We performed a comparison between Huawei OceanStor and Pavilion HyperParallel Flash Array based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two All-Flash Storage Arrays solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is easy to use, deploy, communicate and manage this solution."
"The most valuable feature of Huawei OceanStor is the hybrid applications."
"The support is excellent."
"Huawei OceanStor is stable."
"The setup and the price are the most valuable and not the features related."
"OceanStor is cheaper than Dell EMC, and its management interface is quite simple."
"The pricing is very reasonable."
"This is a stable storage system."
"There's lots of flexibility in how we use the resources while also maintaining a small footprint."
"The high performance is very valuable, as well as the enterprise reliability features."
"We have been able to consolidate storage into Pavilion. Pavilions are our only SANs because it is a bring your own disk solution. When new drives come out, we are able to take out half of the drives in the system, put in new drives, move our VMs over to the new drives, take the other drives out, and populate those with new drives. Then, we are suddenly twice as dense as we were before. NVMe flash is only going to get denser and cheaper so we can make use of that every couple of years by just throwing newer disks into it at a fraction of the cost of a new SAN."
"Technical support could be more helpful."
"In the future release, Huawei OceanStor should improve on what they already have. It is a good solution."
"I would like to see the next generation all-flash, which could be combined."
"The security could be a bit more robust."
"We did experience a little latency with this solution."
"CFS integration is one area where OceanStor has some room for improvement. The CFS on OceanStor is dedicated, so it's not integrated with the existing active directory domain."
"The solution could improve by having better integration."
"I would like to see more iterations and direct integration with other solutions."
"I would like to see the management layer improved."
"In our current configuration, we can only run the line controllers in high availability, active-standby mode, whereas we would like to see active-active implemented."
"The rail system that Pavilion uses to mount up into a standard Dell or APC cabinet extends further back than normal rails, and they cover up the zero PDU slot. So, I don't like the rail system that comes with the device. That is my biggest complaint."
More Pavilion HyperParallel Flash Array Pricing and Cost Advice →
Huawei OceanStor is ranked 16th in All-Flash Storage Arrays with 8 reviews while Pavilion HyperParallel Flash Array is ranked 19th in All-Flash Storage Arrays with 3 reviews. Huawei OceanStor is rated 8.6, while Pavilion HyperParallel Flash Array is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Huawei OceanStor writes "Its management interface it's quite simple". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pavilion HyperParallel Flash Array writes "Good support, improves performance, scales well, and boosts team efficiency". Huawei OceanStor is most compared with Huawei OceanStor Dorado, NetApp AFF (All Flash FAS), Dell Unity XT, Pure Storage FlashArray and IBM FlashSystem, whereas Pavilion HyperParallel Flash Array is most compared with Pure FlashArray X NVMe, VAST Data and Pure Storage FlashBlade. See our Huawei OceanStor vs. Pavilion HyperParallel Flash Array report.
See our list of best All-Flash Storage Arrays vendors.
We monitor all All-Flash Storage Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
