Infor LX vs SAP ERP comparison

Infor and SAP are both solutions in the ERP category. Infor is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.5, while SAP is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. Infor holds a 1.5% mindshare in ERP, compared to SAP’s 10.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Infor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Infor LX

Read 9 Infor LX reviews

1,267 Views
1,216 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP ERP

Read 108 SAP ERP reviews

10,891 Views
9,366 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Infor LX

SAP ERP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

SAP ERP and Infor LX are both enterprise resource planning systems tailored for different business environments. SAP ERP appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive support network and customization capabilities across multiple industries, while Infor LX excels in features tailored specifically for manufacturing sectors.

Features: SAP ERP offers a comprehensive suite including financials, supply chain management, and analytics. It supports diverse industries through its capacity for extensive customization. Key features include finance management, real-time end-to-end transactions, and human capital management solutions. Infor LX, on the other hand, is strong in manufacturing operations, providing robust functionality for both process and discrete manufacturing. It ensures seamless integration across manufacturing processes with strong planning features and real-time automation of transactions.

Room for Improvement: SAP ERP may require simplification of its complex interface and reduction in high implementation costs. It can improve flexibility for smaller businesses and speed up data processing for large datasets. Infor LX could improve its scalability options beyond manufacturing and smooth out transitions for non-manufacturing sectors. Its documentation and user interface could also be more user-friendly, and the integration capabilities for broad, non-manufacturing applications need enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP ERP offers flexible deployment options with thorough documentation and a strong global support network, ensuring smoother transitions for large enterprises. Its extensive customer service provides comprehensive support, facilitating integration within large-scale operations. Infor LX provides a streamlined deployment process with targeted expert support for manufacturing implementations. Its deployment is efficient when focusing on specific industry requirements.

Pricing and ROI: SAP ERP often incurs higher setup costs reflective of its extensive capabilities and scalability, promising substantial ROI through optimized processes. Despite the higher initial investment, its functionalities often justify the cost for businesses aiming for comprehensive solutions. Infor LX provides a more budget-friendly initial cost with a focus on rapid ROI, leveraging specialized features that align with specific industry needs. Its competitive pricing is especially advantageous for manufacturing-centric enterprises seeking effective value-driven solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Infor LX vs. SAP ERP Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX vs. SAP ERP

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infor LX

Ranking in ERP

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP ERP

Ranking in ERP

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

108

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor LX is 1.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP ERP is 10.4%, down from 19.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SAP ERP	10.4%
Infor LX	1.5%
Other	88.1%

ERP

Featured Reviews

reviewer2149446

IT Director at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Consistent optimization of production and efficient procurement processes improve operational effectiveness

I am working as an IT Director at Istituto De Angeli, which is a company of Fareva. FAREVA is a leading global contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO) specializing in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, makeup, and home and industrial care products. I have worked with the traceability and audit features in Infor LX, including the electronic signature module, which is essential in the pharmaceutical industry. The electronic signature is a key component of compliance for our ERP. This is crucial for periodic inspections we receive from authorities, including European authorities, Italian AIFA, USA FDA and other Pharma Agencies and Ministry world wide. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Infor LX a 9.

Read full review

Achmad Dimyati

IT Service Management Team Lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Long-term adaptation and evolution meets changing technology trends

SAP ERP is not really real-time. We use the HANA database which is supposed to be memory data in memory, but we are still not very happy. It is supposed to be real-time and come very quickly, but in reality, it still takes time to run. That is why we use BW of SAP, Business Objects, and now we have moved to the Analytic Cloud where we start using predictive AI. SAP recently implemented Databricks, and they started investing significantly in the analytic environment. SAP ERP has been left behind as they moved to S/4HANA with the HANA database. They restructured the whole table structure of SAP ERP, introduced simple finance, simple logistics, and moved HR to SuccessFactors. They have the BTP layer where they manage everything from integration to master data management. The challenge with SAP is that they move very fast to different products and buy different products. It requires significant investment and many skills to catch up because all of these have different sets of technology. The fundamental has changed differently. It is not monolithic anymore but different products under one name, SAP. You have to buy it model by model for additional models. Products such as SuccessFactors, Ariba for procure to pay, Concur for travel, and Facility Management use totally different technology. They try to integrate with each other, but it remains a challenge for SAP to make them have the same management, technology, and operational approach.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the exit points that enable integration with external software."

"Infor LX is effective for planning, manufacturing, and distribution processes."

"This solution has brought structure and shape to our day-to-day operations."

"One of the things I love about Infor LX is that everything is integrated."

"I've been using it since December 2009, and it has been absolutely stable till now."

"One of the major advantages of Infor LX is the stability of the program."

"One of the things I love about Infor LX is that everything is integrated."

"One of the major advantages of Infor LX is the stability of the program."

More Infor LX pros

"The transactional integration of operations is the best-recommended feature of this product; it provides integration of all operational modules."

"Finance, Controlling, Material management, and Plant maintenance are valuable features, especially the integration between the various components."

"The most valuable feature is the robust workflows that SAP provides to us in our organization. Overall, I find it the best ERP solution compared to other similar solutions."

"I like the solution's ability to close plans and resource requirements in deals."

"Finance view across functions has been valuable."

"We run our entire business from order receipt to invoicing, and we also do manufacturing, purchasing, invoice control, billing, and reporting on SAP."

"Stability-wise, SAP ERP is the best product among others."

"SAP ERP is very good for a production company that has physical products because they can use it perfectly and see all the details about the business processes that they need to know."

More SAP ERP pros

Cons

"The user interface of Infor LX needs significant enhancement to be more user-friendly."

"It lacks in finance and administration, especially related to Italian accounting."

"From a supporting point of view, Infor LX is not quite what I see with SAP and other areas."

"The interface needs enhancement, as I am still using outdated screens. I would benefit from a more integrated interface."

"Infor has now stopped and drastically reduced investing in this product."

"Infor's support side is not that good, and they seem to be focusing on other products above LX."

"Infor needs more APIs, as in the current version, APIs are not fully developed. The development of APIs must be enhanced, especially for AS400."

More Infor LX cons

"Functionality could be improved."

"The user interface could be improved. For example, sometimes you're missing some data and can't complete a task. There should be some built-in support and suggestions on how to solve your problem. I would also like the interface to be optimized to work better with mobile devices like tablets and smartphones."

"The biggest issue with the solution is that it could be a little more user-friendly."

"They are not making a big effort to make it easy to integrate solutions from other vendors."

"Certain things are off-the shelf, but there are a few things that need to be developed based on client specific or unique business processes."

"One thing that is lacking in ERP is a good user interface. It is currently very clumsy and complex."

"The initial setup is complex."

"I'm only working on the front end with ERP's user interface, which isn't very easy for end-users. It's an old-school interface, so it's often challenging to find what you need."

More SAP ERP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Infor LX is not cheap but much cheaper compared to SAP HANA."

"Our last maintenance fee was around $15,000 a year for 33 current users."

"Pricing is variable due to different deals and discounts, typically starting at around $2000 US dollars for one license."

"I rate the product's price a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap or affordable, and ten is really expensive. The solution is expensive."

"The licensing costs are slightly on the higher side. They need to make it more competitive."

"The price of SAP ERP is high, but it is worth the money. The maintenance and support can be expensive. There should be a different price model for businesses that are not as large to be able to afford it."

"Some components are available at an additional cost, depending on the type of contract that you have."

"Licensing can vary, but for educational institutions, there are often favorable conditions."

"It could always be cheaper. They don't have a very easy model of licensing, but large entities would get the upper hand in negotiating the license."

"I rate SAP ERP's pricing a six or seven out of ten."

"I don't know the price, but I know its licensing is on a yearly basis."

More SAP ERP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

University

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	31
Large Enterprise	78

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Infor LX?

For Infor LX itself, the gap for improvement is to add some AI functionality to the product in the future.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor LX?

Infor LX is primarily used for manufacturing. The use case involved transitioning from a previous Wipro project, moving from Pfizer to GSK, with the entire migration occurring within Infor LX. For ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infor LX?

Regarding pricing for Infor LX, on a scale where one is a high price and ten is a low price, I would rate it accordingly.

See all answers

Is Anaplan better than SAP ERP?

There are different aspects of both Anaplan and SAP ERP that I like and dislike. Anaplan improves forecast accuracy and drives up the quality of analytics. Rather than spending all of their time co...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP ERP?

The solution has made the most significant impact on our human resources function, specifically in HR operations and HR analytics. One feature of SAP ERP that I found most valuable is its use of co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP ERP?

SAP ERP logged out in slightly less time than expected. Updates to the SAP UI would be useful.

See all answers

Comparisons

Infor LN vs Infor LX

Compared 34% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Infor LX

Compared 8% of the time

Infor M3 vs Infor LX

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Infor LX

Compared 5% of the time

QAD Cloud ERP vs Infor LX

Compared 5% of the time

More Infor LX Competitors

SAP S/4HANA vs SAP ERP

Compared 14% of the time

Infor M3 vs SAP ERP

Compared 6% of the time

Anaplan vs SAP ERP

Compared 6% of the time

IFS Cloud Platform vs SAP ERP

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs SAP ERP

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP ERP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX

March 2026

Download Infor LX product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP ERP

February 2026

Download SAP ERP product report

Also Known As

Infor ERP LX, ERP LX

No data available

Overview

Infor LX is a comprehensive process manufacturing system that covers various manufacturing methods, including made to stock, made to order, configure to order, assemble to order, batch, repetitive, flow, and Lean manufacturing. A wide range of industries—including consumer packaged goods, food and beverage, life sciences, medical devices, chemicals, automotive, and general manufacturing—trust Infor LX to improve performance and profit margins at a lower total cost than comparable solutions.

Infor

SAP ERP addresses the core business software requirements of midsize and large organizations in all industries and sectors. SAP ERP includes four individual solutions that support key areas of enterprise resource planning: human capital management, financials, operations, corporate services.

SAP

Sample Customers

Shaklee Corporation, Clover Dairy, Cremer, Group Dekko

B&G Manufacturing, Unilever, Life is good Inc., Joy Global Inc., City of Cape Town, Bhopal Municipal, Corporation (BMC), adidas Group, Butcher & Packer Supply Company, Franklin Valve L.P., Evoshield, Prime Meats, a Norsan Group company, EMC Corporation, Varian Medical Systems Inc., FC Bayern Mªnchen AG, AkzoNobel Chemicals B.V., T¾V Rheinland, Pacific Drilling S.A., Fire & Rescue New South Wales, University of Amsterdam, Pa_alon S.A.

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX vs. SAP ERP

March 2026

Free Report: Infor LX vs. SAP ERP

Find out what your peers are saying about Infor LX vs. SAP ERP and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infor LX vs. SAP ERP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.