No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management vs SuperOps.ai comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint ...
Ranking in Patch Management
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
IT Asset Management (4th), Vulnerability Management (20th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (5th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (4th), Mobile Threat Defense (4th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (17th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (6th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (5th), Autonomous Endpoint Management (1st)
SuperOps.ai
Ranking in Patch Management
23rd
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (15th)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2882148 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Automated onboarding has saved hundreds of hours and now standardizes device security globally
In terms of how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, I think there's potential for automation of some repetitive tasks. The device provisioning process has already become very close to zero-touch, but the patch deployment is still scheduled and policy-driven. As a result, I believe we can reduce endpoint administration further. I also think the number of integrations and the scalability of the tool can be improved, along with customer service, as we've encountered some issues in certain countries. Regarding the needed improvements, particularly concerning integrations or customer service challenges, we have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing. Occasionally, we also experienced delays between systems, particularly with user group changes and device compliance updates. The accuracy and reliability of output from Ivanti's AI can be improved. We notice that the AI-driven insights are useful, but there are anomalies and some false positives. Since we are still in a validation period, I cannot provide a definitive mark, but I believe that accuracy should be enhanced, especially for more complex and environment-specific issues where human intervention is still needed.
Pradip Dey - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Solution Architect at Express Systems Limited (ESL)
Monitoring tool, user-friendly and interactive but experienced an issue with integration
The most valuable thing is that we can integrate any other solutions with SuperOps. Like, SuperOps is a monitoring tool, but for security, for backup, we can integrate with other solutions providers as well. I like the PSA tool. It is very user-friendly and interactive with the customer as well. We can, the customer, give feedback directly to the solution. There is no need for another communication channel, like a different email from Outlook or any other tool. From the same solution, we could communicate with the customer, and the customer could reply. So, it includes a collaboration tool with the customer. It could immediately pop up any problem that's at the customer end or in the end devices. Sometimes, it happens that we come to know about an incident negatively, but the monitoring tool gave me the information immediately.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"MobileIron UEM is a scalable solution."
"AI-powered automation and self-healing are additional features that automatically fix common issues and reduce manual work."
"Its features are very complete."
"The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date."
"The best features Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management offers are the integration it provides with our Apple Business Manager."
"The technical support from Ivanti is good."
"Ivanti's unified platform for IT and security operations helps streamline processes, especially because the manual intervention of having to constantly monitor, update, and maintain endpoints and applications has significantly reduced by leveraging Ivanti Neurons for UEM."
"Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management has had a significant positive impact on my organization, particularly in reducing manual endpoint management efforts and moving from reactive support to proactive remediation."
"The customer service and support are very good."
 

Cons

"In terms of improvements for Ivanti Neurons for UEM, the only challenge I face with EPM Endpoint Manager is in scanning network devices, as some devices appear without a serial number, which is an issue that takes more time since customers often require the serial number as a mandatory field."
"I would like to have better support for the application."
"Sometimes I find that the reporting in Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is too detailed, and I would appreciate the ability to customize my reporting a little bit more."
"Regarding Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management agent in general, it can seem somewhat laggy."
"The ticket resolution workflow requires duplicate documentation, which does not add value and increases the time required to process tickets."
"The biggest improvement I would like to see in Ivanti Neurons for UEM is a more intuitive interface with simpler navigation for common tasks."
"The integration between the MobileIron and Advanced Neurons isn't completely in sync, and we're still working on that."
"Customer support is really poor."
"I found some issues when I integrated the accounting software with Xero."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."
"The price of MobileIron UEM is very good."
"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."
"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."
"The solution is expensive compared to other products."
"The solution is affordable."
"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."
"It is affordable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Performing Arts
10%
Healthcare Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise31
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing is that it is quite high.
What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for UEM?
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management can be improved by allowing me to drive optimization, proactive monitoring, and automatic information, which lets Ivanti detect and resolve endpoint issues fas...
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?
My main use case for Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is support. I use Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management in my daily work to review tickets and look at issues and access requests. I have ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management,Ivanti Neurons for RBVM,Ivanti Neurons for VULN KB,Ivanti Mobile Threat Defense,Ivanti Neurons for Spend Intelligence, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, Ivanti Neurons for EASM
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Frontier Airlines
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: September 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.