Imperva Application Security Platform vs Kentik comparison

Imperva Application Securit...

Read 22 Kentik reviews

7,438 Views
744 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Imperva and Kentik compete in the network and application security domain. Imperva seems to have the upper hand in providing robust security features, while Kentik leads in network visibility and analytics.

Features: Imperva offers strong DDoS protection, extensive web application threat defenses, and advanced profiling policies. The platform is noted for its ability to deploy quickly and efficiently in cloud environments. Kentik provides detailed network visibility, flow data analysis, and customizable reporting options, enabling users to effectively monitor traffic patterns and optimize network performance.

Room for Improvement: Imperva can improve its interface and policy configuration management to offer more tailored app security. Enhancements in certificate management and reduction of false positives are needed. Kentik users desire better AI integration for troubleshooting and a more actionable approach in detecting traffic anomalies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imperva is flexible in deploying across public and hybrid clouds, though on-premises support is limited. Customer service experiences vary. Kentik is built for on-premise and private cloud use, offering solid infrastructure support but could enhance its instructional resources and user interface.

Pricing and ROI: Imperva's pricing is seen as high, contingent on licensing and deployment type, offering significant ROI in threat mitigation but can be costly for smaller enterprises. Kentik's pricing is competitive, varying by deployment size and scope, providing ROI through enhanced network visibility and performance management.

To learn more, read our detailed Imperva Application Security Platform vs. Kentik Report (Updated: August 2026).

Imperva Application Security Platform vs. Kentik

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

5.8

Imperva boosts security, reduces manual interventions, yielding quick ROI, especially in banking, though initial costs can be high.

Sentiment score

5.2

Kentik users benefit from reduced costs, enhanced security, and efficiency, simplifying renewal decisions due to significant perceived value.

They know how much money they are losing while the system is down, so by increasing the possibility of not having a down website or web application, return on investment can be calculated easily.

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

I was able to save over seven million dollars last year as return on investment in the company.

For more quotes and insights, download the Imperva Application Security Platform report

Senior Cybersecurity Consultant at Cyberoutcome Limited

I have seen a return on investment with Imperva Application Security Platform, as it is generally associated with time savings, because the review of alerts and the visibility it gives saves us significant operational time.

Diego Uchofen

Ingeniero Preventa at Imperia

If we had, for example, a contracted capacity from Vivo of 50 GB and we were using 40, with Kentik we reduced this usage from 40 to 20.

Network Engineer at a media company with 51-200 employees

In production environments, especially for service providers on IP networks and data centers, Kentik helps in reducing the time to identify and resolve issues.

For more quotes and insights, download the Kentik report

BDM at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

I believe the return on investment has been mainly time savings in performing troubleshooting.

Dmartins Martins

Network Analyst at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.0

The Imperva Application Security Platform's support is praised for responsiveness but criticized for inconsistencies, especially between cloud and on-premises environments.

Sentiment score

6.6

Kentik's customer service is praised for proactive support, quick responses, strong communication, and effective issue identification and resolution.

I would rate the technical support of Imperva DDoS as ten.

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

They need to work faster on the response time because of issues of urgent replies.

For more quotes and insights, download the Imperva Application Security Platform report

Senior Cybersecurity Consultant at Cyberoutcome Limited

Responsive support addressing urgent needs.

P Mayuranathan

Cybersecurity Consultant at Accenture Singapore Services Pte Ltd

I have mostly used forums for any support needed because the setup is straightforward and the documentation is quite good.

For more quotes and insights, download the Kentik report

BDM at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

They have monthly calls and discuss the product roadmap with us to determine what is needed.

Shubham-Saxena

Network Engineer III at Fortanix

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.4

Imperva Application Security Platform offers scalable solutions for various organizations, with cloud deployment preferred despite some pricing and performance challenges.

Sentiment score

6.6

Kentik is highly scalable, effectively manages diverse network sizes, and simplifies scaling with Kubernetes integration, despite credit dependencies.

99% of customers are using the cloud version of Imperva DDoS protection, so they just purchase the new license and scale as needed.

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

I have not even needed support after deployment, since it has remained stable.

Nigus Machin Amare

CTO at Malam Engineering PLC

It is easy to always scale to add more users.

For more quotes and insights, download the Imperva Application Security Platform report

Senior Cybersecurity Consultant at Cyberoutcome Limited

Kentik's integration with Kubernetes makes scaling easier.

BDM at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Kentik's scalability is effective; the platform can handle these large volumes.

Dmartins Martins

Network Analyst at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees

Kentik's scalability depends on how it is contracted.

For more quotes and insights, download the Kentik report

Network Engineer at a media company with 51-200 employees

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.9

Imperva Application Security Platform is praised for stability and reliability, with minor issues occurring mainly during high traffic.

Sentiment score

8.1

Kentik users enjoy stable performance and reliability, with quick resolutions to occasional minor outages and bugs.

It is also a stable product without much glitch or downtime.

KS10

Senior Presales Consultant at Techlab security

One notable drawback is that, unlike Fortinet, which offers fast track labs and continuous enablement, Imperva Application Security Platform lacks lab access and fast track labs for enablement and product advertising.

Nigus Machin Amare

CTO at Malam Engineering PLC

We experienced downtime or crashes with Imperva Application Security Platform when traffic went really strong or fast because people tried to get tickets.

Alianamarie Lachica

Soc Analyst at Cineplex Inc

For more quotes and insights, download the Imperva Application Security Platform report

In production, however, dimensioning of the underlying platforms is something to be mindful of.

For more quotes and insights, download the Kentik report

BDM at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Based on stability, I would give Kentik a nine.

Shubham-Saxena

Network Engineer III at Fortanix

I can say it is so great for us because if we configure it with Flowspec, the orchestration that we use, which is Kentik, makes the decision and automatically forwards the traffic to another position that we have in our network, or outgoing that we use.

Daniel A Júnior

Telecomm Analyst at a tech company with 11-50 employees

Room For Improvement

Imperva Application Security Platform needs better integration, simpler dashboards, improved AI, and enhanced user interface for higher satisfaction.

Kentik users request better AI reliability, intuitive alerts, improved UX, simplified API, report customization, cost reduction, and detailed documentation.

To convince my clients, a purely on-prem solution would be ideal since they are financial institutions.

Nigus Machin Amare

CTO at Malam Engineering PLC

Maybe Imperva DDoS could use endpoints to get information about the attacks before they commence from the endpoint level or establish cooperation with endpoint vendors to share this information.

For more quotes and insights, download the Imperva Application Security Platform report

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Regarding return on investment, ROI, I can say it is noticeable with Imperva Application Security Platform.

KS10

Senior Presales Consultant at Techlab security

More work is required to integrate AI for troubleshooting, simplifying root cause analysis, and providing suggested solutions for network issues.

For more quotes and insights, download the Kentik report

BDM at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

It needed to be a bit easier for new users and have slightly more customized reports.

Dmartins Martins

Network Analyst at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees

Currently, the way I'm configuring it uses reactive alerts, which means alerts are triggered when an issue occurs. I would prefer more proactive alerts in the future.

Theeni Rajendran

Epicor Engineer at Sunway Group

Setup Cost

Imperva's Application Security Platform has high, complex pricing, yet some find it competitive for its security benefits and enterprise flexibility.

Kentik offers competitive pricing with flexible contracts, though costs may vary by enterprise size and usage, requiring substantial budgets.

I would rate the pricing of Imperva DDoS as five, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive.

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

the setup cost was high, with the hardware installation in the data center being particularly expensive.

reviewer2835783

Cyber Security Product Owner at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

We have noticed faster response times and fewer security alerts because after doing some custom policy tuning, everything seemed to be aligned and we have fewer attacks to monitor and fewer alerts to monitor.

For more quotes and insights, download the Imperva Application Security Platform report

Senior Cybersecurity Consultant at Cyberoutcome Limited

The pricing is good and aligns with the market target.

ADRIANA SALDARRIAGA TOBON

Sales Manager at IFX NEtworks

Kentik’s pricing is competitive in the marketplace.

BDM at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees

Later, the prices are very high to maintain all the functionality blocks.

For more quotes and insights, download the Kentik report

Network Engineer at a media company with 51-200 employees

Valuable Features

Imperva Application Security Platform offers robust threat protection, user-friendly interface, and comprehensive reporting for enhanced web security management.

Kentik offers comprehensive network monitoring, real-time analytics, security insights, customizable dashboards, and automation for efficient network management.

The API security feature is particularly valuable because most attackers do not try to come in from where it is expected.

For more quotes and insights, download the Imperva Application Security Platform report

Senior Cybersecurity Consultant at Cyberoutcome Limited

If someone attempts to access the server, the WAF blocks that SSRF alert, or RCE, Remote Code Execution alert, blocking immediately based on the signature, not only by the payload or the IP address.

Sayan Gupta

SOC Analyst L1 at CMS-IT-SERVICES-PVT-LTD

It reduces the DDoS attacks and reduces the attacks from threat actors, including SQL Injection and zero-day attacks, by using dynamic application profiling from Imperva.

reviewer2818005

IT Security Analyst & Engineer (Project, Remote) Australia-Europe at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Kentik report

Network Engineer at a media company with 51-200 employees

This allows for better understanding of whether there is a critical ongoing case related to incoming traffic, such as a DDoS event, which is crucial for a service provider dealing with numerous customers.

Leonardo Miquelini

Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Kentik has positively impacted our organization because when something happens, we use Kentik to analyze the problem and it brings us a faster solution to the problem, and the troubleshooting is clearer.

Daniel A Júnior

Telecomm Analyst at a tech company with 11-50 employees

Categories and Ranking

Imperva Application Securit...

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

147

Ranking in other categories

CDN (2nd), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (1st), Bot Management (1st), API Security (1st)

Kentik

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

7th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of Imperva Application Security Platform is 8.0%, up from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kentik is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Imperva Application Security Platform	8.0%
Kentik	1.3%
Other	90.7%

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

reviewer2818155

Senior Associate at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Application protection has improved and reporting and dashboards still need refinement

I believe Imperva Application Security Platform should have a more interactive wizard. While the dashboard is good, it could be more eye-catching. Based on my perspective, I recommend modifying the dashboards, especially the main dashboard where I can see the traffic hit count, alerts, and other latest information. In terms of reporting, I find it challenging to create reports; in my earlier days, it was difficult. Over time, I have learned how to create reports, but it should be easier to do so. I have used other tools such as firewalls or SolarWinds, where creating a report is straightforward and does not take much time, unlike in Imperva, where I have to add many elements. Modifications in the integration aspects would also be beneficial.

Read full review

Traffic insights have reduced transit costs and support secure, direct connections with providers

Network Engineer at a media company with 51-200 employees

The best features that Kentik offers are the ability to identify traffic end-to-end and to know which transit is used, if it goes through any other transit, to see the entire flow, from the subscriber to the content provider and vice versa, from the content provider to the subscriber.I can also determine whether it is symmetric or asymmetric traffic, and if it goes through any provider that has some kind of bottleneck. That is very important. Regarding the security part, which is also possible to handle through Kentik, you can configure it in a way that makes the network more secure and reduces the amount of dirty traffic or attacks received. Kentik has had a high positive impact on my organization. Besides the cost reduction, it has been possible to perform troubleshooting more effectively, and also regarding DDoS-related attacks. In addition to cost reduction, we had a more reliable connection. Since the moment we identified that it was possible to have a direct connection with content providers like CDN77, Cloudflare, and Akamai, we established a direct connection there through a PNI with these content providers, making the network less dependent on an IP transit provider.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	88
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	70

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Which Web Application Firewall (WAF) would you recommend? R&S or Imperva?

Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Imperva DDoS?

The pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Imperva DDoS are reasonable for the amount of technical capabilities provided. I would rate the pricing of Imperva DDoS as five, where one is very cheap a...

What needs improvement with Imperva DDoS?

I would like to see improvements in the pooling of threats and attacks, possibly to enlarge the scale of indicators of compromise. For example, the initiation of an attack on the endpoint level cou...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kentik?

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing has been limited because I was not responsible for that in my company, but I have spoken with my boss, and he reported that the licensing mode...

What needs improvement with Kentik?

I do not currently use Kentik's anomaly detection. I had communication with Kentik's technical support through a WhatsApp group. When I faced any issues or there were problems with my Kentik collec...

What is your primary use case for Kentik?

I'm using Kentik for my own internal use. My primary use case is to monitor our equipment and to get a more detailed view of where our inbound and outbound traffic is going.

Cloudflare vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

Akamai vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Link11 vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

Fastly vs Imperva Application Security Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Imperva Application Security Platform Competitors

DX Spectrum vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs Kentik

Compared 5% of the time

More Kentik Competitors

Product Reports

Imperva Application Security Platform

Download Imperva Application Security Platform product report

Imperva Application Security Platform report

Download Kentik product report

Also Known As

Imperva Bot Management, Imperva Web Application Firewall, Imperva API Security

No data available

Overview

Imperva Application Security Platform delivers comprehensive and continuous web threat protection. Renowned for its ease of use, it shields web applications and databases from various cyber threats while integrating seamlessly with cloud and on-premises environments.

Imperva Application Security Platform protects web environments by offering advanced security measures against threats like DDoS attacks, SQL injections, and cross-site scripting. As a robust web application firewall, it provides extensive monitoring and bot management capabilities. The platform integrates content delivery networks for enhanced performance and scalability, while real-time traffic analysis ensures consistent protection. Despite its strengths, improvements can be made in policy management and customization options. Users seek better integration with third-party tools and more competitive pricing models. The inclusion of AI for enhanced analytics is also anticipated.

What are the key features of Imperva Application Security Platform?

Correlated Attack Validation: Enhances threat assessment by linking related security events.
Threat Radar: Offers visibility into potential and ongoing threats.
Virtual Patching: Provides protection against vulnerabilities without immediate code changes.
IncapRules: Allows creation of custom security policies.
DDoS Protection: Defends against large-scale distributed denial-of-service attacks.
CDN Integration: Improves content delivery speed and reliability.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

User-Friendly Administration: Simplifies setup and ongoing management tasks.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth operation with existing infrastructure.
Comprehensive Threat Protection: Shields digital assets from a wide range of threats.
Hands-On Support: Provides timely and effective customer service assistance.

Imperva Application Security Platform is implemented in industries needing strong database and application protection. Companies use it to enforce geolocation restrictions and manage bots, benefiting sectors like finance and e-commerce where data security and threat monitoring are critical. Its ability to protect and ensure data accessibility makes it integral to business operations prioritizing cyber resilience.

Imperva

Kentik provides real-time visibility into network infrastructure, focusing on monitoring, data visualization, and flow analysis to manage traffic patterns efficiently.

With robust analytics capabilities, Kentik offers insights into BGP peering status, aids in DDoS detection, and allows for detailed telemetry through its intuitive interface. The platform's SaaS nature simplifies operations by eliminating server maintenance concerns. Multi-vendor support and synthetic testing enhance network security and performance by simulating customer scenarios, while its API offers automation for querying and reporting tasks.

What are the key features of Kentik?

Real-Time Visibility: Monitors network infrastructure effectively.
Data Visualization: Offers powerful tools for viewing complex data.
Flow Analysis: Analyzes traffic flow for optimal management.
BGP Peering Insights: Provides in-depth peering status checks.
DDoS Alerting: Notifies about potential DDoS threats.
Data Explorer: Aids in understanding traffic patterns.
Synthetic Testing: Simulates scenarios to enhance security and performance.

What benefits can be found in user reviews?

Automation: Users value the flexibility of its API for automating tasks.
Ease of Use: SaaS model streamlines user engagement, eliminating server maintenance.
Flexibility: Report customization and query settings are highly appreciated.
Enhanced Observability: Telemetry and multi-vendor support increase oversight.

Industries implement Kentik for network monitoring, traffic management, and flow data analysis across both on-prem and cloud setups. It proves valuable for detecting DDoS events, managing peering relationships, and optimizing costs, besides managing CDN configurations and performing synthetic tests in diverse environments.

Sample Customers

Hitachi, BNZ, Bitstamp, Moz, InnoGames, BTCChina, Wix, LivePerson, Zillow and more.

Pandora, Yelp, Neustar, Box, University of Washington, Zoom, Tata, and Cogent.

Imperva Application Security Platform vs. Kentik