We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

IFS Applications vs JD Edwards EnterpriseOne comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Applications vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Some of the strengths are Enterprise Management Solutions and the series of Management solutions which is number one in Gartner's report and has been for the last five years.""The best feature is the maintenance module, which is essentially an industry-specific workflow designed with a manufacturing module as per industry standards. It's very precise and specific without having complex functionalities. It's straightforward. Field Service Management is definitely a wonderful product that IFS has developed because it caters to field services. The energy and utility sectors can answer their business needs using the software.""The product is quite flexible.""The solution overall is very versatile and flexible, especially compared to other products.""One of our favorite features is the "Info-Zone", which provides operational intelligence in flight and in context to guide both business users and support teams to productivity."

More IFS Applications Pros →

"The solution is very customizable according to business needs.""With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now.""I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing.""It is highly configurable. You have a choice in terms of how you want to run it. You can run it in your own data center, in a private cloud, or in a public cloud. The choice is really up to the customer.""The most valuable feature is the user experience, where you can create your own queries, it sends you alerts, and it's very flexible.""The interface is very user-friendly.""We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne.""The solution is stable."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Pros →

Cons
"It would be ideal if, in the future, the product could incorporate IoT and blockchain elements. We'd like to explore more of these types of features going forward.""The integration is a bit complex, and post-implementation support services need to be improved. They have a service center based out of Sri Lanka. The support aspect is good, but the response time is a little slower than we anticipated. In the next release, it would be better if Warehouse Management could be improvised. They have a product line that's a data warehouse management system, but it's still premature and requires a bit of enhancement.""We would like to see AI-driven CSI functions built into the tool that would allow us to quickly tie our improvement goals to metrics and activities, so Assyst will suggest the next steps to help us get closer to our goals.""There are certain digital features that need to be incorporated, such as IOP.""The user interface can be improved. When you're clicking through the screens, there are some icons or symbols that really need updating and would be more useful and noticeable if they are aesthetically pleasing."

More IFS Applications Cons →

"The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved.""The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics.""Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS.""If they can research and make the installation part easier or more user-friendly, it would be nice.""Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for.""We originally used EnterpriseOne for preventative maintenance, but it is not very good at that so we migrated to Maximo for that task.""I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries.""We found that the system was unable to address many of our concerns, especially when it comes to project management."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Ask for all-inclusive pricing, as they are pretty flexible if you ask for custom models."
  • "Pricing is an area that could be improved. They could be more competitive."
  • "IFS Applications is expensive software, but it's on par with SAP and Oracle. It's for large enterprises and government entities and not for small and medium-sized enterprises. They have one licensing model, but if you want to have a module-specific license, they provide component-based licenses. Unlike SAP and Oracle, it doesn't have different levels of licensing. It's one level of licensing."
  • More IFS Applications Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing is for mid-market businesses, where it is cheaper than Oracle Cloud, EBS, or SAP."
  • "The price of the solution is not cheap. However, it is priced average amongst competitors."
  • "There is an annual license for this solution."
  • "It depends on the number of users and the modules that you want to buy. It is licensed on a perpetual license basis. You buy the license costs upfront, and then there is maintenance for support that you pay every year, which is typically about 20%."
  • "The solution is really expensive."
  • "The licensing costs are on a yearly basis, and there are no additional costs."
  • More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
    564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    IFS PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS ARE BEST-FIT FOR THE FOLLOWING INDUSTRIES: AEROSPACE & DEFENSE – MILITARY OPERATORS, DEFENSE IN- SERVICE SUPPORT, COMMERCIAL AVIATION OPERATORS, 3RD PARTY MRO, A&D… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The best feature is the maintenance module, which is essentially an industry-specific workflow designed with a manufacturing module as per industry standards. It's very precise and specific without… more »
    Top Answer: 
    IFS Applications is expensive software, but it's on par with SAP and Oracle. It's for large enterprises and government entities and not for small and medium-sized enterprises. They have one licensing… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The deployment is handled through a third party; in which we have a team of consultants. They handle everything, from the setup, to the implementation, to the training. My advice to others is that… more »
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 54 in ERP
    Views
    4,605
    Comparisons
    3,200
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    635
    Rating
    7.8
    6th
    out of 54 in ERP
    Views
    7,318
    Comparisons
    5,992
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    584
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Assyst
    Learn More
    Overview

    IFS develops and delivers cloud enterprise software for companies around the world who manufacture and distribute goods, build and maintain assets, and manage service-focused operations. Within our single platform, our industry specific products are innately connected to a single data model and use embedded digital innovation so that our customers can be their best when it really matters to their customers – at the Moment of Service™​​​​​​​. The industry expertise of our people and of our growing ecosystem, together with a commitment to deliver value at every single step, has made IFS a recognized leader and the most recommended supplier in our sector. Our team of 4,500 employees every day live our values of agility, trustworthiness and collaboration in how we support our 10,000+ customers. Learn more about how our enterprise software solutions can help your business today at ifs.com.

    Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is an integrated applications suite of comprehensive enterprise resource planning software that combines business value, standards-based technology, and deep industry experience into a business solution with a low total cost of ownership. EnterpriseOne is the first ERP solution to run all applications on Apple iPad. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne also delivers mobile applications.
    Offer
    Learn more about IFS Applications
    Learn more about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Sample Customers
    Carlsberg, Pukka, Aston Martin, Sky, China Airlines, Cimcorp, Mini, Pepsi.
    TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Government5%
    REVIEWERS
    Energy/Utilities Company20%
    Construction Company20%
    Retailer10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company36%
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Energy/Utilities Company4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise45%
    Large Enterprise9%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise48%
    Find out what your peers are saying about IFS Applications vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IFS Applications is ranked 8th in ERP with 5 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 6th in ERP with 9 reviews. IFS Applications is rated 7.8, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IFS Applications writes "A cloud-based ERP solution with a useful maintenance module, but post-implementation support could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "User-friendly, flexible and easy to customize, and offers good support for different industries". IFS Applications is most compared with SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite, ServiceNow, Microsoft Dynamics NAV and Infor M3, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with Oracle E-Business Suite, JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle ERP Cloud and NetSuite ERP. See our IFS Applications vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.

    See our list of best ERP vendors and best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.

    We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.