No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Harness vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.3
Harness enhanced deployment efficiency and error reduction, yielding significant ROI through automation and AI-driven cost-saving strategies.
Sentiment score
5.5
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management boosts ROI by saving time, reducing manual tasks, and optimizing license management for cost efficiency.
The AI features that they have and with which we can rewrite the pipeline and troubleshoot issues significantly saved time.
Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees
By adopting templates and various different pipelines across our own IDP platform, we have saved upwards of 30 to 40% of development time.
Technical Associate at ZS
With Harness, the release process decreased from three or four hours to one or two hours, making deployments much quicker.
Software Engineer at Citi
We can remove or add licenses according to business requirements, and it is all controlled within the application.
Manager, Information Technology Support at FEFundInfo
The client was already paying for Microsoft Intune and was able to decommission Ivanti Neurons for UEM.
Lead Consultant at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Tasks such as patching, software deployment, and troubleshooting that earlier took hours are now done in minutes.
Soc Analyst 11 at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
Harness offers reliable, responsive customer service and well-structured documentation, providing efficient issue resolution and high user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.2
Ivanti's customer support is responsive and competent, with occasional integration issues and calls for improved communication and efficiency.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
IT Analyst | Aws Cloud Ops | Dev Ops | Fin Ops at Tata Consultancy
We have not faced any customer support issues, with tickets resolved in less than a four-day SLA.
Quality Engineering Lead at a logistics company with 51-200 employees
There was an instance when I faced issues with third-party plugins, and after raising a support ticket, they responded in a few hours with a documentation link that resolved my issue.
Senior Software Engineer 2 at Porch
I am concerned about consistently needing to call support for installing brand new solutions.
CEO at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
They are responsive, stick to time, and are enthusiastic about helping.
IT Administrator at FPT Software Strategic Unit no 17
Occasionally, we also experienced delays between systems, particularly with user group changes and device compliance updates.
Director at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Harness effectively scales SaaS environments, supports complex workflows, but may face stability issues with simultaneous service integrations.
Sentiment score
7.4
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is scalable, efficiently managing devices from small to large enterprises, with room for automation improvement.
Our entire organization uses it with hundreds of applications, and it supports this scale effectively.
Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
It is able to work on our infrastructure side, which is EKS, and we are able to handle our organization growth effectively for an enterprise use case.
Technical Associate at ZS
When I integrated Harness to more than 20 applications in one place, it becomes less stable.
Software Engineer at Citi
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten.
IT System Specialist at Conseil de l Europe
There is no limitation in scalability; Ivanti Neurons for MDM is very scalable.
Solutions Architect at M.Tech
As a Microsoft consultant, I think Intune is always going to win over anything else if the client is already paying for an E3 or E5 license.
Lead Consultant at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Harness is considered stable and reliable, although integration with many applications may occasionally affect stability.
Sentiment score
8.0
Ivanti Neurons for UEM is stable, praised for reducing downtime despite support and integration enhancement suggestions.
Harness is completely stable, and we are using it in production without facing any stability issues at all.
Quality Engineering Lead at a logistics company with 51-200 employees
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
IT Analyst | Aws Cloud Ops | Dev Ops | Fin Ops at Tata Consultancy
Harness is decently stable.
Technical Associate at ZS
We have not seen any downtime.
Principal Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Regarding the self-healing capabilities, I would say it has reduced downtime by around thirty to forty percent.
Technical Account Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
It delivers very good UEM capabilities.
Director at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Simplify configuration, improve UI, expand features, clarify pricing, and enhance security to improve accessibility and functionality for smaller teams.
Ivanti's usability, integrations, and support need improvements, including navigation, pricing, language, training, stability, and reporting system enhancements.
There is not a lot of good support for pipeline as code, and I often find myself not using pipeline as code the way other platforms such as GitHub Actions or Jenkins integrate pipeline as code.
Technical Associate at ZS
Improved documentation and onboarding tutorials would help accelerate adoption.
Cloud Platform at Futurescape
Harness can be improved by providing more clarity on the credits it issues for Harness Cloud, as it has a tiered pricing structure involving license and credit costs, which can get confusing.
Quality Engineering Lead at a logistics company with 51-200 employees
It would be helpful if the documentation could easily help us fix bugs on our own.
IT Administrator at FPT Software Strategic Unit no 17
The test team or the testing procedures are flawed because they release new versions with numerous basic issues.
CEO at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
The history of patching is missing from the solution, making it a challenge.
IT System Specialist at Conseil de l Europe
 

Setup Cost

Harness pricing is higher than open-source but justified by benefits, with room for improvement in licensing cost noted.
Ivanti pricing ranges from $8 to $45 per node annually, considered mid- to high-range compared to alternatives.
From what I understand with respect to Harness, licensing and setup costs were relatively low for an enterprise, and the pricing was more catered toward enterprises who would invest in the technology.
Technical Associate at ZS
The licensing cost is a little bit too high.
Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees
This is not a cheap solution.
CEO at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Regarding pricing, I would say Ivanti Neurons for UEM falls at a nine out of ten.
Technical Account Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
The price for this solution seems to be reasonable for my company.
IT System Specialist at Conseil de l Europe
 

Valuable Features

Harness simplifies CI/CD automation with AI-driven processes, enhancing deployment speed and reliability while reducing risks and manual effort.
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management enhances efficiency with AI automation, centralized management, user-friendly interface, and comprehensive policy enforcement.
Harness uses AI to suggest errors in case of deployment failures.
Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The platform also supports cloud-native environments and Kubernetes deployments, making pipeline management easier, and its automation capabilities significantly improve speed and reliability.
Cloud Platform at Futurescape
If something goes wrong, I can use AI troubleshooting to build or test my fails and analyze the logs, suggesting the fixes.
Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees
The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date.
IT System Specialist at Conseil de l Europe
It integrates into InTune, which enables us to detect, diagnose, and fix issues without manual intervention.
Technical Account Manager at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
AI-powered automation and self-healing are additional features that automatically fix common issues and reduce manual work.
Soc Analyst 11 at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Harness
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Build Automation (5th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Feature Management (2nd)
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint ...
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
19th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
IT Asset Management (8th), Vulnerability Management (25th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (6th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (5th), Mobile Threat Defense (5th), Patch Management (5th), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (18th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (6th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (8th), Autonomous Endpoint Management (4th)
 

Featured Reviews

MK
Technical Associate at ZS
Templatized pipelines have improved efficiency while limitations in code-based development remain
Harness UI can do a lot of good things. Harness's UI should not feel very complicated. At the current stage, it feels very commercialized and compared to other platforms such as Argo CD or Jenkins, which feel much more lively and much more simple. Infrastructure as code or pipeline as code is something that Harness severely lacks. There is not a lot of good support for pipeline as code, and I often find myself not using pipeline as code the way other platforms such as GitHub Actions or Jenkins integrate pipeline as code. Pipeline as code is definitely one of the disadvantages when it comes to Harness. Additionally, the entire platform feels very commercialized, which is something that a lot of developers, especially open-source enthusiasts, might not appreciate even within the organization. One of the very important key factors I observed was that there is no way to execute nested pipelines, which means that we cannot execute child pipelines within child pipelines and child pipelines even within those child pipelines. There is no way to execute nested pipeline execution, which may or may not be required based on the use case, but it is definitely one of those features that I wish the platform had.
reviewer2882148 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Automated onboarding has saved hundreds of hours and now standardizes device security globally
In terms of how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, I think there's potential for automation of some repetitive tasks. The device provisioning process has already become very close to zero-touch, but the patch deployment is still scheduled and policy-driven. As a result, I believe we can reduce endpoint administration further. I also think the number of integrations and the scalability of the tool can be improved, along with customer service, as we've encountered some issues in certain countries. Regarding the needed improvements, particularly concerning integrations or customer service challenges, we have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing. Occasionally, we also experienced delays between systems, particularly with user group changes and device compliance updates. The accuracy and reliability of output from Ivanti's AI can be improved. We notice that the AI-driven insights are useful, but there are anomalies and some false positives. Since we are still in a validation period, I cannot provide a definitive mark, but I believe that accuracy should be enhanced, especially for more complex and environment-specific issues where human intervention is still needed.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise21
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Harness?
There are some UI components that can be improved. The needed UI improvements include more graphs, more history, the ability to create pipelines through the UI, and more interactions, with UI compo...
What is your primary use case for Harness?
My main use case for Harness is to create pipelines, deploy applications, and manage security pipelines. I use Harness to deploy applications to EC2 instances and Kubernetes instances, and I create...
What advice do you have for others considering Harness?
My advice for others looking into using Harness is to use AI capabilities, create pipelines, and then use it to deploy. Harness is a good tool. I would rate this review a nine out of ten.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?
Regarding pricing, I would say Ivanti Neurons for UEM falls at a nine out of ten.
What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for UEM?
The price being quite high and the limited container storage are areas that have room for improvement.
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?
I use Ivanti Neurons for UEM for mobile device management, and I can describe the use case. The remote device management feature has helped our remote work strategy because manual intervention is n...
 

Also Known As

Armory
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management,Ivanti Neurons for RBVM,Ivanti Neurons for VULN KB,Ivanti Mobile Threat Defense,Ivanti Neurons for Spend Intelligence, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, Ivanti Neurons for EASM
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced
Frontier Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix, IBM, Microsoft and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: July 2026.
909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.