Immuta vs Imperva Data Security Fabric comparison

Immuta and Imperva are both solutions in the Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) category. Immuta is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Imperva is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.2. Immuta holds a 1.7% mindshare in DSPM, compared to Imperva’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Immuta users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Imperva users who would recommend it.

Immuta

Read 5 Immuta reviews

1,204 Views
578 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Imperva Data Security Fabric

Read 64 Imperva Data Security Fabric reviews

4,612 Views
969 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Immuta

Imperva Data Security Fabric

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 21, 2025

Imperva Data Security Fabric and Immuta compete in data security and management, with Immuta having an upper hand due to a robust feature set valued by users despite Imperva's appreciated pricing and support.

Features: Imperva Data Security Fabric offers real-time threat detection, robust policy enforcement, and comprehensive audit logs, focusing on data protection. Immuta provides advanced data access controls, automated data tagging, and privacy enforcement, enhancing data governance and compliance automation.

Room for Improvement: Imperva could improve its intuitive interface, integration capabilities, and reduce false positives in threat detection. Immuta may enhance the clarity of permission management, cloud platform integration, and user interface navigation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imperva Data Security Fabric boasts a straightforward setup that may require ongoing support to unlock its full potential. Immuta is praised for seamless integration and strong customer support, enhancing the user experience.

Pricing and ROI: Imperva Data Security Fabric is seen as cost-effective, offering good ROI through its security features. Immuta, while potentially higher in setup cost, provides compelling ROI due to its governance capabilities that users find valuable.

To learn more, read our detailed Immuta vs. Imperva Data Security Fabric Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Immuta vs. Imperva Data Security Fabric

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Immuta

Ranking in Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

13th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Governance (21st), AI Data Analysis (22nd)

Imperva Data Security Fabric

Ranking in Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Security (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) category, the mindshare of Immuta is 1.7%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Imperva Data Security Fabric is 2.0%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Imperva Data Security Fabric	2.0%
Immuta	1.7%
Other	96.3%

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

Featured Reviews

Dibyajyoti Rath

Data Analyst at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Centralized access control has secured sensitive data and supports compliant self-service analytics

Immuta is very helpful, but it can be improved in a few areas. The initial setup and policy design can be complex and require a learning curve. The user interface could be more interactive, especially for non-technical users. Policy troubleshooting and debugging could be easier with better visibility into why access was allowed or denied. Performance optimization and deeper integration with more tools could make it even better. Additional improvements would strengthen Immuta further. The documentation and real-world examples would help teams onboard faster. More out-of-the-box policy templates could reduce setup time. Improved policy simulation and testing would help teams understand the impact of changes before applying them. Stronger alerting and monitoring features would help quickly identify access issues. Finally, more end-user training and simplified workflows would make it easier for business users to adopt.

Read full review

Samuel Adeyemi

Information Security Analyst at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Real-time data monitoring and policy-based activity blocking enhance security and awareness

The development mode on the platform needs improvement. For example, the archiving functionalities should be enhanced to allow easy conversion of archived logs into CSV or Excel formats for data analysis. When I need to investigate with archived data, the inability to export to these formats can be limiting. Making this process easier would be beneficial for reviews.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Instead of manually tagging data, Immuta’s auto-discovery capability identifies sensitive information, such as country labels, gender information, and other personal data."

"The tool's most valuable feature is restriction."

"Immuta has had a very positive impact on our organization, helping us strengthen data security by ensuring sensitive data is only accessible to the right users, simplifying compliance with clear audit trails and consistent policy enforcement, reducing manual access management to save time for data and security teams, and enabling safe self-service analytics so our team can access data faster while still meeting governance and regulatory requirements."

"What I appreciate the most is its user-friendliness."

"All features available are good."

"I would overall rate the Imperva SecureSphere Database Security as a product very positively with a score of 10 out of 10."

"The beauty of it is that it provides segregation of duties. Typically, in the traditional environment, DBAs administer the database, and they have too much access. We are in the process of implementing other Oracle solutions, and it brings some kind of segregation. Just because someone is a DBA does not mean that he or she should have access to all of the data. Some of the data can be masked so that privacy and security are enhanced, especially when it is customer data for an institution like a bank."

"The centralization of the data is probably the most useful feature because we span multiple database technologies. We also find the GBDI portion of it very helpful."

"The time to detect vulnerabilities has gotten a lot quicker."

"The audit feature is great. It is totally encrypted."

"The technical support for Imperva is super, super, super."

"Ability to send event monitoring and administrative activities."

"The most valuable features include a great level of automation, machine learning for attack validation, and a very flexible and comfortable management console."

More Imperva Data Security Fabric pros

Cons

"Immuta is very helpful, but it can be improved in a few areas."

"There is room for improvement in enhancing the monitoring capabilities."

"We have had some challenges with their support when we were migrating to the cloud version. We we had some issues, and it took us several attempts to get a proper responses as part of that migration."

"The implementation process with Immuta was quite challenging, primarily due to issues related to database handling and the syncing of user groups."

"Immuta is behind in updating upgrades and software releases."

"The updates could be better."

"There are specific missing features in the Imperva SecureSphere Database Security that I would like to see included or enhanced."

"They can maybe look at its pricing model. Its pricing could be cheaper for the African countries or developing economies."

"The only challenge I see is that SecureSphere is deployed on servers or databases which are held on physical infrastructure. However, there are databases which are hosted on cloud platforms and Imperva has a separate tool altogether for that, not SecureSphere."

"Imperva needs to improve their cloud capabilities."

"The GUI is bad."

"Imperva SecureSphere Database Security could improve the database defense feature called camouflage. This feature was responsible for the data mask but now it does not work well and we need another solution. All our banks have teams that are regarded with care and they need to mask sensitive data in order to provide testing to developers."

"I'd like to see some sort of solution for storage."

More Imperva Data Security Fabric cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Immuta's pricing is expensive."

"The product’s price is reasonable compared to other products."

"We have all the licenses, which we pay for annually. The price is a little high, but the product is good."

"Imperva is too expensive for small and medium-sized enterprises. They're missing out on technology that helps them manage their data security better. Data security is essential because even the strongest network may be attacked from the inside without it."

"Imperva SecureSphere Database Security was quite expensive several years ago, but now they provide a subscription plan for licensing. It is available now for smaller and medium-sized companies, not only large enterprises."

"The price is very high but compared to the price of the overall solution, then I think it's a good deal because the solution itself is great."

"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and it is a good value for the money."

"The pricing is reasonable and competitive."

"The price of the solution is reasonable. The cost of the solution depends on the customer, they have the flex protect licensing which can vary in price."

More Imperva Data Security Fabric pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Immuta?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Immuta?

My main use case for Immuta is data governance. In my project, which is a data governance project, I use Immuta as a centralized data access management tool. A specific example of how I use Immuta ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Immuta?

My advice for others considering Immuta would be to plan your policies carefully. Think through roles, data sensitivity, and use cases before setup. Invest in training to ensure both technical and ...

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

My recommendation is Imperva.

See all answers

How does IBM Guardium Data Protection compare with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security?

IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is a solution for database security from IBM that gives complete visibility, control, and analysis to secure sensitive data and comply with regulations. IBM S...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Imperva SecureSphere Database Security?

It is not cheaper, but based on the feature, it is okay.

See all answers

Comparisons

Satori vs Immuta

Compared 14% of the time

Privacera vs Immuta

Compared 12% of the time

Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform vs Immuta

Compared 9% of the time

SecuPi Data Security Platform vs Immuta

Compared 9% of the time

Collibra Platform vs Immuta

Compared 9% of the time

More Immuta Competitors

IBM Security Guardium Data Protection vs Imperva Data Security Fabric

Compared 50% of the time

Oracle Audit Vault vs Imperva Data Security Fabric

Compared 11% of the time

DataSunrise Database Security vs Imperva Data Security Fabric

Compared 5% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Imperva Data Security Fabric

Compared 4% of the time

Trustwave DbProtect vs Imperva Data Security Fabric

Compared 3% of the time

More Imperva Data Security Fabric Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Governance

January 2026

Download Immuta product report

Buyer's Guide

Imperva Data Security Fabric

January 2026

Download Imperva Data Security Fabric product report

Also Known As

No data available

Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, jSonar, Imperva's Data Security Posture Management

Overview

Immuta ensures secure, controlled access to sensitive data, excelling in data governance, regulatory compliance, and privacy. Key features include dynamic policy enforcement, fine-grained access control, and seamless integration with diverse data sources. Users report improved operational efficiency and enhanced teamwork.

Immuta

Imperva Data Security Fabric provides cutting-edge database security, featuring capabilities like activity monitoring, web application firewalls, and real-time alerting for comprehensive data protection.

Imperva Data Security Fabric focuses on securing databases through advanced monitoring, logging, and user behavior analysis. With features designed for ease of configuration, it effectively blocks unauthorized access and maintains detailed audit logs. Integration with other systems and automated reporting enhance vulnerability assessments and compliance efforts. Imperva's data discovery, classification, and masking capabilities strengthen security by managing user rights and uncovering vulnerabilities, making it ideal for protecting sensitive data and supporting forensic and compliance needs.

What are the key features of Imperva Data Security Fabric?

Database Activity Monitoring: Tracks and analyzes database transactions to detect suspicious activities.
Web Application Firewall: Shields applications from web-based threats and attacks.
Real-Time Alerting: Provides instant notifications of potential security breaches.
Ease of Configuration: Simplifies initial setup and ongoing management.
Unauthorized Access Blocking: Prevents unwarranted entry into critical systems.
Detailed Audit Logs: Offers comprehensive tracking of user and system actions.
Integration with Other Systems: Merges seamlessly with existing security infrastructure.
Automated Reporting: Facilitates streamlined vulnerability assessments and compliance checks.
Data Discovery and Classification: Identifies and categorizes sensitive data for better protection.
Data Masking: Secures data by concealing sensitive information from unauthorized users.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for?

Enhanced Security: Robust features to safeguard against data breaches and vulnerabilities.
Regulatory Compliance: Assists in meeting regulatory obligations with detailed reporting and audit capabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Automation and integration streamline processes and reduce manual efforts.
Scalability: Suitable for organizations needing to secure growing volumes of data across dynamic environments.
Cost Management: Maximizes protection capabilities to justify licensing and support costs.

Imperva Data Security Fabric is widely used across industries like finance and government, focusing on database security, activity monitoring, and user behavior analysis. It is essential for detecting unauthorized access and preventing data breaches while ensuring compliance. Financial institutions and government agencies leverage its capabilities to maintain data integrity and monitor database activities, implementing firewalls and vulnerability assessments that secure on-premises and cloud environments.

Imperva

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

BlueCross BlueShield, eHarmony, EMF Broadcasting, GE Healthcare, Metro Bank, The Motley Fool, Siemens

Buyer's Guide

Immuta vs. Imperva Data Security Fabric

December 2025

Free Report: Immuta vs. Imperva Data Security Fabric

Find out what your peers are saying about Immuta vs. Imperva Data Security Fabric and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Immuta vs. Imperva Data Security Fabric report.

See our list of best Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) vendors.

We monitor all Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.