IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

IDERA and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. IDERA is ranked #71, while OpenText is ranked #23 with an average rating of 10.0. IDERA holds a 0.6% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 33% of IDERA users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Read 3 IDERA SQL Safe Backup reviews

1,881 Views
1,524 Comparison Views

33% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

6,164 Views
5,671 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and IDERA SQL Safe Backup are two leading data protection solutions in the market, competing in the realm of data security and management. IDERA SQL Safe Backup is seen as superior in terms of features, making it more valuable for many users.

Features: OpenText Data Protector scores high with its comprehensive disaster recovery, extensive platform support, and scalable architecture. IDERA SQL Safe Backup provides advanced compression, encryption, and efficient data management capabilities, offering superior data protection.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector users seek enhanced performance, better integration with newer technologies, and simplified usability. IDERA SQL Safe Backup users highlight the need for an improved scheduling mechanism, more intuitive error reporting, and a more refined user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector presents a complex deployment process but offers comprehensive customer service. IDERA SQL Safe Backup is easier to deploy and has reliable support, though users report variability in the quality of assistance.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector offers flexible pricing models but comes with higher initial setup costs, resulting in a gradual but steady return on investment. IDERA SQL Safe Backup is valued for its lower setup costs and quicker ROI, with users feeling their investment is justified by faster realization of benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

71st

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (19th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of IDERA SQL Safe Backup is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Data Protector	1.0%
IDERA SQL Safe Backup	0.6%
Other	98.4%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

SeniorDB3550

Senior DBA Lead at a government with 10,001+ employees

It has reduced our backup time, however backups do get skipped

I would like to see the pieces that they have put in the web only to be put into the thick client sitting on the desktop client. They moved a lot of the features to their web-based version of it. Because of the large number of databases that we have along with our backup, their web product can't handle it. So, we can't use it. So, we are missing out on a lot of the new features. The way the filtering goes, if you filter on your view, there is no indication that you have made a selection. Unless you can remember day-to-day that you may have something deselected or selected, your view may be different than you expect, and there is no visual indication of it.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I do like the central management console where you can see a global status for all your backups and manage restores."

"The compression, because it drastically reduces the disk space."

"It has reduced our backup time and simplified our backup processes across all the servers."

"It is far better than the native SQL compressed backup utility, and even though we are seeing approximately 1.4 : 1 de-duplication ratio (using compression at Level 3) we've saved so much space that we still have more than 33% free space on our backup appliances."

"It is a traditional backup model. If you talk about file server and the official Windows database, it's a stable product."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to recover individual files."

"Data Protector allows us to improve our SLA in successful backups and the reporting tools integrated with our management console make possible 99% backup success in our clients."

"It is more user-friendly."

"HP Data Protector integration with RMAN is very stable, robust and provides good diagnostics features to troubleshoot backup issues."

"In one of the projects involving a database and UCMDB integration, we needed to manage a large database. We used the scheduling feature in Data Protector to automate backups."

"Our complete Data Centre HP Data Protector deployment was AU$46,000."

"The most valuable feature of Data Protector is its integration with VMware. A lot of software these days integrates with VMware, and you can run some of these things on virtual machines. You can even have your backup manager running on a virtual machine and use physical managers to move data around. Their VMware integration isn't too bad, but Commvault has that feature, and many other backup products do."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"For a supposedly mature product, it lacks basic functionality that the built-in Microsoft SQL Server backup/restore programs provide and being told we'll be added to interested party list isn't very satisfying."

"The way the filtering goes, if you filter on your view, there is no indication that you have made a selection."

"Make sure you check your backups on a regular basis. Backups do get missed with this tool, for whatever reason."

"I would like to see the pieces that they have put in the web only to be put into the thick client sitting on the desktop client."

"Lots of room for improvement. I have never experienced anything as buggy as SQLsafe."

"In v7, some W2012 clients fail occasionally."

"OpenText Data Protector is more difficult to use and configure than OpenText VIM. The user-friendliness of OpenText Data Protector has to be increased, and the complexity of the tool needs to be reduced."

"Integration with the market applications must be improved, such as MS Exchange, MS Active Directory, SAP and Oracle. Other backup tools are more efficient with the integrated backups."

"What we wanted was disk-to-disk replication. After we got that nailed down, we then wanted to replicate from disk to tape. We were told that we can't do that, and then we were told it doesn't let you do it unless you buy it with a license."

"The interface has been the same for many years and needs to be updated."

"We have a lot of requests for the Micro Focus team, particularly in terms of the Japanese data pattern, as it's not as good now. The Japanese data pattern accuracy of the Micro Focus Data Protector needs to be improved because there are a lot of false negatives and false positives. We are currently testing this and our product team has been communicating with the Micro Focus team."

"There are lots of bugs around; inability to downgrade version, issues with version upgrades, etc."

"Many of our users complain about the GUI. You still need to rely on the command line interface."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's pricing is a good value. They have a straightforward licensing model."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor very cheap."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

"The licensing structure provides cost savings to business."

"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

22%

Construction Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 11% of the time

SCOM vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 10% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 9% of the time

Rubrik vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 8% of the time

Bacula Enterprise vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 6% of the time

More IDERA SQL Safe Backup Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

June 2026

Download IDERA SQL Safe Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

June 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

SQL Safe Backup

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

IDERA SQL Safe Backup offers reliable and comprehensive solutions for database backup, compression, and recovery, ensuring optimal performance and data security for enterprises.

Featuring a robust architecture, IDERA SQL Safe Backup is designed for automated backup management and rapid database restoration. It provides advanced features that simplify backup strategies and improve database performance through efficient storage solutions. Suitable for businesses of all sizes, its capabilities help IT teams maintain data integrity and continuity.

What are the key features of IDERA SQL Safe Backup?

Automated Backups: Streamline backup processes with scheduled jobs reducing manual tasks.
Compression Technology: Enhance storage efficiency with high compression rates lowering disk space usage.
Instant Restore: Immediately access backup data minimizing downtime during recovery processes.
Centralized Management: Manage all aspects of backup environments from a single interface for ease of use.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating IDERA SQL Safe Backup?

Cost Efficiency: Lower operational costs with reduced storage requirements and automated processes.
Time Savings: Save time with simplified management and swift restoration practices.
Data Security: Ensure data safety with secure backup and encryption standards robust enough to meet enterprise needs.
Scalability: Adapt easily to changing needs as databases grow over time without performance loss.

Industries like finance and healthcare benefit significantly from IDERA SQL Safe Backup due to its fast recovery time and robust encryption standards. These features are critical for sectors that handle sensitive data and require compliance with strict regulations. The solution's scalability ensures it can grow with industries experiencing rapid data expansion.

IDERA

OpenText Data Protector offers robust integration with systems like SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange, boasting strong backup and recovery solutions across multiple environments, despite some areas needing improvement such as user-friendliness and GUI design.

OpenText Data Protector provides comprehensive data protection for servers, Linux systems, and applications including Oracle and Microsoft, alongside centralized storage management. It supports virtual, cloud, and on-premises environments, focusing on Oracle database security, HANA, and NAS appliances via NDMP. Despite its benefits, users encounter frequent errors with virtual environment backups, especially with VMware, and find the GUI outdated. Documentation needs improvement for troubleshooting, and support services face criticism for delayed responses. The licensing structure lacks flexibility, and while it supports efficient deduplication and scheduling, reporting capabilities often lead users to rely on external tools.

What are the key features of OpenText Data Protector?

Seamless Integration: Supports SQL, Oracle, VMware, and Exchange for smooth data management.
Centralized Management: Single interface for managing complex environments with ease.
Disaster Recovery: Offers robust recovery capabilities with automated scheduling.
Diverse OS Support: Accommodates numerous operating systems, enhancing flexibility.
Detailed Reporting: Generates reports for informed decision-making and strategy improvements.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reliable Backup: Ensures data integrity and availability across platforms.
Flexibility: Adapts to changing environments and diverse IT landscapes.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines processes to maximize ROI despite licensing costs.
Integration Quality: Works well with existing systems, reducing transition challenges.

OpenText Data Protector finds application in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as finance and healthcare, securing data in compliance-sensitive environments. Industries rely on it for protecting Oracle databases and ensuring data retention and recovery in both short- and long-term scenarios.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Woman's Hospital; Sisters of Mercy Hospital System; University Medical Center; MetTel; PPG Industries; 3M; Abbott Laboratories; Comcast; Daimler; GameStop; Hormel Foods; Marriott International; Merck; NCR; United Technologies; City of Lynnwood; Linfosys B.V.; TRI-KES; American Customer Care; Merck & Co., Inc.; Service Corporation International; Fresenius Vascular Care Inc.; Bates White; TechPro Inc.; TW Metals, Inc.; Tulane University; ISO Group; Ameriben Solutions; Instron Corporation; Sentric, Inc.; SPIE; GAS Distribution Company of Thessaloniki and Thessaly SA; American Printing House for the Blind; Paysafe; Freeman Decorating Services, Inc.; Sentric, Inc.; Auburn University; Corporate Communications Group; Sagicor Financial Corporation; Crystal Run Healthcare; Principality Building Society; Experiencias Xcaret; Missoula County; Shellpoint Partners LLC; Solix Inc.; Advicent Solutions, Inc.; Phoenix Newspaper Inc.; Park Place Technologies; Kelly & Associates Insurance Group; Boston Medical Center; Service Corporation International; eResearchTechnology, Inc.

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

June 2026

Free Report: IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IDERA SQL Safe Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.