IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

IDERA and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. IDERA is ranked #78, while OpenText is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0. IDERA holds a 0.4% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 33% of IDERA users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Read 3 IDERA SQL Safe Backup reviews

513 Views
431 Comparison Views

33% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,775 Views
1,527 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and IDERA SQL Safe Backup are two leading data protection solutions in the market, competing in the realm of data security and management. IDERA SQL Safe Backup is seen as superior in terms of features, making it more valuable for many users.

Features: OpenText Data Protector scores high with its comprehensive disaster recovery, extensive platform support, and scalable architecture. IDERA SQL Safe Backup provides advanced compression, encryption, and efficient data management capabilities, offering superior data protection.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector users seek enhanced performance, better integration with newer technologies, and simplified usability. IDERA SQL Safe Backup users highlight the need for an improved scheduling mechanism, more intuitive error reporting, and a more refined user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector presents a complex deployment process but offers comprehensive customer service. IDERA SQL Safe Backup is easier to deploy and has reliable support, though users report variability in the quality of assistance.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector offers flexible pricing models but comes with higher initial setup costs, resulting in a gradual but steady return on investment. IDERA SQL Safe Backup is valued for its lower setup costs and quicker ROI, with users feeling their investment is justified by faster realization of benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

78th

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (18th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of IDERA SQL Safe Backup is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Data Protector	0.8%
IDERA SQL Safe Backup	0.4%
Other	98.8%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

SeniorDB3550

Senior DBA Lead at a government with 10,001+ employees

It has reduced our backup time, however backups do get skipped

I would like to see the pieces that they have put in the web only to be put into the thick client sitting on the desktop client. They moved a lot of the features to their web-based version of it. Because of the large number of databases that we have along with our backup, their web product can't handle it. So, we can't use it. So, we are missing out on a lot of the new features. The way the filtering goes, if you filter on your view, there is no indication that you have made a selection. Unless you can remember day-to-day that you may have something deselected or selected, your view may be different than you expect, and there is no visual indication of it.

Read full review

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has reduced our backup time and simplified our backup processes across all the servers."

"The compression, because it drastically reduces the disk space."

"Data Protector's GUI is the most useful feature."

"If you have an idea of what you are doing, it's very flexible and very stable."

"Ability to automatically detect and secure new data sources without requiring manual configuration intervention."

"The dashboards in Micro Focus Data Protector are very good. They are similar to the dashboards in Veeam Backup & Replication."

"This solution is quite stable because we have only three users."

"In one of the projects involving a database and UCMDB integration, we needed to manage a large database. We used the scheduling feature in Data Protector to automate backups."

"I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Data Protector is very good at automation. From the time of the backup, verification, and copy to tape, it is very good. I don't need to touch it, it will do it by itself."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"I would like to see the pieces that they have put in the web only to be put into the thick client sitting on the desktop client."

"The way the filtering goes, if you filter on your view, there is no indication that you have made a selection."

"Make sure you check your backups on a regular basis. Backups do get missed with this tool, for whatever reason."

"The new backup systems are using new mechanisms for the recovery phases; for example, VM, recovery and testing the backup before recovering it. These features are not available in Data Protector."

"It can occasionally be inaccurate in its backup/recovery time estimates."

"The technical support was very slow."

"The GUI could be updated. The GUI hasn't changed since version 6. It's on version 10 now. The reporting could also be better. Also, while Data Protector is excellent for backing up physical hardware, it needs more features for backing up VM images because many environments use hypervisor."

"Recently, clients have raised concerns about the lack of comprehensive documentation for Data Protector."

"OpenText Data Protector is more difficult to use and configure than OpenText VIM. The user-friendliness of OpenText Data Protector has to be increased, and the complexity of the tool needs to be reduced."

"Many of our users complain about the GUI. You still need to rely on the command line interface. Because it originated as a Unix system, Data Protector is still a command line-driven solution, which makes it seem rather dated compared to systems that are built around a GUI from day one. It doesn't affect the functionality, but some people don't find it user-friendly."

"Microfocus needs to build a partnership with other vendors in addition to HPE as far as cloud consolidation of backups."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's pricing is a good value. They have a straightforward licensing model."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

"The licensing cost is too high."

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"It is more affordable compared to other vendors."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

Comparisons

Rubrik vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 38% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 33% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 30% of the time

More IDERA SQL Safe Backup Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 42% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 12% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 9% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 8% of the time

Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

September 2025

Download IDERA SQL Safe Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

September 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

SQL Safe Backup

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

SQL Safe Backup helps database administrators to back up and recover instantly across SQL Servers. Unlike its competition, it provides virtual databases with access to back up files without consuming disk space, instant restore, centralized management across SQL Servers, and alert notifications for success and failure of operations.

IDERA

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Woman's Hospital; Sisters of Mercy Hospital System; University Medical Center; MetTel; PPG Industries; 3M; Abbott Laboratories; Comcast; Daimler; GameStop; Hormel Foods; Marriott International; Merck; NCR; United Technologies; City of Lynnwood; Linfosys B.V.; TRI-KES; American Customer Care; Merck & Co., Inc.; Service Corporation International; Fresenius Vascular Care Inc.; Bates White; TechPro Inc.; TW Metals, Inc.; Tulane University; ISO Group; Ameriben Solutions; Instron Corporation; Sentric, Inc.; SPIE; GAS Distribution Company of Thessaloniki and Thessaly SA; American Printing House for the Blind; Paysafe; Freeman Decorating Services, Inc.; Sentric, Inc.; Auburn University; Corporate Communications Group; Sagicor Financial Corporation; Crystal Run Healthcare; Principality Building Society; Experiencias Xcaret; Missoula County; Shellpoint Partners LLC; Solix Inc.; Advicent Solutions, Inc.; Phoenix Newspaper Inc.; Park Place Technologies; Kelly & Associates Insurance Group; Boston Medical Center; Service Corporation International; eResearchTechnology, Inc.

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

September 2025

Free Report: IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.