IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs Qlik Compose comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
1,644 views|1,367 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Qlik Logo
2,050 views|1,547 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM InfoSphere Information Server and Qlik Compose based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Compose Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The integration with different technologies is the most valuable feature.""IBM InfoSphere Information Server is stable.""Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""This solution is extremely flexible and scalable."

More IBM InfoSphere Information Server Pros →

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive.""One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns.""I have found it to be a very good, stable, and strong product.""It can scale.""There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms.""The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.""I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years.""One of the most valuable features was the ability to integrate multiple source systems that mainly used structured IDBMS versions."

More Qlik Compose Pros →

Cons
"IBM InfoSphere Information Server should be more scalable. It should have the option to change the configuration to run on a single, non-multiple node, or multi-threading processing.""This solution would benefit from the engine being made more lightweight.""Their technical support needs improvement.""There are certain shortcomings in the cloud side of the solution, where improvements are required."

More IBM InfoSphere Information Server Cons →

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates.""There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help.""There could be more customization options.""I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved.""The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring.""I'd like to have access to more developer training materials.""There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process.""My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working."

More Qlik Compose Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing cost of IBM InfoSphere Information Server depends on how many users there are."
  • More IBM InfoSphere Information Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."
  • "The price of the solution is expensive."
  • "While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."
  • More Qlik Compose Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:There are certain shortcomings in the cloud side of the solution, where improvements are required. In our company, we are presently in the process of doing a PoC phase since we have the solution… more »
    Top Answer:I use IBM InfoSphere Information Server in retail banking for transformation purposes.
    Top Answer:There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cubes… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.
    Top Answer:While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us.
    Ranking
    36th
    out of 101 in Data Integration
    Views
    1,644
    Comparisons
    1,367
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    373
    Rating
    7.5
    20th
    out of 101 in Data Integration
    Views
    2,050
    Comparisons
    1,547
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    460
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    InfoSphere Information Server, IBM Information Server
    Compose, Attunity Compose
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server is a market-leading data integration platform which includes a family of products that enable you to understand, cleanse, monitor, transform, and deliver data, as well as to collaborate to bridge the gap between business and IT. InfoSphere Information Server provides massively parallel processing (MPP) capabilities to deliver a highly scalable and flexible integration platform that handles a variety of data volumes (big, small, and everything in between).

    Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility. 

    Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

    Sample Customers
    Canadian National Railway Company, Chickasaw Nation Division of Commerce, Swedish Armed Forces, BG RCI, Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd., University of Arizona, Biogrid Australia
    Poly-Wood
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Government11%
    Insurance Company9%
    Computer Software Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise74%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Compose
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Compose and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM InfoSphere Information Server is ranked 36th in Data Integration with 7 reviews while Qlik Compose is ranked 20th in Data Integration with 12 reviews. IBM InfoSphere Information Server is rated 8.4, while Qlik Compose is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere Information Server writes "Prompt support, reliable, but lacking scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qlik Compose writes "Easy matching and reconciliation of data". IBM InfoSphere Information Server is most compared with IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Qlik Replicate, IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog, IBM Cloud Pak for Data and Oracle GoldenGate, whereas Qlik Compose is most compared with Qlik Replicate, Talend Open Studio, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), SSIS and Azure Data Factory. See our IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Qlik Compose report.

    See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.