Infor LX vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne comparison

Infor and Oracle are both solutions in the ERP category. Infor is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5, while Oracle is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.4. Infor holds a 1.3% mindshare in ERP, compared to Oracle’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Infor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Infor LX

Read 9 Infor LX reviews

1,744 Views
1,674 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Read 63 JD Edwards EnterpriseOne reviews

5,139 Views
4,060 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Infor LX

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Infor LX and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne compete in the enterprise resource planning systems category. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive and advanced capabilities, providing greater value.

Features: Infor LX provides strong manufacturing and distribution capabilities ideal for complex manufacturing requirements, interactive planning, and seamless system integration for automation. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers extensive reporting and analytics, superior integration capabilities, scalability, financial and user navigation, and robust customization options.

Room for Improvement: Infor LX could enhance analytics depth, broaden integration scope, and improve scalability. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne might benefit from simpler implementation processes, reduced complexity in use for non-technical users, and lower initial costs for better accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infor LX offers a straightforward deployment process with strong customer support catered to manufacturing sectors. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, although more complex due to its broad scope, excels in providing comprehensive customization options and exceptional service and support.

Pricing and ROI: Infor LX is recognized for its reasonable upfront costs and good ROI within manufacturing settings. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, despite higher initial pricing, provides a significant return on investment through its expansive features and functionality, often leading to higher overall satisfaction.

To learn more, read our detailed Infor LX vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,417 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infor LX

Ranking in ERP

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Ranking in ERP

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Activity Based Costing Software (3rd), Production Planning (1st), Demand Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor LX is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is 2.8%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne	2.8%
Infor LX	1.3%
Other	95.9%

ERP

Featured Reviews

reviewer2149446

IT Director at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Consistent optimization of production and efficient procurement processes improve operational effectiveness

I am working as an IT Director at Istituto De Angeli, which is a company of Fareva. FAREVA is a leading global contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO) specializing in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, makeup, and home and industrial care products. I have worked with the traceability and audit features in Infor LX, including the electronic signature module, which is essential in the pharmaceutical industry. The electronic signature is a key component of compliance for our ERP. This is crucial for periodic inspections we receive from authorities, including European authorities, Italian AIFA, USA FDA and other Pharma Agencies and Ministry world wide. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Infor LX a 9.

Read full review

Euan Ellis

Director of IT Applications at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported global operations through multi-currency and modular customization

Oracle's support is not that good for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. Their support is expensive, and I don't think you're getting your bang for your buck. For the cloud product, they do give you support, but everything is online and you might not get somebody. I would give Oracle's support for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne about a 6.5 on a scale of one to 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Infor LX has improved my customers' manufacturing processes by creating a standard in the process, which improves performance in manufacturing as well as finance, distribution, and supply chain."

"Mainly for manufacturing and processing, everything is excellent."

"Infor LX is effective for planning, manufacturing, and distribution processes."

"I've been using it since December 2009, and it has been absolutely stable till now."

"One of the major advantages of Infor LX is the stability of the program."

"The most important feature of Infor LX for me is the use of models for accounting, which create effects in different layers simultaneously."

"The most valuable features are the exit points that enable integration with external software."

"One of the things I love about Infor LX is that everything is integrated."

More Infor LX pros

"When it's boiled down to the ERP system, I would recommend Oracle EOne compared to SAP since you can do lots of customization, and you have lots of other functionalities enabled in the system."

"We compared one company which was working on SAP and converted to JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, and it was a big company that converted from SAP to JD Edwards."

"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."

"The technical support level is quite good."

"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is very scalable. It is suitable for any business size, from retail to manufacturing, and can grow with any business."

"The most valuable feature for us is its robustness, especially coming from the system we had before because it can do so many more things."

"It brings operational efficiency by integrating different processes within the organization into one system."

"JDE is one of the best software, which satisfies client requirements easily."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pros

Cons

"The user interface of Infor LX needs significant enhancement to be more user-friendly."

"Infor has now stopped and drastically reduced investing in this product."

"Infor's support side is not that good, and they seem to be focusing on other products above LX."

"It lacks in finance and administration, especially related to Italian accounting."

"From a supporting point of view, Infor LX is not quite what I see with SAP and other areas."

"The interface needs enhancement, as I am still using outdated screens. I would benefit from a more integrated interface."

"It's based on AS/400 or Power i, a robust technology and platform. However, it is harder to manage admin most of the time."

"The connectors, performance, and knowledgebase availability can be improved."

More Infor LX cons

"Some modules are expensive and there is an annual software maintenance cost as well."

"Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS."

"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."

"The only issue with the solution that it yet to consider improvements in its price."

"They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation."

"This is one area that could be improved -- the features that can be changed to fit your own organization."

"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."

"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our last maintenance fee was around $15,000 a year for 33 current users."

"Pricing is variable due to different deals and discounts, typically starting at around $2000 US dollars for one license."

"Infor LX is not cheap but much cheaper compared to SAP HANA."

"The pricing is an "arm-and-a-leg". This keeps the customers away from going for J.D. Edwards."

"The price of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is high. However, every ERP solution has a high price."

"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has a lot of value for the money. The implementation cost and license cost are quite reasonable compared to other solutions, such as Oracle EBS or SAP."

"The pricing is very high. Even though the license is perpetual yet you have to get the maintenance. Since we pay using Pesos, it's very expensive."

"The solution's pricing depends on the deal and the number of users."

"It depends on the number of users and the modules that you want to buy. It is licensed on a perpetual license basis. You buy the license costs upfront, and then there is maintenance for support that you pay every year, which is typically about 20%."

"I rate the tool's pricing a three out of ten."

"The solution is really expensive."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Infor LX?

For Infor LX itself, the gap for improvement is to add some AI functionality to the product in the future.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Infor LX?

Infor LX is primarily used for manufacturing. The use case involved transitioning from a previous Wipro project, moving from Pfizer to GSK, with the entire migration occurring within Infor LX. For ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infor LX?

Regarding pricing for Infor LX, on a scale where one is a high price and ten is a low price, I would rate it accordingly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

Initially, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne was priced very high, and the licensing is very expensive. I think Oracle has revised those prices. Competition has perhaps forced them to revise those pricing b...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

I have experience with similar solutions and also this product, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne. I haven't worked with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne for the last 18 months, but I still know the product. I am f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's analytics are not that helpful. People generally attach other analytic solutions to it. This is something that JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve on.

See all answers

Comparisons

Infor LN vs Infor LX

Compared 26% of the time

SAP ERP vs Infor LX

Compared 13% of the time

QAD Cloud ERP vs Infor LX

Compared 7% of the time

Infor M3 vs Infor LX

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Infor LX

Compared 5% of the time

More Infor LX Competitors

SAP ERP vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle E-Business Suite vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 8% of the time

PeopleSoft vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 7% of the time

JD Edwards World vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 6% of the time

NetSuite ERP vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Compared 5% of the time

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX

June 2026

Download Infor LX product report

Buyer's Guide

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

June 2026

Download JD Edwards EnterpriseOne product report

Also Known As

Infor ERP LX, ERP LX

No data available

Overview

Infor LX enhances enterprise-level processes with advanced production and resource planning capabilities, supporting manufacturing and financial management seamlessly.

Infor LX offers robust integration capabilities and automation, allowing for efficient manufacturing and resource management. Its interactive platform ensures seamless connectivity in accounting and finance, while users benefit from its adaptability to diverse requirements. Its ability to manage manufacturing, distribution, and transactions with ease makes it a versatile choice across multiple industries.

What are the key features of Infor LX?

Production Planning: Improves scheduling and resource allocation.
Process Automation: Reduces manual efforts with automated workflows.
ERP Integration: Ensures smooth operations across external systems.
Resource Management: Enhances inventory and material handling.
Financial Management: Integrates accounting and operational processes.

What benefits should users expect?

Efficiency Improvement: Streamlines operations for better productivity.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing business requirements.
Integration Support: Facilitates synergy across departments and applications.
Standardized Processes: Enhances performance consistency.

Infor LX is implemented across industries with a focus on manufacturing, supply chain, and finance operations. It excels in production planning, procurement, and quality control, adapting to remote access needs through Web Talk, and remains competitive in environments transitioning from AS/400 to a cloud-based infrastructure.

Infor

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne provides an adaptable ERP platform with integrated modules, allowing users to meet diverse business needs effectively. Its strengths in flexibility, customization, and ease of use make it ideal for global operations across multiple platforms and currencies.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers a comprehensive ERP platform supporting financial management, inventory control, and manufacturing processes. Users benefit from a user-friendly interface, real-time data access, and scalable architecture, which enhances workflow efficiency. The software's multi-language support and seamless setup accommodate global operations. Programming flexibility allows for easy customizations, while orchestration and business intelligence features enrich analytics capabilities. Areas for improvement include customization options, reporting flexibility, and supporting industry-specific features. Enhancements in automation, cloud adaptation, and pricing strategies are recommended. Training materials, deployment ease, integration capabilities, and support for international localization require attention. Analytics and dashboard functionalities could be more intuitive, and updates should align with industry requirements.

What are the key features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne?

Integrated Modules: Supports financial, inventory, and manufacturing processes for comprehensive ERP functionality.
Multi-platform and Multi-currency Capabilities: Enables seamless global operations across different platforms and currencies.
User-friendly Interface: Ensures easy navigation and efficient use.
Real-time Data Access: Provides up-to-date data for informed decision-making.
Scalable Architecture: Adapts to business growth and changing operational needs.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Improved workflow through integrated processes and real-time access.
Flexibility: Customizable features to meet varied business requirements.
Global Support: Multi-language and multi-currency capabilities enhance international operations.
Business Intelligence: Enhanced decision-making through advanced analytics features.
Operational Integration: Seamless integration with other systems to streamline processes.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is widely used in sectors such as manufacturing, trade, and distribution, often in financial management roles including accounting, budgeting, and procurement. It supports both on-premise and cloud deployments, integrating with existing systems for enhanced processes like capital asset management and operational functions through automation tools like Orchestrator.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Shaklee Corporation, Clover Dairy, Cremer, Group Dekko

TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,

Buyer's Guide

Infor LX vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

June 2026

Free Report: Infor LX vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Find out what your peers are saying about Infor LX vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,417 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infor LX vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.