We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Container Registry and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry."The product is efficient and can be used for multiple environments."
"It is a stable solution...Since it is a cloud solution, I can say it is a scalable product."
"The solution is pretty straightforward to setup and use."
"It is a stable solution since it offers a very powerful performance to its users."
"The feature I think should be improved is the option to rename the machines."
"I have found Oracle Cloud to be a scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a cloud-based solution."
"There is ROI with the product's use."
"The scalability feature of the product is very impressive, especially considering the fact that the tool offers its users a pay-as-you-go model."
"IBM Cloud Container Registry should improve its API management. One improvement factor could be enhancing the integration capabilities of container registries like Harbor with hyperscaler platforms. While some container registries, like Azure Container Registry and IBM Cloud Container Registry, are tightly integrated with their respective hyperscaler environments, others may lack integration options."
"The AI capabilities and the power automate platform that Azure is offering seem to be way ahead of what Oracle is offering."
"The product's resilience is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Oracle Cloud is not a user-friendly tool. From an improvement perspective, I want Oracle Cloud to be more user-friendly."
"Oracle Cloud Platform can improve the integration with hybrid and cross-cloud deployments. It should be a flexible solution with a very well-defined integration with other applications in the hybrid environment. There are certain integrations that are not straightforward."
"One improvement that would be helpful is the addition of a replication option on their Standard Edition OD service. Currently, this option is not available, which leads many customers to move to the Enterprise edition. However, other cloud service providers, such as Amazon AWS offer replication options at a similar tier. It would be beneficial if Oracle also explored providing this option for their Standard Edition service."
"OCI's user interface is awful and needs to be modernized."
"It isn't easy to get qualified people who know how to work on this tool. All my administrators are learning as they go. Since this is the only cloud solution provider in Saudi Arabia, and it has only been around for one year, I am sure that this will change with time."
"More technical papers could be published to help out professionals."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Cloud Container Registry is ranked 7th in Container Registry with 1 review while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 5th in Container Registry with 91 reviews. IBM Cloud Container Registry is rated 9.0, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Container Registry writes "A free solution that is beneficial for customers who cannot afford to create new containers on-premises". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". IBM Cloud Container Registry is most compared with Amazon ECR, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud and OpenShift.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
