Inflectra Rapise vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

Inflectra and Parasoft are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Inflectra is ranked #20 with an average rating of 4.0, while Parasoft is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.7. Inflectra holds a 0.7% mindshare in TAt, compared to Parasoft’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.

Inflectra Rapise

Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews

864 Views
311 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

2,343 Views
562 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Inflectra Rapise

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

Parasoft SOAtest and Inflectra Rapise are competing products in the testing automation category. Inflectra Rapise is perceived as the superior choice due to its robust feature set and overall value.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest provides comprehensive test automation for APIs, excels in SOA and web services testing, and offers robust support for various protocols including JSON. Inflectra Rapise handles complex applications efficiently, supports a wide range of integrations, and offers flexibility across different platforms.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could improve by offering more competitive pricing, enhancing the flexibility of its deployment model, and simplifying its learning curve. Inflectra Rapise can benefit from expanding its user documentation, improving the robustness of its support for legacy systems, and refining its user interface for better ease of use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest features a structured deployment with strong documentation and efficient customer service. Inflectra Rapise offers an adaptable deployment model with quick setup and seamless integration into existing workflows, supported by responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest involves a higher initial investment with a focus on service-oriented testing, which yields a substantial ROI. Inflectra Rapise presents a more cost-effective setup with a compelling ROI driven by its flexible deployment and reduced costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra Rapise vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Parasoft SOAtest

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (32nd), AI Quality Assurance (2nd)

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), Functional Testing Tools (16th), API Testing Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 1.3%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Parasoft SOAtest	1.3%
Inflectra Rapise	0.7%
Other	98.0%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley

Software Consultant at The New Humanitarian

The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product

Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.

Read full review

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's pretty straightforward to set up."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."

"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."

"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."

"Automatic testing is the most valuable feature."

"We have seen a return on investment."

"If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest."

"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."

"Technical support is helpful."

"One of the most valuable features I found in Parasoft SOAtest is its ability to extend the product."

"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

Cons

"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."

"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."

"UI testing should be more in-depth."

"Reporting facilities can be better."

"During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time."

"In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices."

"Reports could be customized and more descriptive according to the user's or company's requirements."

"The product is very slow to start up, and that is a bit of a problem, actually."

"The summary reports could be improved."

"The performance could be a bit better."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Government

16%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?

I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ranorex Studio vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 33% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 28% of the time

UiPath Platform vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 21% of the time

NICE Robotic Automation vs Inflectra Rapise

Compared 19% of the time

More Inflectra Rapise Competitors

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 13% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 12% of the time

Coverity Static vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 7% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise

January 2026

Download Inflectra Rapise product report

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

January 2026

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Also Known As

Rapise

SOAtest

Overview

Inflectra Rapise is a robust software testing tool designed to automate testing for desktop, mobile, and web applications. It offers flexibility for testing scenarios and supports both functional and regression testing, suited for end-to-end test management needs.

Inflectra Rapise integrates seamlessly with existing technologies, providing a comprehensive environment for test automation. With its scriptless test automation approach, users can rapidly create tests without needing deep programming skills. This empowers teams to improve productivity and efficiency. Rapise's user-friendly interface and its ability to handle complex testing scenarios make it a preferred choice among testing professionals.

What are the critical features of Inflectra Rapise?

Keyword-Driven Testing: Enables easy reuse of test scripts with minimal effort.
Web Services Testing: Supports verification of web API performance and reliability.
Cross-Browser Support: Allows testing across different web browsers to ensure compatibility.
Data-Driven Testing: Facilitates the execution of tests with multiple data sets for thorough coverage.
Mobile Testing Support: Provides testing capabilities for iOS and Android applications.

What benefits should users look for?

Reduced Testing Time: Increased automation reduces the need for manual testing, saving time and resources.
Improved Accuracy: Automation minimizes human error, leading to more reliable testing outcomes.
Enhanced Collaboration: Easy integration with team collaboration tools enhances communication.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities, ensuring versatile use.

Inflectra Rapise is implemented across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and retail, where precise and efficient software testing is crucial. Its adaptability means it can meet diverse testing requirements, making it indispensable for projects demanding rigorous QA processes.

Inflectra

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Buyer's Guide

Inflectra Rapise vs. Parasoft SOAtest

January 2026

Free Report: Inflectra Rapise vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. Parasoft SOAtest and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Inflectra Rapise vs. Parasoft SOAtest report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.