"It can still be configured by a separate team other than developers. That's why I think it's more secure."
"The interface is very simple to navigate."
"We were using it because we have compliance requirements around secret management. Having a secure vault and encrypting data was an additional requirement. When we looked at it first, we were just looking for a vault, like a lockbox. The greatest benefit of HashiCorp is its ability to manage encryption on the fly. It provides encryption of data at rest, in use, in transit, on the fly, and linked with applications, which was really attractive."
"The solution is stable. It has been working perfectly without any problem."
"The most valuable feature of HashiCorp Vault is that it's an open source solution. Second, it's cloud agnostic, so it's very easy to maintain and control, which is why we prefer HashiCorp."
"The security provided is very enhanced and it does a great job of keeping passwords safe."
"I don't think there are any major improvements required—so far, so good. However, I think that having more training materials, such as videos, and documentation available would be helpful. I would prefer to have more videos available either on the official site or on YouTube."
"The technical support was hard to get a hold of and lacking in service."
"The solution could be much easier to implement."
"In terms of features, the only thing that I found a little bit hinky was that there was no revocation or deletion on the model we were using. Once in a financial year, a client interacts, and you pay for that client for the year. So, there are just little things like that in the pricing. There should be more clarity around the end of the key. I know there is no system like this. They all are the same. I tested Microsoft, Google, and some others, and none of them really want you to delete a key, which makes sense. You delete a key, and you lose everything that it has wrapped or encrypted, but it's actually just a language. Deletion isn't really deletion. It's really revocation, but overall, HashiCorp Vault ticked all the boxes for us, and I couldn't fault it."
"We could use more documentation, primarily to do with integrations."
"It's a pretty technical solution. It's designed for more technical people."
Earn 20 points
HashiCorp Vault is ranked 4th in Enterprise Password Managers with 5 reviews while ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is ranked 9th in Enterprise Password Managers with 1 review. HashiCorp Vault is rated 8.0, while ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of HashiCorp Vault writes "Provides the ability to manage encryption on the fly, has multiple authentication methods, and makes it easy to manage the lifecycle of a key". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Password Manager Pro writes "Easy to use with good documentation and excellent password security". HashiCorp Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault, Delinea Secret Server and Akeyless Secrets Management, whereas ManageEngine Password Manager Pro is most compared with Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, LastPass Business and WALLIX Bastion.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
