Infor CloudSuite vs Microsoft Dynamics GP comparison

Infor and Microsoft are both solutions in the ERP category. Infor is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3. Infor holds a 2.1% mindshare in ERP, compared to Microsoft’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Infor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Infor CloudSuite

Read 19 Infor CloudSuite reviews

3,763 Views
1,355 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Read 25 Microsoft Dynamics GP reviews

1,081 Views
1,038 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Infor CloudSuite

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Infor CloudSuite and Microsoft Dynamics GP are competitive enterprise solutions addressing various business needs. Microsoft Dynamics GP has an advantage in features and overall functionality.

Features: Infor CloudSuite offers significant value with industry-specific functionalities, cloud-based capabilities, and adaptability across diverse sectors. Microsoft Dynamics GP stands out for its robust financial management, extensive reporting tools, and capability to deliver detailed financial insights.

Room for Improvement: Infor CloudSuite could enhance its financial insights and expand its support network for non-cloud-based implementations. Its integration with non-industry-specific solutions may also be improved. Microsoft Dynamics GP could simplify its deployment process, enhance its cloud capabilities, and offer more competitive pricing for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Infor CloudSuite's cloud deployment simplifies access while minimizing infrastructure requirements, supported by generally effective customer service. Microsoft Dynamics GP relies more on traditional deployment models, which can be challenging, but a solid support infrastructure slightly improves ongoing operations.

Pricing and ROI: Infor CloudSuite attracts with relatively lower setup costs, presenting a compelling ROI for businesses seeking budget-friendly solutions. Microsoft Dynamics GP, while potentially higher in initial expenses, justifies its ROI through enhanced functionalities, especially in finance and accounting environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Infor CloudSuite vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Infor CloudSuite vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infor CloudSuite

Ranking in ERP

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CRM (17th), Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) (3rd), Local Government CRM (6th), Product Configuration and Quoting (7th), Warehouse Management (4th), Cloud HCM (7th), Financial Close Software (7th)

Microsoft Dynamics GP

Ranking in ERP

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the ERP category, the mindshare of Infor CloudSuite is 2.1%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Dynamics GP is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ERP Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Infor CloudSuite	2.1%
Microsoft Dynamics GP	1.3%
Other	96.6%

ERP

Featured Reviews

Adeel Ansari

Project Manager, Program at SPTLabtech

Integrated planning has improved document automation but reporting and user experience still need work

There are areas where Infor CloudSuite can improve. I have touched on the pros and key strengths of Infor CloudSuite, but end-user feedback indicates that there are several areas where the user experience can improve. For instance, when it comes to reporting, it comes with a very limited number of reports, and the standard reports are clunky, requiring a technical resource or developer to enhance or make them presentable. Another area is user experience; it takes several clicks to get to the information, and the user interface isn't that intuitive. Compared to other solutions, such as top-tier options such as Oracle or SAP, this stands out as an area needing improvement. When it comes to integration, Infor CloudSuite does offer a great deal of flexibility. It comes with APIs, so you can integrate with any third-party systems you may use. On that front, it's sufficient; however, it does require some specialized resources, as it's not a layman's job, and developers need to help with the integration. This is generally the case for any ERP. The user interface could indeed be better, and there is a steep learning curve for users; it takes time for them to get accustomed to Infor CloudSuite's interface and forms. However, once users adapt, it becomes easier and smoother to navigate. There are great features associated with Infor CloudSuite, such as DataViews and Birst as a business intelligence tool, which can be integrated with the basic product. Implementing Birst isn't plug-and-play; it requires a team of technical resources to execute. Additionally, there is a feature that allows integration with Excel, which can be installed by your IT team.

Read full review

reviewer2723988

Executive Director, Digital & Technology at a tech consulting company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integration and flexibility deliver outstanding business experiences with innovative platforms enhancements

Scale is a primary concern. If the product vision continues to serve small and mid-cap companies, they need to continue incorporating features into the out-of-the-box solution because small-caps typically lack budget for in-house IT organizations to customize and maintain systems. If they want to expand beyond mid-cap and enter the large-cap market, they need to consider balance and provide more customizability. This includes extending process flows through more APIs and building a more modular architecture with granular backend exposed via API. The process layer should allow clients to customize while invoking back-office APIs. The general perception positions Microsoft Dynamics GP in the middle of the market. Systems such as NetSuite and ServiceNow occupy the lower category, providing narrow use cases. Microsoft Dynamics GP offers more breadth and out-of-the-box capabilities at a slightly higher price point. At the top end, SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce offer extensive customizability at a premium price, suitable for large organizations with multiple transactions and customers. Microsoft Dynamics GP currently occupies a favorable position in the middle segment with limited competition.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Infor CloudSuite offers a comprehensive solution with integrated business intelligence and artificial intelligence capabilities."

"Infor CloudSuite Industrial is easy to setup. The built-in solution is already there, so we can start implementing it right away when we install it in an organization. After going through different test executions and workshops, any missing features can be added using Infor extension tables and other products. It will take at least eight to nine months to go live."

"The stability of the solution is perfect. I rate it a ten out of ten."

"Infor's environment—ION and Infor OS—is better than SAP's. The load time is shorter and Infor performs much better than SAP."

"Some valuable features include improved transparency in sales processes, which has been vital for our operations."

"What I appreciate most about Infor CloudSuite is the out-of-box standard functionality; it really can function to meet the needs of any company."

"The employee interface, specifically the UI, is one of the most valuable features in Infor CloudSuite, and after implementing it, I have seen numerous improvements in the UI space, including simplified navigation that has become easier with every CU, which is positive."

"It is a scalable solution."

More Infor CloudSuite pros

"It's enhanced by a subscription billing add-on, to efficiently automate billing and invoicing, particularly due to our substantial customer database."

"The fixed assets, payroll, the data module, and user-friendliness are most valuable."

"The solution is easy to use."

"Snowflake's ability to handle large queries efficiently is very beneficial, unlike other databases which can take a significant amount of time for similar tasks."

"The solution is easy to use and not complicated. Also, it is easy to get trained on. Also, there is good information available on the web. The GP community is quite broad and there are many blogs online."

"I haven't used it a lot, but the best thing is that the processes are very detailed."

"It is strong in integration."

"The system is easy to customize and has user-friendly access. "

More Microsoft Dynamics GP pros

Cons

"The price of the solution is not good. In Europe, it's difficult to find people who already know Infor, which was a problem during implementation."

"There are areas where Infor CloudSuite can improve. For instance, when it comes to reporting, it comes with a very limited number of reports, and the standard reports are clunky, requiring a technical resource or developer to enhance or make them presentable."

"Infor needs to work on its documentation. For example, if I need to create a business object deployment from LVN to element, the instructions for this are insufficient. Many specific use cases aren't covered in the manual."

"The disadvantages of Infor CloudSuite are related to Absence Management. There are too many setups for users to establish absence plans, formulas, and calculations."

"Currently, there are some challenges with handling large reports, possibly due to setup limits or issues with the solution."

"As far as pricing and licensing are concerned, more licenses are needed when companies grow with Infor CloudSuite."

"There should be better clarity and agreement on all interfaces and requirements before signing a contract. This would avoid unexpected costs and complications later on."

"Regarding integration, specific third-party tools are not accepted, for example, on the old version of IBM or Oracle."

More Infor CloudSuite cons

"This is now a legacy product, so they're phasing it out over time."

"Scale is a primary concern. If the product vision continues to serve small and mid-cap companies, they need to continue incorporating features into the out-of-the-box solution because small-caps typically lack budget for in-house IT organizations to customize and maintain systems."

"The biggest problem with GP is that it's not cloud based and it doesn't lend itself to subscription licensing. But Microsoft wants everything in the cloud and licensed on a subscription basis.Even tThough GP can be deployed on a cloud server, but basically, it's a Windows based product. It uses the older model and companies purchase the program and pay a 16-18 sixteen- eighteen percent annual renewal fee but Microsoft wants everybody to pay monthly or annual renewal fees on a subscription basis."

"Dynamics GP could be improved in terms of its usability and modernization."

"The purchase order and processing aspects of the solution should be improved."

"The issue we're encountering is that it's primarily designed for independent installations and not initially structured as a cloud-based solution, which has led to challenges with connectivity."

"As technology changes, I would say probably in the area of chart up account needs improvement because chart up account is a string. So if they make it more flexible."

"It requires a lot of expertise to implement."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm working for a German company, but I'm located in Portugal. In the German market, Infor's price isn't an issue for clients, but Infor is losing market share every year to SAP in Portugal. Portuguese clients find SAP more affordable. Infor needs to work on this."

"For on-premise installations, the licensing is yearly."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"The pricing is not built on a standard model."

"I feel it is not very cheap, very economical but also not very expensive."

"As for pricing, I secured a favorable deal at around $80,000 yearly for five years, but it was a one-time opportunity."

"The product is expensive. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The platform's pricing depends on the specific number of users."

"We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."

"In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."

"It is an affordable solution."

"The solution's price is steep."

"I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."

"Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."

"I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."

"For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

University

Construction Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Infor CloudSuite Industrial?

Some valuable features include improved transparency in sales processes, which has been vital for our operations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infor CloudSuite Industrial?

As for pricing, I secured a favorable deal at around $80,000 yearly for 5 years, but it was a one-time opportunity.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Infor CloudSuite Industrial?

While there are many advantages to using Infor CloudSuite Industrial, there are some drawbacks that could be addressed. Specifically, I believe there should be better clarity and agreement on all i...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Dynamics GP?

The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Dynamics GP?

D365 BC licensing SAAS model with subscription ranging $70/User/Month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Dynamics GP?

See all answers

Comparisons

Infor LN vs Infor CloudSuite

Compared 13% of the time

Infor M3 vs Infor CloudSuite

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Maximo vs Infor CloudSuite

Compared 8% of the time

Workday vs Infor CloudSuite

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Asset Management vs Infor CloudSuite

Compared 4% of the time

More Infor CloudSuite Competitors

Microsoft Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 20% of the time

SAP S/4HANA vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 19% of the time

SAP ERP vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 13% of the time

Odoo vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 12% of the time

Sage MAS vs Microsoft Dynamics GP

Compared 12% of the time

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infor CloudSuite

January 2026

Download Infor CloudSuite product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Dynamics GP

January 2026

Download Microsoft Dynamics GP product report

Also Known As

SyteLine

Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP

Overview

Infor CloudSuite is a comprehensive suite of cloud-based ERP software designed to streamline various business processes. It offers core functionalities such as financial management, supply chain management, production management, and CRM. The suite is tailored to specific industries, including manufacturing, food and beverage, healthcare, automotive, and distribution, each featuring industry-specific solutions. Being cloud-based, Infor CloudSuite provides scalability, automatic updates, and remote access, reducing the need for on-premise hardware and IT costs. It enhances efficiency through task automation, improved workflows, and data visibility, supporting data-driven decision-making.

Infor

Microsoft Dynamics GP is a complete enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution for small and medium-sized businesses. Dynamics GP helps you gain greater control over your financials, inventory, and operations. It’s easy to implement and use and empowers informed decisions that lead to business success.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

PRIDE Industries

Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall

Buyer's Guide

Infor CloudSuite vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

December 2025

Free Report: Infor CloudSuite vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

Find out what your peers are saying about Infor CloudSuite vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infor CloudSuite vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP report.

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.