IBM DevOps Test UI vs Testim comparison

Read 10 Testim reviews

1,629 Views
1,150 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM DevOps Test UI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

IBM DevOps Test UI and Testim compete in test automation tools, each excelling in unique areas. IBM DevOps Test UI excels in enterprise integration, while Testim stands out for speed and efficiency due to its innovative features.

Features: IBM DevOps Test UI has strong integration capabilities with IBM infrastructure, robust object identification, and supports Java and .NET scripting. Testim features AI-driven testing, easy record-and-playback capabilities, and custom JS test options for complex scenarios.

Room for Improvement: IBM DevOps Test UI could enhance deployment speed, simplify its user interface, and improve cloud compatibility. Testim could benefit from broader enterprise-level integration, improved API connectivity, and better support for complex scripting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Testim offers cloud-based rapid deployment and immediate responsiveness in customer support. IBM DevOps Test UI requires detailed setup but provides extensive enterprise-focused support for large deployments.

Pricing and ROI: Testim has a lower initial cost suitable for smaller teams aiming for quick implementation. IBM DevOps Test UI has higher upfront costs, justified by its long-term ROI for enterprises utilizing IBM’s ecosystem, supporting sustained scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Testim Report (Updated: April 2025).

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Testim

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM DevOps Test UI

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

29th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (14th)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM DevOps Test UI is 0.7%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 3.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Hellen Zhang

Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada

Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support

The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to how it works with the browser and the startup takes some time. Adjusting those changes to speed up the load time will improve the solution.

Read full review

PiyushSingh

Director at Xceedance

A stable tool to help users take care of the implementation phases in their environment

There are a few minor areas where improvements are required, but they are not something that I can discuss at a high level. I will have to ask the team that uses Testim since they can give a better response to what requires improvement in the product. I only manage the team that uses Testim. I cannot be exactly described as an end user of the tool. There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it. There were some trial and error methods our company had to deal with while using the product's documentation, after which we were able to get through the setup phase. I want the documentation to have more information to help users with the setup process. I want the product to be more scalable in the future.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."

"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."

"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."

"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"The product is easy to use."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."

More Testim pros

Cons

"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."

"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."

"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."

"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The solution is not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

28%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

See all answers

Comparisons

Selenium HQ vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 38% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 25% of the time

HCL OneTest vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 17% of the time

More IBM DevOps Test UI Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 49% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 21% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 13% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 4% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

Functional Testing Tools

Download IBM DevOps Test UI product report

Download Testim product report

Also Known As

IBM Rational Functional Tester

No data available

Overview

IBM DevOps Test UI, also known as Rational Functional Tester, is a software tool designed for automated functional and regression testing of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) and data-driven testing. It automates the testing process to ensure application functionalities work as intended and identifies any issues caused by new code changes. The tool is tailored for GUI testing, allowing for easy recording and playback of test cases that interact with UI elements like buttons and menus. It supports data-driven testing, enabling comprehensive tests across various data sets. Additionally, it offers visual editing features with screenshot representations for easy test creation and ScriptAssure technology to maintain test scripts even if the UI changes.

IBM

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Sample Customers

Edumate

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. Testim