We performed a comparison between HPE BladeSystem and HPE NonStop based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."They are reliable, and they hardly break down. They are fast, and they serve us very well."
"Basically, in a cluster, it works really nicely, especially within a cluster environment. Also, it's easily configurable."
"The solution has good scalability."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"One of the most valuable features I have found to be the enclosure. It is really easy to manage and everything is integrated. You are able to upgrade the software quite easily."
"For me, the most valuable features are integration and simple defining."
"The interface and dashboard are excellent and user-friendly."
"It also has a pretty solid design and management."
"We don't have any issues with the stability of HPE NonStop."
"Feature-wise, the most valuable one is the fact that it has 100 hundred percent uptime every year. Secondly, it is stable."
"The stability of HPE NonStop is good."
"The interface in terms of management could be much more intuitive."
"For me, the product is okay, but I would probably suggest improvement in their services or technical support. They need to work harder in the preventative maintenance of the system. They need to improve in terms of how quickly can we get attention and how quickly problems are resolved. Its price could also be lower."
"We have not needed to contact support because we have not had an issue. However, the partner support we had could improve. There are some disadvantages compared to Dell. The questions that are asked from the support are too lengthy, this causes a delay in support."
"Currently, in the case of a disk failure there is a need to remove the whole bay and as a result, to disconnect all the other disks."
"We sometimes have compatibility issues depending on the browser that you are using. For example, sometimes you have to switch between Edge, Mozilla, Internet Explorer, or Chrome to have things operating correctly."
"If you compare it with Lenovo systems, the pricing is too high."
"The management side of this solution could be improved."
"The tool must provide integration with the cloud."
"It would be helpful if they brought the price down."
"It is not flexible...Not a lot of applications run on HPE NonStop."
"HPE NonStop could improve by having infrastructure management."
HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 134 reviews while HPE NonStop is ranked 9th in Blade Servers with 12 reviews. HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.6, while HPE NonStop is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Very reliable, expands well, and is pretty simple to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE NonStop writes "With a perfect record for uptime, the solution ensures a return on investment". HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series, Dell PowerEdge M, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE Superdome X, whereas HPE NonStop is most compared with HPE Superdome X, Dell PowerEdge M and Fujitsu CX1000. See our HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE NonStop report.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
