We performed a comparison between Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle E-Business Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to use."
"You can track everything from beginning to end quite easily."
"It is a tried and tested ERP system which if used correctly, is definitely a very good program for managing all aspects of a business from customer sales, and receivables management, to payable management and finance reporting. So, it's super critical for any mid-sized company."
"I haven't used it a lot, but the best thing is that the processes are very detailed."
"The system is easy to customize and has user-friendly access. "
"The fixed assets, payroll, the data module, and user-friendliness are most valuable."
"The stability was reliable."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations."
"The GL and FAH modules have become real-deal players for an organization with many legacy systems that handle transactions and where there is a need to create accounting from these transactions."
"The procure-to-pay is core to our business and relevant to us."
"It's highly customizable."
"The on-premises solution has maturity in features but also flex fields."
"Oracle's technical support is better than others."
"Everyone in the company is quite used to the Oracle functionality."
"It was easy to set up the product."
"Technical support is good."
"Initially, we encountered challenges, particularly with users transitioning from their previous applications."
"With payroll, the payroll that they have offers US or Canadian tax. However, here, our tax payments are different from the US and Canada. It is very difficult to put in our tax tables. We need some customization. It should be readily available for any country to use according to their tax implications. The system should know different types of tax regimes around the world so that it can accommodate. It's a little bit rigid on that."
"As technology changes, I would say probably in the area of chart up account needs improvement because chart up account is a string. So if they make it more flexible."
"The issue we're encountering is that it's primarily designed for independent installations and not initially structured as a cloud-based solution, which has led to challenges with connectivity."
"As for room for improvement, they have different modules, project and analytical accounting, but it will be good to have that kind of part in the standard package. To have that additional reporting functionality where you can add an attribute or something, which you can report again. So you can analyze the cost by not just natural accounts but also by a project, without having to go through another module edit on top and then the other module edit on top. The more modules you add, sometimes it doesn't work that well. Additionally, it would be easier to have the solution on the cloud. That's our consideration. We are trying to move all our systems to the cloud, and GP is one of them that we are going to move in the next couple of years. I would rate the solution seven or seven point five out of ten."
"This is now a legacy product, so they're phasing it out over time."
"It still can be improved in web-based and build reporting. "
"It requires a lot of expertise to implement."
"The implementation took a long time but it was for many reasons. However, Oracle made sure that the solution and systems were up and running."
"I would rate the support for Oracle E-Business Suite a four out of five."
"Movement of CIP Inventory cannot be monitored in Inventory module when we are using the CIP Account or movement of CIP Inventory in Asset module, which is not flexible like Inventory module."
"Sometimes I have issues with the performance tuning."
"The EBS Design to some extent is still monolithic."
"Improving the reporting and user interface of Oracle ERP would be beneficial and is something that can be considered for future updates."
"Technical support is focused on-cloud versus on-premise customers."
"We need more user-friendly fast formulas for all HRMS modules."
Microsoft Dynamics GP is ranked 13th in ERP with 22 reviews while Oracle E-Business Suite is ranked 5th in ERP with 141 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics GP is rated 7.8, while Oracle E-Business Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics GP writes "A user-friendly solution for accounting and sales purchase model with all options in one frame". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle E-Business Suite writes "Offers valuable finance tools". Microsoft Dynamics GP is most compared with Microsoft Dynamics AX, Epicor ERP, SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA and Odoo, whereas Oracle E-Business Suite is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, SAP S/4HANA, SAP ERP, NetSuite ERP and Workday. See our Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Oracle E-Business Suite report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
