IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Microsoft Azure DevOps Server comparison

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps Server

Download the complete report

Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...

Ranking in Software Configuration Management

4th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (9th)

Microsoft Azure DevOps Server

Ranking in Software Configuration Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Software Configuration Management category, the mindshare of IBM Engineering Workflow Management is 8.2%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure DevOps Server is 6.3%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Configuration Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure DevOps Server	6.3%
IBM Engineering Workflow Management	8.2%
Other	85.5%

Software Configuration Management

Featured Reviews

Manoj Sajjan

Technical Lead at Microgenesis Techsoft Private limited

Manages complex workflows effectively and offers valuable features

My name is Sofia from PeerSpot regarding my experience with IBM Engineering Workflow Management. It is a leading review site. The solution is very easy to trace. My company name is MicroGenesis TechSoft Private Limited, and my title is Technical Lead. I am interested in being a reference for this vendor. PeerSpot will create an account and email login credentials. The review will be published in written and/or audio format on peerspot.com and made available to other users. PeerSpot will email a link to the written review for editing at any time. The review may be available to third parties on third-party websites. For anonymous reviews, names will not appear. Email notifications relevant to the review are optional and can be opted out at any time. The use of reviews is subject to PeerSpot's terms of use at peerspot.com/tos. On a scale of 1-10, I rate IBM Engineering Workflow Management a 10.

Read full review

SachinJain

Senior Technical Specialist at Intuitive Technology Partners

Have faced challenges in getting timely responses but have managed to streamline workflows and reduce infrastructure costs

My current company was not using any products apart from AMQ. I suggested it to them, which is why they started using it. I also suggested it to the customer. The feedback for Red Hat AMQ has been good. Based on this, we suggest it to our customers, and they are happy using that product. Our big customer, FedEx, which is one of the best and biggest giants in logistics and courier, started using it and they are happy with that. The base operating system, RHEL 8 and 9, is being used across the infrastructure. The server and critical applications and data are running on Red Hat 8 and 9. We are performing proper maintenance of the OS and it is working fantastically. We have not received any issues or complaints. Our domains include Human Gateway, pharmaceuticals, and automobile clients. The critical application is running on Microsoft Azure DevOps Server. When developers send code to us, we create the CI/CD pipeline and schedule jobs. The solution provides time savings and infrastructure savings. Multiple virtual machines are not required when installing applications in containerization, which saves infrastructure costs. We receive notifications about CPU, memory, and disk space utilization from time to time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It’s not cheap, but it is worth the price."

"The pricing is supposed to be competitive."

"RTC allows us to customize different processes to fit the best projects requirements."

"Rational Team Concert is the part of CLM solution and can be easily integrated with the requirement module, Rational DOORS, and the quality module, Rational Quality Manager, which allows organizations to automate the whole SDLC under the same umbrella with seamless integration."

"Agile templates give us a standard methodology for every Agile project. Also, the ability to create our own object types and linkages to features/epics allows us to enhance the verification of feature readiness."

"Backlog management is a valuable feature."

"Overall, Workflow allows us to manage our stories, sprints, hydration and releases."

"Easy collaboration between several development teams such as design, development, and testing, and it's also simple to get an overview of a project's status."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management pros

"The product helps with version control. I can build, develop, test and deploy applications from a single platform."

"The solution has a good framework that is user friendly and scalable."

"The solution’s fast performance is its most valuable feature."

"I work with Microsoft and understand what they are trying to do; it really helps."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Every month there is an increase in the number of users. It is a scalable solution."

"In summary, this is a good product that is straightforward, easy to use, and manages well."

"Microsoft makes great products. They are quite robust."

"Azure Board is helpful because it is easy to use and the board clearly shows the status of our project."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Server pros

Cons

"Customer service is good but not excellent."

"Upgrades, even minor versions, seem too labour intensive, especially with the enhanced objects, which is why the Jazz platform should be so good."

"Some administrative tasks are difficult to perform. These could be simplified."

"The solution is very heavily vendor dependent."

"It has improved our organization up to an extent, but it certainly has a lot of areas for improvement related to resource management."

"I would rate the IBM Engineering Workflow Management a seven or an eight. I am leaning closer to seven based on a couple of items I mentioned that I would like to see or know more about, such as improved reporting."

"Teams need clearer pictures of resource availability in charts and dashboards along with plans."

"Look for guidelines and YouTube videos before starting to use RTC (too complex for new users)."

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management cons

"When you go into the front-end, the web portal, if, for example, you pick up an issue, it would be ideal if the branch was automatically created in the repository. Right now, this isn't the case."

"The stability of the product could be better."

"The technical support could be better."

"I have seen customizations with Team System that allowed it to integrate into other ticketing systems like Jira, which would be a really nice feature to see."

"I cannot comment on how I rate Microsoft Azure DevOps Server solution; I'm working in a small part of it and don't have enough experience."

"The product must improve its stability."

"The product should be priced better."

"I would say compared to some more modern tools which are made to work offline, with this solution you have to be connected all of the time and with a central server."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools."

"It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements."

"It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. The cost per token is around $115-$120."

"Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition."

"It is an open-source product from Microsoft."

"There is no fee for the solution's community version."

"You can choose pricing from a variety of options. I would rate the product's pricing a six out of ten."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"The price could be better."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

17%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Marketing Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Insurance Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?

I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.

What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?

IBM Engineering Workflow Management can be improved by enhancing its pricing structure, specifically the cost and licensing of this solution.

What is your primary use case for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?

The typical use case for IBM Engineering Workflow Management is to streamline project management and ensure efficient workflow.

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Team System?

Currently, I don't see any areas for improvement or anything that could be better about Microsoft Azure DevOps Server. Perhaps some small things could be changed or some features could be added, bu...

What is your primary use case for Visual Studio Team System?

I am using Microsoft Azure DevOps Server for our developmental process. I simply use it for task creation and all, focused on daily activities. I have integrated Microsoft Azure DevOps Server with ...

What advice do you have for others considering Visual Studio Team System?

From the developers on my team, I don't hear any positive feedback about these available integrations or concerns. Everything is all right. I would give eight to nine points in general to Microsoft...

Jira vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Comparisons

Compared 15% of the time

Endevor vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Compared 8% of the time

Rocket ChangeMan ZMF (formerly a Micro Focus product) vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Compared 6% of the time

BMC AMI DevX vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Compared 6% of the time

Rally Software vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Competitors

IBM Rational ClearQuest vs Microsoft Azure DevOps Server

Compared 30% of the time

Helix Core vs Microsoft Azure DevOps Server

Compared 24% of the time

OpenText Dimensions CM vs Microsoft Azure DevOps Server

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Microsoft Azure DevOps Server

Compared 10% of the time

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Server Competitors

Product Reports

IBM Engineering Workflow Management

Download IBM Engineering Workflow Management product report

IBM Engineering Workflow Management report

Microsoft Azure DevOps Server

Download Microsoft Azure DevOps Server product report

Also Known As

IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC

No data available

Overview

IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

IBM

Microsoft Azure DevOps Server is a comprehensive platform for managing software development processes, offering tools for code management, lifecycle development, and project tracking, supporting remote repositories and continuous integration.

Azure DevOps Server is known for its scalability, robust framework, and efficient version control. It enhances usability through features like campaign boards, sprint planning, and project status tracking graphics. Users appreciate its source control and powerful IDE that supports building and deploying applications. However, there are challenges with offline functionality, integration with other systems, and stability on non-Windows platforms. Moreover, it supports various sectors by streamlining the software development processes, especially for teams working on digital transformation and business process automation.

What are the key features of Microsoft Azure DevOps Server?

Campaign Boards: Facilitates project status tracking with user-friendly graphics
Sprint Planning: Enhances project management efficiency
Source Control: Provides robust version control for code management
Continuous Integration: Streamlines code deployment and testing processes
IntelliSense: Offers intelligent code completion to boost productivity
Lifecycle Development: Manages the complete software development process

What benefits should users look for in Azure DevOps Server reviews?

Scalability: Ensures the platform grows with team demands
Robustness: Delivers a stable and flexible environment for software development
Performance: Offers fast and efficient tools for managing projects
User Friendliness: User-friendly design aids in quick adoption and ease of use

Azure DevOps Server finds use in industries such as industrial sectors, government digital transformation, and business process automation. Teams employ it for software development, leveraging integration with systems and automation tools daily. Its support for remote repository management and ALM management makes it a vital resource for project efficiency.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT

Bluegarden A/S, Tracasa, Rabobank Group, Borusan Otomotiv, Arelik, Alfa Bank

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps Server