

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Cost savings come from re-engineering the business processes using IBM FileNet and related strategies.
There is a significant ROI from IBM FileNet because before its introduction, the company needed to do all the work manually.
There has been a return on investment from using Sharepoint 2016 Standard, as documentation approval workflows, change request processes, HR onboarding and offboarding flows, document routing based on metadata, and notifications and escalations have all improved with Sharepoint being implemented.
You can stop paying for other tools if you are willing to move to Sharepoint 2016 Standard.
Time saved productivity metrics means tasks that used to take a week now get resolved in one to two days with Sharepoint 2016 Standard, saving approximately five to seven days per request.
People come from all over the world, and they have specialists at the other end of the world to help if needed.
IBM has a different division that provides consultation to end users, and most customers utilize consultation from IBM, which costs approximately $100k USD to $200k USD.
The consulting experts that IBM provides sometimes do not understand the tool very well.
The customer support for Sharepoint 2016 Standard is very active and responsive.
The response was quite swift, the engineers were quite knowledgeable, and they were able to resolve my issue in the shortest possible time.
When I contacted the support team, they helped me recover the file in a very efficient and supportive way.
The bigger products like IBM FileNet can handle billions of documents and thousands of users.
With Kubernetes, we can simply add instances of the worker, CPU, or memory without needing deployment.
We have about 80 transactional systems connected to IBM FileNet.
Zero downtime patching means adding servers or patching can be done without weekend outages.
The security and reliability enhancements make it very scalable.
Sharepoint 2016 Standard is highly scalable.
I have never encountered a problem of data corruption, losing data files, insecure access, or anything of that nature.
FileNet was restricted to DB2's enterprise edition instead of the standard edition, causing complications.
In terms of stability, we haven't experienced any big technical issues or downtime with IBM FileNet.
I have not seen any crashes or downtimes so far.
I have not found any bugs myself, so for me, Sharepoint 2016 Standard is pretty stable.
I use it on a daily basis for most of my tasks, and I have not faced any stability issues.
Ease of use with IBM FileNet is a disadvantage of this tool. It is complex and hard to use.
The response time and resolution of issues by technical support need improvement.
From the beginning, we cannot use a REST API; we have to use the IBM FileNet native API, which is quite outdated.
Implementing minimum roles plus zero downtime patching, which is built into the 2016 setup, means we should configure minimum roles correctly so web front end, application server, and search servers can do only their job and speed up farms.
I would assess the integration of Microsoft Office apps within Sharepoint 2016 Standard for document management as lacking.
Whatever use case I have been involved in or whatever additional things that I needed, I have always been able to find those on Sharepoint 2016 Standard.
We are living in a world where the minimal license from IBM costs anywhere from seventy-five thousand to one hundred thousand US dollars.
The product has become more expensive and requires significant investment for enterprise solutions.
The price is high, with yearly subscriptions increasing day by day.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Sharepoint 2016 Standard has been that it offers very competitive price plans, which are good for business.
Only choose 2016 if you have a clear upgrade hybrid plan before 2026 and do not start any new 2016 projects unless they are planned for fewer than two years of use with air-gapped security.
There is a significant ROI from IBM FileNet because before its introduction, the company needed to do all the work manually.
The main features we find impactful are the workflow and document management along with FileNet file stores.
At this level, companies don't buy a ready-made solution.
Sharepoint 2016 Standard has positively impacted my organization by providing a very good data repository and organization of various amounts of information that is stored in these Sharepoint sites.
Sharepoint 2016 Standard has role-based access control, which secures our enterprise data effectively.
It integrates well with other Microsoft products through Office 365.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| IBM FileNet | 5.8% |
| Sharepoint 2016 Standard | 0.3% |
| Other | 93.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 74 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
IBM FileNet is designed for advanced content management, delivering scalability, integration, and security for document storage and workflow processes, beneficial for multiple industries seeking efficiency and digital transformation.
IBM FileNet stands out with its robust capabilities for content management by automating workflow processes and providing comprehensive metadata functionalities. It offers flexible storage solutions and powerful search capabilities, supported by API extensibility. Security is enhanced through encryption and role-based access, ensuring data protection. Seamless integration with IBM tools supports enterprise governance and compliance, while its intuitive interface and fast document retrieval drive user satisfaction and productivity. However, cloud integration, AI and analytics, and tool compatibility require enhancement, along with a need for an improved setup process and user interface modernization. There is a demand for better pricing models and simplified version migrations.
What are IBM FileNet's key features?IBM FileNet is extensively used across sectors like government, finance, and healthcare to enhance document management and automate tasks. It supports digital transformation by acting as a centralized repository, enabling secure access and integration with other business applications. Organizations use it to store large volumes of documents and improve handling efficiency.
SharePoint 2016 Standard offers a versatile platform for seamless collaboration and document management. With its role-based access, secure file sharing, and AI adaptability, it helps organizations enhance productivity and support robust business processes, despite its integration challenges.
SharePoint 2016 Standard is designed to integrate with Microsoft tools, providing an intuitive interface and granular permission management. It simplifies collaboration by reducing manual tasks, enhancing security with role-based access, and supporting AI integration for improved efficiency. Users can manage documents efficiently with version control and high-capacity data storage. Despite its strengths, SharePoint faces challenges like limited integration with Microsoft Office apps, SAP connectivity issues, and navigation difficulties, impacting productivity. Suggested improvements include enhancing file movement, loading times, third-party integrations, and modernizing its design.
What are the key features of SharePoint 2016 Standard?Industries use SharePoint 2016 Standard for intensive document management, team collaboration, and centralizing communication. Organizations benefit from its real-time collaboration features, serving as a knowledge repository accessible from anywhere, ensuring secure remote work and effective communication.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.