Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer vs OpenText AI Operations Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer
Ranking in IT Operations Analytics
13th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
3.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText AI Operations Mana...
Ranking in IT Operations Analytics
7th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
Event Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Operations Analytics category, the mindshare of Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer is 2.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText AI Operations Management is 4.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Operations Analytics Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText AI Operations Management4.0%
Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer2.7%
Other93.3%
IT Operations Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

Bratislav Petkovic - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead for Core Infrastructure at Raiffeisen bank Serbia
Performance monitoring impacts operations with fast storage setup
Having eyes on performance for storage through the Analyzer is valuable for me. The Ops center from Hitachi lets us see all storage in one place, unlike Dell and EMC, where we work on one storage. The Analyzer and the Ops center provide a better solution. Before this, we used a CVP with slow performance. This solution works better than before. The visualization vector in the last version is something we have. It is easy to work with and add the storage type. There is no difficulty in adding it.
reviewer2060121 - PeerSpot reviewer
Product Line Manager at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
Unified monitoring has improved event handling but needs stronger AI automation and modern dashboards
OpenText AI Operations Management could benefit from a fully integrated AI system, which we call AIOps. A fully integrated AI operations system would be valuable in the future. Additionally, the UI experience could be more comfortable. We are not using predictive features in OpenText AI Operations Management such as anomaly detection. In the future, we may be able to operate with our customer, but we need to decide this collectively. You need to see the big picture and understand what the customer's pain points are to find the right tuning. Normally, predictive features can be more useful, but this is an end-to-end solution that needs to be customized. You need to understand the exact customer needs. The predictive analytics feature is very close to being integrated, but it is not fully integrated at this time.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Having eyes on performance for storage through the Analyzer is valuable for me."
"It was easy to set up."
"The Ops center from Hitachi lets us see all storage in one place, unlike Dell and EMC, where we work on one storage."
"It was easy to set up."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its grouping scripts and event focus."
"The integration with the ticketing tool makes sure that there is a record for every issue."
"It is stable."
"I rate OpenText Operations Bridge as a solid nine on a scale of one to ten."
"The most valuable aspect of Operations Bridge for us is its integration capabilities."
"From our monitoring perspective or from a visibility perspective, HPE UCMDB is a must have. It's an amazing piece of software."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with everything."
"The event correlation is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
 

Cons

"I do not have any notes for improvement."
"Very limited people are available with resource availability in this region, and they have limited knowledge."
"The dashboard needs improvement."
"The service takes a very long time to start and it requires a lot of resources."
"The predictive analytics feature is very close to being integrated, but it is not fully integrated at this time."
"Reporting has to be tackled a bit more. Conceptually, it is there and conceptually it is amazing, but somehow the module itself is suffering."
"I'm not aware of areas that need improvement."
"We need improvements in delivering quality reports from OBM and in integrating Operations Bridge with other components like UCMDB for asset discovery."
"The price is quite expensive, and because of this, we may try another solution."
"Remove the dependency of Java technology. This is a feature used for admin purposes to update the modeling."
"It is a very complicated product. It's difficult to manage. Nowadays, products are very easy to manage, deploy, and integrate, but Operations Bridge is very complicated to manage."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Pricing is very flexible and depends on the modules selected as per the requirement."
"It is competitive."
"As OpsBridge is a suite of products bundled together, you may find yourself paying for software functionality that you don't actually use, e.g. Real User Monitor (RUM)."
"The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices and features such as infrastructure monitoring, analytic dashboard, and business dashboard in your model."
"The cost is very high."
"Setup costs can be high depending on the partner, but it is worth it."
"The licensing cost for this solution is approximately $1,000 USD."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Performing Arts
9%
Outsourcing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise35
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer?
We received Ops common and the Analyzer when we bought Hitachi storage. I do not know the price for the analysis.
What is your primary use case for Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer?
We use the Analyzer for monitoring storage performance and for any alerts. We have to analyze the machine, one at the head office and a second on the Doctor site. It collects information from the s...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?
From a cost perspective, OpenText Operations Bridge is cost-effective as it saves us man hours. What used to be done manually by a person is now done automatically. With its automation capabilities...
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Operations Bridge?
OpenText AI Operations Management could benefit from a fully integrated AI system, which we call AIOps. A fully integrated AI operations system would be valuable in the future. Additionally, the UI...
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?
I am not looking for a monitoring solution, but I am a product manager comparing some products based on research I conducted on the PeerSpot website regarding monitoring products such as Splunk, Ap...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Operations Bridge, Operations Bridge Manager, Micro Focus Operations Analytics
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
GE Money Bank, Bank AlJazira, Tech Mahindra
Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi Ops Center Analyzer vs. OpenText AI Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.