ITRS Geneos vs Kentik comparison

Read 16 Kentik reviews

1,533 Views
1,165 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ITRS Geneos and Kentik are key players in the real-time monitoring market, each offering unique strengths. Geneos excels with its extensive customization and robust plug-ins, making it suitable for financial sectors. Conversely, Kentik is known for its superior network traffic visibility and integration capabilities.

Features: ITRS Geneos offers extensive customization options, a wide range of plug-ins, and comprehensive dashboards. It is well-suited for financial sectors requiring detailed infrastructural monitoring. Kentik provides deep dives into flow data, real-time insights, and effective anomaly detection, helping with network management tasks.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos could enhance historical data analysis, reporting tools, and clearer documentation. Users also look for better cloud monitoring capabilities and integration methods. Kentik users request more actionable insights and improved API usability, as well as better cost analysis features and smoother interface transitions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos mainly supports on-premises deployment but now offers public cloud options. Its customer service is praised for responsiveness and technical expertise. Kentik supports both on-premises and private cloud environments, with users emphasizing its knowledgeable customer service and quick issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos is often considered expensive, but users find its features justify the cost, leading to reduced incidents and better efficiency. Kentik's pricing is based on devices and flow volume, recognized as cost-effective for its traffic analytics capabilities. Both solutions contribute to decreased downtime and improved user satisfaction.

To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. Kentik Report (Updated: July 2025).

Download the complete report

ITRS Geneos vs. Kentik

July 2025

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

69th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (34th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (49th)

Kentik

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

34th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (16th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kentik is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

ADRIANA SALDARRIAGA TOBON

Sales Manager at IFX NEtworks

Client experience and cybersecurity have improved with an easy setup

The solution is valuable for client experience, especially in the financial sector. The most important feature is cybersecurity. The pricing is good, but the functionality is the most important aspect for clients. The solution is easy to deploy and requires only one person to set up, making it easy and quick. Overall, the ease of use and the fact that it meets client expectations are major positives.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The filtering in the Active Console is exceptional. Depending on the user base, some people don't want to see server-level errors, so we have filters set up in the Managed Entities view, which allow us to filter out things that certain groups don't want to see, while allowing them to see other things. It's a great real-time monitoring solution. And you can draw graphs immediately, right from the Active Console, whether they're current graphs or historical graphs."

"The flexibility of the product is most valuable. It is highly customizable. If you put your mind to it and think of something you could do, there's a good possibility you can get it integrated within the console, if it's not readily available. The simplicity or ease of customization has been valuable."

"It's also easy to implement. The implementation of Geneos is very easy and interesting. It's not complicated. It's very quick to implement. The installation is very easy. There are many topics about ITRS Geneos that explain more about the features of the function of Geneos."

"Real-time log monitoring with desktop alerts is valuable as it tells us immediately when there is an issue."

"Custom script toolkits"

"The NetProbe carries over 100 samplers which are capable of monitoring hardware, OS, and the application layer."

"The great advantage of this tool is real-time monitoring."

"One of the most valuable features of ITRS Geneos is the active time feature that helps with the trading applications that I support."

More ITRS Geneos pros

"It offers a simple yet powerful feature of classifying applications, going beyond basic statistics."

"Overall, I would give Kentik nine out of ten stars."

"We're also using Kentik to ingest metrics. It's a useful feature, and its response time, whenever we're pulling back the data, is higher than our on-prem solution."

"We're pretty happy with the API functionality. It's web, and it's very simple to set up queries. It has served us well and you don't need to be an expert on the API or the product to set these things up."

"Monitoring operational efficiency is easy."

"Having the API access allows us to do a great deal of automation around a lot of our reporting and management tools."

"The drill-down into detailed views of network activity helps to quickly pinpoint locations and causes. All the information is there."

"The most important feature is cybersecurity."

More Kentik pros

Cons

"Backward compatibility with deprecated features and in system documentation on what configuration areas are needed to be updated."

"One area where there is room for improvement is the log file. I would like to be able to do a pre-run on the log files. When you are testing log files for regular expressions, it would be good to be able to do a quick check up front on that side of things before you release that into production."

"t needs to have better middleware integration for things such as application and Microsft SQL servers."

"The dashboard feature is full of bugs. Grouping items results in a distorted dashboard."

"We all look at the same things - CPU, disk space, paging stats, service status with RAG status on each. That could be provided straight out, saving significant time."

"I would like to see ITRS integrate its setup editor with a SVN to check-in setup XML after major changes."

"A lightweight version which could host more than 100 gateways, as we can see slowness while loading all our gateways."

"There is one drawback to using lightweight data collection: we lack the feature of observability based on time series, such as historical model data. This makes it difficult to view data in ITRS. ITRS needs to improve this feature."

More ITRS Geneos cons

"They're moving more in a direction where they are saying, "Hey, here's information that you may be interested in or may a need," before the question has to explicitly be asked. Continuing to move in that direction would be a good thing."

"I consider the pricing model as an area for improvement."

"I've checked out the V4 version of the interface and it's still a little bit clunky for me to use. I still go back to the old interface. That's definitely one that they still need to work on. It doesn't seem like everything that you get in the V3, the older interface, is there. For instance, I was trying to add a user or do the administrative tasks in V4, and I couldn't figure out where I was supposed to do that."

"The product could strive for more improvements to become closer to perfect."

"I would like to see them explore the area of cost analysis."

"There is room for improvement around the usability of the API. It's a hugely complex task to call it and you need a lot of backing to be able to do it. I should say, as someone who's not in networking, maybe it's easier for people who are in networking, but for me that one part is not very user-friendly."

"I believe they're already working on this, but I would love for them to create better integrations from network flow data to application performance — tracing — so that we could overlay that data more readily. With more companies going hybrid, flow logs and flow data, whether it be VPC or on-prem, matched with application performance and trace data, is pretty important."

"We asked for a way, regarding the potential networks that exist, to hook Kentik up with external tools like peering DBs to correlate things together and see what we can do... This is all in the [next] beta now."

More Kentik cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is priced quite high. There are pricing options for customers based on the size of the environment and plug-ins used by the monitoring system."

"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."

"The organization is not just purchasing a license for the product, but also managing services and professional services from ITRS. Another factor is if the implementation is going to be in production, non-production, or both."

"The market tools are on par with this solution, but if the solution included more features, then it would be well within the range for the cost."

"You will get the best price if you get a single global deal."

"I can say it's not that cheap because the licensing is a little bit costly"

"It is expensive. They have to look at the model around when we move to cloud and how that's going to work. The licensing cost does pay off because of the improvements in support to our business."

"Its price is reasonable. It isn't too expensive, and it isn't too cheap, but it also depends on a company's volume and negotiation."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

"We have an annual contract with Kentik that we renew each year for a set number of licenses. We also have some burstable licenses which we can spin up and spin down, and those are paid as they are used."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

73%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?

ITRS offers multiple products, including upgrades for synthetic monitoring and a SaaS platform. Geneos is used for infrastructure monitoring, covering KPIs such as CPU, memory, processes, network l...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kentik?

I would say Kentik's pricing is not cheap. From my perspective as part of the technical team, I would not categorize it as expensive, but I know it is not cheap.

What needs improvement with Kentik?

There's always room for improvements and better relations when using any kind of product. We faced some issues with Kentik UI and alerting, which we asked them to fix, and they succeeded. They have...

What is your primary use case for Kentik?

We are using Kentik mostly for synthetic tests, and from one last year, network monitoring as well. We are using it for inter DC BGP tests and server monitoring as well.

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 20% of the time

Compared 14% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

ThousandEyes vs Kentik

Compared 14% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kentik

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs Kentik

Compared 9% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Kentik

Compared 9% of the time

Zabbix vs Kentik

Compared 9% of the time

More Kentik Competitors

Product Reports

Download ITRS Geneos product report

ITRS Geneos

August 2025

Download Kentik product report

August 2025

Also Known As

Geneos

No data available

Overview

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Kentik's AIOps Network Traffic Intelligence platform unifies network operations, performance, security, and business intelligence.

With a purpose-built big data engine delivered as public or private SaaS, Kentik captures a high-resolution view of actual network traffic data and enriches it with critical application and business data, so every network event or analysis can be tied to revenue & costs, customer & user experience, performance & risk.

Sample Customers

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Pandora, Yelp, Neustar, Box, University of Washington, Zoom, Tata, and Cogent.