We are now able to easily track where problems are with bandwidth and port errors, rather than having to do a lot of diagnostics."

"It also allows us to predict the capacity on WAN circuits, as well as other circuits, to help us plan for upgrading."

"The product simplifies monitoring by providing real-time alerts through a GUI dashboard, email and texts."

"If somebody is complaining about slow networking then this solution allows us to see various ports to find out whether they are being overloaded."

"The most valuable feature is the dashboard, where you have everything right there on the screen."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

"Improvements in network performance are essential."

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

"I would like to see fully automatic updates so that our version is always current."

"It would be nice if I could easily select individual interfaces."

"With Statseeker I'd like to see some flow, i.e. what's tuning-up the network. The trend I like is managing the traffic load by going to the cloud."

"The inclusion of configuration management features and SIP links would improve this solution."

"It would be nice if they had twenty-four-hour technical support because we contact Australia and we have to wait for them to open."

"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."

"I would like to see the solution incorporate diagnosis of the workstation."

"I would like to have soft alarming. If an inner-base all of a sudden triggers a threshold, we have to rely on a lot of other tools and then we go into Statseeker to verify it. If Statseeker would confirm it preemptively and trigger it into our network panel, that would be nice."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."

"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."

"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."

"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."

"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

University

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 15% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 14% of the time

Aurea CX Monitor vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 12% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 11% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 10% of the time

More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 29% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 19% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 15% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker

Compared 12% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker

Compared 12% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

Download Ixia Hawkeye product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

January 2026

Download Statseeker product report

Overview

Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.

Keysight Technologies

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

EMA

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. Statseeker

December 2025

Free Report: Ixia Hawkeye vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia Hawkeye vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ixia Hawkeye vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.