IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs Vicarius vRx comparison

IBM and Vicarius are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. IBM is ranked #49 with an average rating of 5.0, while Vicarius is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.9. IBM holds a 0.7% mindshare in VM, compared to Vicarius’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Vicarius users who would recommend it.

IBM Guardium Vulnerability ...

Read 4 IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment reviews

929 Views
901 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Vicarius vRx

Read 21 Vicarius vRx reviews

3,439 Views
2,063 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

IBM Guardium Vulnerability ...

Vicarius vRx

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment and Vicarius vRx are competing in the cybersecurity space, focusing on vulnerability assessment and management. Vicarius vRx has the upper hand due to its advanced automation features and user-friendly setup.

Features: IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment integrates well with IBM's suite, utilizes efficient reporting tools, and provides thorough data protection. Vicarius vRx offers proactive vulnerability management, strong automation, and real-time recommendations, focusing on innovative vulnerability handling.

Room for Improvement: IBM Guardium could enhance its deployment speed and simplify integration processes. Its reporting interface might benefit from an update to improve usability. Additionally, Guardium's resource requirements for setup are higher. Vicarius vRx could improve by expanding its integration options with other security platforms, enhancing detailed reporting features, and providing more advanced training materials for complex use cases.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Guardium features a traditional deployment model, offering comprehensive guidance and reliable customer support. Vicarius vRx offers a simplified deployment with cloud-based options and swift setup, providing a responsive service experience.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Guardium involves a significant upfront investment but presents substantial ROI through its comprehensive data security features. Vicarius vRx is more cost-effective initially, balancing affordability with high returns, appealing to cost-conscious buyers seeking rapid ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Vicarius vRx Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Vicarius vRx

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Guardium Vulnerability ...

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

49th

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Vicarius vRx

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Patch Management (5th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Vicarius vRx is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Vicarius vRx	0.9%
IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment	0.7%
Other	98.4%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Dr. Sajid Latif

Guardium Administrator at Interactive Group

Improvements sought in database optimization while benefiting from robust security monitoring

We use the analytical functionality of Guardium, but the analytical functionality is not so powerful or flexible because it does not include the application user ID. It only includes the database user ID. To identify risky users, it does not support end users, so IBM must incorporate this feature into the built-in analytical engine of the Guardium. There is only one problem I experienced while using Guardium: the internal database of the collector is MySQL, which is not so powerful or flexible. When you make a query in a MySQL database, it takes too much time to respond. IBM should replace this MySQL database with a more powerful internal database for the logging mechanism so that Guardium can collect logging data flexibly and ensure optimization. My overall experience with Guardium is good. The only problem is that IBM must replace the internal DB, MySQL, with a more powerful enterprise-level database because enterprises use it at an enterprise level, and MySQL does not support optimally.

Read full review

reviewer2514510

Works at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees

Has a lot of backend issues and doesn't work the way we thought it would

We did some automation. We kicked off scheduled updates to update our systems, but it did not work. When we attempted to scale the product and update multiple systems, we ran into a lot of issues. We also ran into the issue of it creating double assets. I am not sure how that happened, but it was a mess and still is a mess. That is where we are. They should probably go back to the drawing board and make sure that they can patch Linux. In our environment, we are 99% Linux. They may need to build their own lab and have a lot of Linux devices. They can have old different Linux systems and 50 or 60 of them and attempt to do an update in their own lab and see what happens. I am still not sure if that would give them a true test because we have systems here with Docker containerization and all kinds of things on it. They will have to mimic what some of these environments will look like. I am pretty sure that the tool works great when it comes to Windows, but when you are in an environment that has different flavors of Linux at different version levels, that may pose an issue.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Vulnerability Assessment feature is quite stable and helps identify numerous vulnerabilities in databases."

"It helped with some of the regulatory requirements. It also helped with some of the security analytics and analysis. It was worthwhile from that perspective."

"The reporting features are good and there are many built-in reports that can be quickly configured."

"The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered."

"Vicarius vRx's primary strength is its user-friendly interface."

"Third-party software patching is the most valuable feature."

"I liked the initial dashboard."

"The strongest advantage of Vicarius vRx is its intuitive interface, which requires minimal explanation or support, even for first-time users."

"The ability to consolidate vulnerability discovery, prioritization, and remediation in one platform is crucial."

"Vicarius vRx has reduced 70% of the time we spend on patching."

"I like that vRx is cloud-based. It protects the health of applications against zero-day threats."

"The system prioritizes vulnerabilities, identifying high, medium, and low risks, allowing us to focus on high-risk applications. It allows us to focus on high-risk applications and do the updates."

More Vicarius vRx pros

Cons

"It was not as easy to use. The user-friendliness of it was somewhat lower than what I was expecting. It was also lacking in terms of the ease of the setup. There should be an automatic agent for deployment."

"There is only one problem I experienced while using Guardium: the internal database of the collector is MySQL, which is not so powerful or flexible."

"Building policies is not that easy. There are some things that are turned off by default, for example, displaying values."

"The interface could be improved by having sub-groups of tests, ultimately making the process of collecting tests faster."

"I would like to see a way to build a virtual environment where we can test patches in real-time before we deploy."

"It would be beneficial if Vicarius vRx could implement smart tagging or suggest tags to create a group for these development tools, signifying that they should not be regularly updated."

"Based on the request from our clients, it would be great to have an MDM solution. If they can manage vulnerabilities on mobile devices too, that would be great. Having scripting capabilities on mobile devices would be very useful. That was the request we had from lots of clients."

"Another complaint we've gotten is that the portal doesn't remember your username and password. You tell them your email, and it sends an invitation. You need to click that, and it takes you to a new portal, where you can finally log in. Maybe it's a security precaution, but it seems like a lot of extra steps to log in."

"I would appreciate additional filter options, such as the ability to filter by AWS tags."

"We had an outage due to a change Vicarius performed in their system."

"We are now in the process of trying to get our money back because the tool does not work."

"Areas that need improvement include the CPU usage and the delay between sending updates and receiving feedback on their status."

More Vicarius vRx cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One thing not advantageous for it was that it was a little bit more expensive. I would rate it one out of five in terms of pricing."

"I do not use other solutions, so I cannot compare its pricing to others, but its price seems okay."

"The price of vRx seems fair. None of our clients complained about the pricing. They all thought it was reasonable. Once people understood what it does, it didn't take much to get them to sign up."

"Vicarius vRx offers a competitive price point for the features it provides."

"The pricing was very reasonable and fair compared to other products. I liked that there was no tiered system. One price gave access to everything, which is nice. It is not something you get too often with enterprise IT."

"From a pricing perspective, Vicarius was cheaper compared to other competitors."

"Vicarius vRx is reasonably priced."

"The pricing is fair."

"Vicarius' pricing was reasonable compared to the other systems we evaluated."

More Vicarius vRx pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

38%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

13%

Media Company

Non Profit

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment?

We are still using IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment. We only use IBM Guardium Data Protection and monitoring, data protection and monitoring, classical Guardium. We only use classical Guardium...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment?

We do not use IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment for data encryption or any other tool for analytics, or identity and governance. We do not use any other solution except for protection and monit...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Vicarius vRx?

I do not use other solutions, so I cannot compare its pricing to others, but its price seems okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Vicarius vRx?

I would be happy if the patch update could be downloaded to the Vicarius server and then implemented on the client. Currently, they just send a link to the software. For example, if I want to updat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Vicarius vRx?

We use Vicarius vRx to manage all third-party software updates. Previously, we could manage Windows updates, but third-party updates were an issue. It was difficult for us to manage the updates of ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Qualys VMDR vs IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment

Compared 29% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment

Compared 21% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment

Compared 16% of the time

Tanium vs IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment

Compared 11% of the time

Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Vicarius vRx

Compared 11% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Vicarius vRx

Compared 9% of the time

Action1 vs Vicarius vRx

Compared 6% of the time

ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus vs Vicarius vRx

Compared 6% of the time

NinjaOne vs Vicarius vRx

Compared 6% of the time

More Vicarius vRx Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Vulnerability Management

January 2026

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment report

Download IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment product report

Buyer's Guide

Vicarius vRx

January 2026

Download Vicarius vRx product report

Overview

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment scans data infrastructures (databases, data warehouses and big data environments) to detect vulnerabilities, and suggests remedial actions. The solution identifies exposures such as missing patches, weak passwords, unauthorized changes and misconfigured privileges.

IBM

Vicarius vRx automates patching and vulnerability mitigation with patchless protection, appreciated for effective third-party app patching and vulnerability prioritization. The platform offers streamlined management via intuitive dashboards, consolidating vulnerability discovery and remediation.

Vicarius vRx streamlines the patching and vulnerability mitigation process, delivering automation through patchless protection. It is favored for its ability to handle third-party applications effectively while providing vulnerability prioritization. The platform's intuitive dashboards allow for efficient management, consolidating vulnerability discovery and remediation efforts. Users note the robust scripting engine and supportive community as significant assets in mitigating critical threats, reducing manual effort and remediation time. Despite the strengths, enhancements in areas like automating patchless solutions, simplifying the login process, and refining networking vulnerability scanning capabilities are needed. The patch update process, reporting, and scripting functionalities require improvements. Name changes have resulted in some confusion, and additional filtering options are desired, along with better cloud integration and system feedback on update statuses. Logging options and mobile device management support are sought after by organizations.

What are the key features of Vicarius vRx?

Patchless Protection: Automates vulnerability mitigation without patches.
Third-Party App Patching: Effectively manages updates for non-native applications.
Vulnerability Prioritization: Identifies and prioritizes critical threats efficiently.
Intuitive Dashboards: Simplifies management and oversight of vulnerabilities.
Robust Scripting Engine: Provides tools for custom threat mitigation strategies.

What benefits can users expect from using Vicarius vRx?

Efficiency Gains: Streamlines vulnerability discovery and remediation processes.
Reduced Remediation Time: Minimizes manual effort with automation.
Improved Threat Response: Quick application of critical patches across numerous assets.
Enhanced Reporting: Delivers detailed insights and compliance support.
Audit Compliance: Meets requirements for PCI, HIPAA, and regulatory frameworks.

Managed service providers utilize Vicarius vRx for compliance needs, focusing on PCI and HIPAA requirements, vulnerability management, and patching. They use it extensively for patch management, covering both Microsoft and third-party updates, and for centralized update management. It aids in achieving visibility and automation, ensuring quick application of necessary patches across numerous assets while enhancing cybersecurity effectiveness with its network functionality and audit compliance features.

Vicarius

Buyer's Guide

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Vicarius vRx

February 2026

Free Report: IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Vicarius vRx

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Vicarius vRx and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs. Vicarius vRx report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.