HPE BladeSystem vs HPE NonStop comparison

HPE BladeSystem and HPE NonStop are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. HPE BladeSystem is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while HPE NonStop is ranked #11. HPE BladeSystem holds a 13.9% mindshare in Blade Servers, compared to HPE NonStop’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of HPE BladeSystem users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of HPE NonStop users who would recommend it.

HPE BladeSystem

Read 139 HPE BladeSystem reviews

1,900 Views
1,881 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

HPE NonStop

Read 12 HPE NonStop reviews

811 Views
811 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

HPE BladeSystem

HPE NonStop

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

HPE BladeSystem and HPE NonStop are both key components in HPE's server portfolio, competing in the enterprise data center space. While HPE NonStop has advantages in fault tolerance and continuous availability, HPE BladeSystem provides benefits with its modular design and cost-effectiveness.

Features: HPE BladeSystem is appreciated for its modular architecture, flexibility, and energy efficiency, which support a range of workloads. On the other hand, HPE NonStop features include unmatched fault tolerance, high scalability, and continuous availability, making it ideal for mission-critical applications.

Room for Improvement: HPE BladeSystem could improve by enhancing its fault tolerance, offering better integration with existing IT infrastructure, and increasing scalability options. HPE NonStop could benefit from simplifying its deployment process, reducing its initial setup cost, and improving user-friendliness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE BladeSystem is known for its simple deployment model and positive customer service feedback, making implementation straightforward. HPE NonStop, although more complex to deploy due to its advanced features, is supported by a responsive service team that helps manage this complexity effectively.

Pricing and ROI: HPE BladeSystem presents a more accessible price point and offers a favorable ROI for general enterprise needs. In contrast, HPE NonStop requires a higher initial investment but provides a long-term ROI by minimizing downtime and reducing maintenance for critical applications.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE NonStop Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE NonStop

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,803 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem

Ranking in Blade Servers

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

139

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE NonStop

Ranking in Blade Servers

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of HPE BladeSystem is 13.9%, down from 15.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE NonStop is 4.2%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Blade Servers

Featured Reviews

Fatai Akinwande

Specialist Datacenter and Server at IHS Towers

Enables you to manage all resources from a single dashboard using the OneView feature

In terms of improvements, I'd suggest enhancing the stability of the HPE BladeSystem, especially regarding network connectivity. We once had an issue where a system didn’t communicate with the network, and it took a while to diagnose the problem. Eventually, we discovered it was a motherboard issue, but we initially thought it was the network card. Improving the onboard administratordashboard to provide more granular insights, like clearly identifying faultycomponents, would make troubleshooting much more efficient. Aside from that, the system is superb and has been reliable.

Read full review

Roni Wijaya

Vice President of It Operations at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

With a perfect record for uptime, the solution ensures a return on investment

Since it is a legacy tool, there is a need to change it for flexibility. I think now it has improved because the security is very good. It is very secure for the performance of the machine critical application service, and it is very good. I don't know how to speak more on improvement needed because it's a good enough tool. However, depending on the application, it's limited. Not a lot of applications run on HPE NonStop. It is not flexible because I know that because of the compatibility of Java with HPE NonStop. When we are using Java, the performance is not good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Uptime and service are valuable for us. When we have an issue, uptime and being able to get an emergency replacement or actual service is the most important thing for us."

"It is very stable."

"It is easy to scale if you have the licensing."

"The product has a lot of options for checking servers and IoT ports using artificial intelligence."

"The monitoring and support HP provides is far better compared to other systems, and if we are using HP servers along with HP tools such as HP Service Manager and HP OpenView for integrating server management and automating incident management systems, it is quite helpful and the best in the market currently."

"The technical support is good."

"This has drastically reduced our datacenter space, has good cooling and power consumption."

"When it comes to the BladeSystem, what we love about it most is being able to actually manage it using OneView."

More HPE BladeSystem pros

"Feature-wise, the most valuable one is the fact that it has 100 hundred percent uptime every year. Secondly, it is stable."

"We don't have any issues with the stability of HPE NonStop."

"The stability of HPE NonStop is good."

Cons

"It may be coming to its end of life."

"Some part of virtual connections needs improvement."

"There is always room for improvement everywhere with the HPE BladeSystem."

"It could always use new tools."

"There could be more management capability to work with integrations."

"Improving HPE BladeSystem could involve enhancing the customization features which are currently less robust than other tools in the market that offer drag and drop modules."

"HPE has a replacement system called Synergy, though it’s a more high-end system than the old C7000."

"HPE BladeSystem could improve the communication between the server and the storage."

More HPE BladeSystem cons

"It is not flexible...Not a lot of applications run on HPE NonStop."

"It would be helpful if they brought the price down."

"HPE NonStop could improve by having infrastructure management."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licenses for HPE BladeSystem are perpetual."

"The pricing is competitive."

"We have been satisfied with the price. However, there are additional costs for support."

"The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."

"I would recommend this solution for large enterprises. Medium-sized companies would find it difficult to afford the HPE BladeSystem's overall capital expenses."

"There is a one-time purchase for the HPE BladeSystem."

"it would make everyone happy if the solution were less expensive."

"The HPE BladeSystem is an expensive solution."

More HPE BladeSystem pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

"The price of the solution is too high. If they lowered the price substantially it would open up more opportunities. It's considered a replacement for the old 9000 boxes of HP. If it had a lower price, we would be able to compete in the financial, and other sectors and other solutions such as Terraform. Having a high price makes other solutions more attractive."

"HPE NonStop is definitely on the higher end."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

22%

Retailer

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE BladeSystem?

The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?

With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 62% of the time

Dell PowerEdge M vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 9% of the time

HPE Superdome X vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 7% of the time

Supermicro SuperBlade vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 5% of the time

More HPE BladeSystem Competitors

HPE Superdome X vs HPE NonStop

Compared 38% of the time

Dell PowerEdge M vs HPE NonStop

Compared 30% of the time

Fujitsu CX1000 vs HPE NonStop

Compared 18% of the time

HPE Synergy vs HPE NonStop

Compared 14% of the time

More HPE NonStop Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem

July 2025

Download HPE BladeSystem product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE NonStop

July 2025

Download HPE NonStop product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem

HP NonStop, HPE Integrity NonStop

Overview

HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

When availability matters, the new HPE Integrity NonStop X enables you to stay ahead of your competition by mitigating the risk of downtime and effortlessly meeting your business processing, OLTP, and database requirements all with an industry-standard x86 architecture. HPE brings you an unparalleled portfolio of HPE Integrity NonStop systems the NonStop i family and the NonStop X family. These systems deliver the highest level of availability for the most-demanding, high-value workloads and customer-facing applications.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

EMIS Health

Bankart, Capital Securities Corporation

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE NonStop

July 2025

Free Report: HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE NonStop

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE NonStop and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE NonStop report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.