Hyland OnBase vs ProcessMaker comparison

Hyland and ProcessMaker are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Hyland is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.6, while ProcessMaker is ranked #35. Hyland holds a 1.4% mindshare in BPM, compared to ProcessMaker’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ProcessMaker users who would recommend it.

Hyland OnBase

Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews

4,371 Views
1,005 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ProcessMaker

Read 2 ProcessMaker reviews

720 Views
684 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

ProcessMaker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and ProcessMaker are competitive products in enterprise content management and business process management sectors. Users seem to favor ProcessMaker for its process automation capabilities.

Features: Hyland OnBase is recognized for its document management, capturing, and workflow automation covering multiple industries. ProcessMaker focuses on process design and business process automation, and is better for optimizing workflows. Users appreciate ProcessMaker's flexibility for different business processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase can be complicated to set up due to its extensive features, but users value the strong customer support. ProcessMaker is easy to deploy, ideal for those needing quick implementation and strong support.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase involves higher setup costs due to its comprehensive features, affecting ROI timeframes. ProcessMaker is cost-effective with a quick ROI, beneficial for budget-conscious businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. ProcessMaker Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. ProcessMaker

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (6th), Low-Code Development Platforms (12th)

ProcessMaker

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

35th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 1.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ProcessMaker is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Hyland OnBase	1.4%
ProcessMaker	0.9%
Other	97.7%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Seamless data management enhances security while monolithic architecture and reporting need improvements

I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, addressing some concerns. Additionally, there could be more integration points with products Hyland has acquired, such as Alfresco and Nuxeo. Offering a trial version with basic features would allow users to experience the product before purchasing. I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.

Read full review

UchechiSylvanus

Team Lead, Process Improvement & RPA at Fidelity Bank Plc

Works well, but its interface should be a bit more user-friendly

We use it for our process flows and levels of approvals, but I am not managing it directly Its performance, stability, and security are fine. Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly. I have been using this solution for close to a year. It is stable. It is easy to scale. We currently…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."

"Its most valuable aspect is its flexibility"

"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."

"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"The solution's most valuable features are integration and flexibility."

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

"Integrating Hyland OnBase with our systems enabled us to automate document designs and templates, which was extremely helpful in the finance and banking industry."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."

"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."

Cons

"We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application."

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

"The migration is a bit difficult in the tool."

"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."

"I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."

"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"The tool's price is high."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"We have a yearly license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

I was a vendor managing Hyland OnBase ( /products/hyland-onbase-reviews ) for Hyland, not as a direct user but as a business partner. We managed the solution and were a partner with Hyland.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 10% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 8% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Camunda vs ProcessMaker

Compared 37% of the time

Bonita vs ProcessMaker

Compared 15% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs ProcessMaker

Compared 14% of the time

Appian vs ProcessMaker

Compared 11% of the time

Bizagi vs ProcessMaker

Compared 9% of the time

More ProcessMaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

January 2026

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

January 2026

Download ProcessMaker product report

Also Known As

OnBase

ProcessMaker Workflow Management & BPM, ProcessMaker BPM

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

ProcessMaker is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina. The company specializes primarily in developing and marketing enterprise business process management (BPM) software. The company also provides customer support, training, and professional services to larger enterprise customers that require highly customized solutions. The company’s flagship Low-Code BPM product is known for its ease of use and ability for deep customization.

ProcessMaker

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Tulsa Community College, Sirius College, Mcredit Vietnam, Oregon City Schools, Lakozy Toyota, HyperCube

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. ProcessMaker

December 2025

Free Report: Hyland OnBase vs. ProcessMaker

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. ProcessMaker and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hyland OnBase vs. ProcessMaker report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.