IBM Cloud Pak for Automation vs vCenter Orchestrator comparison

IBM and Broadcom are both solutions in the Process Automation category. IBM is ranked #21 with an average rating of 9.0, while Broadcom is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 0.5% mindshare in PA, compared to Broadcom’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

IBM Cloud Pak for Automation

Read 2 IBM Cloud Pak for Automation reviews

269 Views
266 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

vCenter Orchestrator

Read 51 vCenter Orchestrator reviews

848 Views
170 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Pak for Automation

vCenter Orchestrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

vCenter Orchestrator and IBM Cloud Pak for Automation are products in the automation market, offering distinctive advantages. IBM Cloud Pak for Automation has the upper hand with superior features that make it worth the investment despite vCenter Orchestrator's competitive pricing and support.

Features: vCenter Orchestrator offers seamless automation workflows, centralized management, and strong integration with VMware environments. On the other hand, IBM Cloud Pak for Automation provides robust AI-driven automation, extensive support for end-to-end process automation, and a comprehensive set of features for broader applicability across diverse cloud environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Cloud Pak for Automation provides flexible deployment options in hybrid and multi-cloud environments, along with extensive support resources. vCenter Orchestrator offers streamlined deployment within VMware ecosystems, but additional support might be necessary for complex implementations. IBM Cloud Pak's broader deployment model and dedicated customer service resources offer greater adaptability for various environments.

Pricing and ROI: vCenter Orchestrator is considered cost-effective with straightforward pricing and quick time-to-value within VMware settings. IBM Cloud Pak for Automation requires a higher upfront investment, justified by its expansive feature set and long-term ROI, offering solutions adaptable to changing business needs. The choice is between initial cost and future investment value, with IBM Cloud Pak providing greater potential ROI over time.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Pak for Automation vs. vCenter Orchestrator Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Pak for Automation vs. vCenter Orchestrator

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Pak for Automation

Ranking in Process Automation

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

vCenter Orchestrator

Ranking in Process Automation

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Automation is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of vCenter Orchestrator is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
vCenter Orchestrator	0.3%
IBM Cloud Pak for Automation	0.5%
Other	99.2%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

SYEDMUJTABA

Vice President - Digital Automation Services at Techvista Systems

Effectively handles parallel instances effectively

I find it quite straightforward, perhaps around 8.5 out of 10 in terms of ease. When we upgraded from the old version of IBM BPM to the new one within IBM Cloud Pak for Automation, we didn't encounter any major issues. There were some minor ones, but they were easy to overcome.The migration process was part of our deployment strategy. We had a plan to migrate two processes per week from on-premises to the cloud. The migration involved taking the instances and migrating them to the new environment. There is an inbuilt feature in IBM Cloud Pak for Automation that facilitates the migration process, although I personally haven't conducted it myself; it's managed by my team. Overall, the setup process was relatively smooth.

Read full review

Gerhard Gmelch

IT architect endpoint at Rohde & Schwarz

Enhance automation efficiency with cost-effective graphical workflow design

I use vCenter Orchestrator for automation purposes, specifically to run automation workbooks The most valuable features are the graphical UI for designing the workflows and the interfaces that come out of the box. Additionally, it is included in the VMware Vitalization Stack, which means there…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What this product allows us to do is to move from on-prem instances where we are running independent instances of FileNet, Datacap, and ODM. It allows us to leverage container-based resiliency and availability modeling so that we have some visibility across the CP4BA ecosystem. We're now migrating all of our data to be in the Cloud Object Storage, and we can now use some of the features of Azure in terms of how we store and retrieve content for our members and our providers."

"I believe two significant features of IBM Cloud Pak for Automation are the focus on SLA management and the capability to handle parallel instances effectively. Parallel instances, for instance, are valuable when dealing with a large number of users, enabling tasks to be performed concurrently for efficient system operation. The SLA aspect is crucial for tracking and ensuring timely completion of tasks. Additionally, the cloud compatibility of IBM BAW allows for seamless migration from on-premises to the cloud. This version also includes a business rule management system for storing and managing business rules effectively."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"It is very stable. I have been using vCenter Orchestrator from version three now to six plus."

"The open, flexible architecture has brought in the agile computing environment along with better Dr capabilities. Automation management and operational tasks across VMware and third-party applications, like our HMIS and other business productivity applications, have delivered peace of mind."

"Because of the central management, the scripting engine and workflow engine are integrated with VMware without any burden to integrate different products."

"The most valuable feature is workflow automation."

"The most valuable feature is how easy it makes it to manage the VM."

"It is the most cost-effective method for moving data between machines."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is availability."

More vCenter Orchestrator pros

Cons

"I believe there is room for improvement in the user interface, particularly in the Process Portal that customers use to view and manage their tasks. The UI of the Process Portal needs enhancement. Additionally, in the next release, I would like to see improved compatibility with Angular, allowing for direct integration with front-end systems. It would be beneficial to have built-in GUI features based on Angular within the system, rather than developing separate applications externally. This, in turn, would provide a more seamless and enhanced front-end experience."

"One of the challenges we're having is finding vendors who have experience in developing on the cloud. We can find developers on the old platform, but it is leading-edge technology. So, we are having some challenges, and IBM is assisting us to find vendor partners. To be able to leverage all the capabilities of the new platform, we have to upgrade our existing ecosystem of FileNet applications. Upgrading to the new platform while trying to modernize is always challenging because it is like you have a moving target."

"The only point for improvement is the price, which has increased by 135%, making it very expensive."

"There are some update-related issues with the product."

"I did not do the initial setup. However, it was complex at the beginning."

"There are no good manuals or guidelines on integrations. Hence, you need to be asking someone."

"I believe a transparent view and better terms of condition between Oracle and vCenter Orchestrator would be helpful."

"It is too expensive. One of the main issues is the price."

"Enhancing the platform's setup process intuitiveness and offering more flexible pricing options could further improve its accessibility across different company sizes."

"The solution’s pricing and integration could be improved."

More vCenter Orchestrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM Cloud Pak for Automation is relatively expensive, especially considering it is designed for long-living processes, not for normal automation needs. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the pricing at around 9. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees, but IBM has multiple pricing models that make it expensive in its own way. Different plans are available, but overall, the experience suggests it is a costly solution."

"Its cost is almost the same or comparable to what we pay with FileNet, but I'm not sure what we pay a year. A good part of CP4BA is the CPU-based licensing model. When we're dealing with 50,000 dentists, for example, if we were to use Salesforce, we would be hit with the licensing of 50,000 dentists, whereas when we build out in CP4BA, it is just based on our CPU usage, not on individual licenses."

"The price is reasonable, and one of the reasons that this product was selected."

"Our licensing is on a yearly basis. We pay for the license and then we pay the support every year."

"The licensing cost is manageable because they have different versions available, standard, essential, and advanced."

"The solution is a bit expensive."

"This solution is expensive and the licensing is more attractive for Haveri."

"The licensing module is somewhat complex. Calculating the cost is complicated. Many of our clients are unclear about the billing system and the traffic metering."

"The concept of hyper-convergence is smart. I don't know if it can be applied with less cost to be more affordable for small or medium-sized companies. The cost is a very important factor for it. We are currently depending on SAN storage. However, the hyper-converged solutions are depending on the storage within the hosts, such as vSAN in the VMware. It is a smart solution."

"We renew the solution's license every one or two years."

More vCenter Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

19%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Automation?

I believe two significant features of IBM Cloud Pak for Automation are the focus on SLA management and the capability to handle parallel instances effectively. Parallel instances, for instance, ar...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Cloud Pak for Automation?

IBM Cloud Pak for Automation is relatively expensive, especially considering it is designed for long-living processes, not for normal automation needs. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the pr...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Automation?

I believe there is room for improvement in the user interface, particularly in the Process Portal that customers use to view and manage their tasks. The UI of the Process Portal needs enhancement. ...

See all answers

What do you like most about vCenter Orchestrator?

The stability of the product is very good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for vCenter Orchestrator?

We're running a low-profile budget. This is not our main focus on investment technology, so we're trying to reduce costs due to the change from perpetual to subscription licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with vCenter Orchestrator?

For our environment, I do not see any areas of vCenter Orchestrator that could be improved or enhanced. We are currently satisfied with the orchestrator. If any improvements are needed, I will prov...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs IBM Cloud Pak for Automation

Compared 52% of the time

Appian vs IBM Cloud Pak for Automation

Compared 48% of the time

More IBM Cloud Pak for Automation Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 38% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 27% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs vCenter Orchestrator

Compared 12% of the time

More vCenter Orchestrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

October 2025

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

vCenter Orchestrator

September 2025

Download vCenter Orchestrator product report

Overview

IBM Cloud Pak for Automation offers design, build, run, and automation services to rapidly scale your programs and fully execute and operationalize an automation strategy.

IBM

VMware vCenter Orchestrator simplifies the automation of complex IT tasks and integrates with VMware vCloud Suite components to adapt and extend service delivery and operational management, effectively working with existing infrastructure, tools and processes.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Beiersdorf Shared Services

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Pak for Automation vs. vCenter Orchestrator

September 2025

Free Report: IBM Cloud Pak for Automation vs. vCenter Orchestrator

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Pak for Automation vs. vCenter Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Cloud Pak for Automation vs. vCenter Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.