GTB Technologies Inspector vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention comparison

GTB Technologies and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. GTB Technologies is ranked #30, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8. GTB Technologies holds a 1.7% mindshare in DLP, compared to Microsoft’s 8.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GTB Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

GTB Technologies Inspector

Read 8 GTB Technologies Inspector reviews

1,158 Views
1,123 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Data Loss...

Read 31 Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention reviews

7,456 Views
6,188 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

GTB Technologies Inspector

Microsoft Purview Data Loss...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

GTB Technologies Inspector and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention compete in the field of data protection solutions. Microsoft Purview has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and strong integration with Microsoft ecosystem services.

Features: GTB Technologies Inspector provides real-time data discovery, risk analysis, and control over sensitive information. Microsoft Purview offers extensive data classification, regulatory compliance improvements, and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365, covering a broader scope of protection.

Room for Improvement: GTB could enhance its interoperability with diverse software environments and expand its data classification capabilities. It might also benefit from additional integration options with third-party applications. Microsoft Purview could enhance its cost-efficiency and reduce complexity for new users, and further optimize its mobile device management capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GTB Technologies Inspector offers an easy deployment model with minimal disruption and highly responsive customer service. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention benefits from integration with Microsoft 365, enabling streamlined deployment for users within the Microsoft ecosystem and strong ongoing support.

Pricing and ROI: GTB Technologies Inspector presents a cost-effective solution with flexible pricing and user-friendly payment options, leading to significant ROI. In contrast, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, while having higher setup costs, provides substantial ROI through its advanced features and integration benefits, appealing to those seeking comprehensive data governance solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,435 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GTB Technologies Inspector

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

30th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Purview Data Loss...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of GTB Technologies Inspector is 1.7%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is 8.9%, down from 15.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention	8.9%
GTB Technologies Inspector	1.7%
Other	89.4%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Marcelo Grandchamp

General Manager (Founder and Owner) at nnhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/marcelograndchamp/ovax

Enables organizations to monitor the network and protect themselves from data leakage

The initial setup process is very simple and easy. We have no issues to do it for ourselves or our customers. The deployment takes less than 20 days. The integration is very simple. However, first, we must understand what we want to have on our network and what we want to prevent. If we don't have this information before we start the configuration, we will be lost. We must know what kind of protection we need in our company. We have LGPD in Brazil. It is similar to GDPR in Europe. It prevents any personal information from being linked to other companies without permission. We have to take care of the personal information of our customers, employees, and partners. To deploy the tool, we must understand what we need to do. We must download the whole package and have our infrastructure ready to receive it. We must get the SSL certification and start to configure our platform. When the process is finished, we must roll out a small portion of our network to ensure everything will be well. After that, we must do the full rollout.

Read full review

ClayHampton

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Protects sensitive data across devices and helps address client compliance needs proactively

The reporting in Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is a little easier than most Microsoft portals. I understand the licensing cost, especially if you're a Business Premium or in the SMB world, and a lot of clients run with a Business Premium. That comes with data loss prevention in a manual process, whereas E5 gives automation. Microsoft has said, 'Okay, here's your Microsoft 365 E5 compliance add-on that can go on the Business Premium.' So Business Premium users can get the data loss prevention features of E5, which is fantastic. That was the big point that they were missing, and I'm glad that they actually have an add-on now that makes it possible. So truly, I don't think there's a downside. Maybe more reporting, but that's it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The monitoring features are valuable."

"They have a fingerprint feature that is very awesome. OCR is very awesome to have too."

"The product has a centralized console for everything."

"The most valuable feature is we can develop what we want. If we have an old or new requirement, they are able to support us to develop it all within one month."

"I am impressed with the tool's ease of deployment."

"The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification. You can use the same agent. In terms of licensing too, it has a single license. When it comes to data classification, it supports open-source document platforms such as ChainSoft and OpenOffice."

"The classifications in place are very helpful in making policies for ensuring sensitive data can be contained."

"This solution helps classify what is confidential and what is not, allowing products to be installed at home if they do not contain confidential information."

"Microsoft Purview has helped improve my company's ability to discover sensitive data, as most companies would say that they improved in the whole posture on this field."

"The most valuable features are identifying sensitive data and issuing alerts."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention makes it way easier to prevent unauthorized sharing of sensitive information within the organization."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's responses are faster. Its installation is also reliable. The security score helps with the security part."

"We can use Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to manage devices and site policies."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention protects the organization from user data getting out that should not be out and works very well when assessing the ability to prevent unauthorized sharing of sensitive information."

"Insider risk management and data retention are beneficial."

"If we can prevent information from going out, eventually, when a regulator is asking about our security measures, we can show what we've been doing."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention pros

Cons

"It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent."

"To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones."

"The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements."

"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well."

"The tool should include better AI features."

"The product needs to improve its support so that users can just log in and create tickets as opposed to sending emails. Sending emails is difficult to track. It also needs to work on its analytics platform."

"The solution’s performance must be improved."

"The performance could be better."

"I rate the overall solution 3 out of 10."

"A site can have different containers where you store data. We have always wanted to apply compliance, labels, and policies at the container level, rather than to an outer shell or at the site level. That is something we have been looking forward to and I believe Microsoft is already planning something like that."

"There is a lot of ambiguity when you are setting up labels, such as sensitive information labels. It is a little daunting at first if you don't have prior knowledge, and there is a little bit of a learning curve for setting up the labels. Some of the setup wizards could be more helpful from an AI perspective. They can streamline the setup through more AI technologies so that you don't have to jump through so many hoops and different menus and dropdowns. It would be useful to have a setup wizard that is more hands-off and engaging for setting up the information type labels. If you tell them this is what we're trying to protect, it should basically start to lead you down that path of best practices. Such a feature would be great."

"I would like Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to be on the source code or SQL databases. It is difficult to do classification and labeling when you have a third-party source code or a third-party Oracle database. It is seamless when it comes to Microsoft documents but is not so with third-party source codes. Microsoft needs to work on it a little bit more."

"At this time, I have not seen a return on investment with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention."

"I see that there's a lot of content in Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, and when I click on it and look around, I wonder what certain features do, but there's not enough documentation and explanation."

"The scalability, in terms of the portal, could be more user-friendly. Sometimes I have faced difficulties in identifying the options."

"I would say the improvement of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention could be in the propagation of policies, as if you create a policy, it may take up to 48 hours to propagate to devices, and this might take a little bit longer than ideal."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool has a fair price."

"When comparing GTB Technologies Inspector to other solutions you receive a good value for your money when considering all the features and benefits."

"They offer a lot of features in a single bundle. So, if you want to remove some features from GTB, you can remove those. You don't need to buy those, and the price will reduce accordingly. I am very happy with the pricing."

"The tool is not expensive."

"Its price is very reasonable and competitive."

"The tool's pricing is affordable and based on the number of endpoints."

"If one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the price as one out of ten."

"The solution’s pricing is reasonable."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The product has the best price-to-performance ratio."

"The cost works out to about $15 per user per month."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is part of a bundle and is not sold as a standalone product."

"You get the solution in a bundle if you get the E5 suite."

"Though I am not a specialist, the tool is quite expensive."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,435 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with GTB Technologies Inspector?

The tool should include better AI features. It must enable us to make some predictions based on the behavior of my network or the end users.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GTB Technologies Inspector?

We use Microsoft 365. We use GTB Technologies Inspector as a CASB solution to protect us from any data leakage in Microsoft 365. We can monitor the network all the time to see all the data that is ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering GTB Technologies Inspector?

The maintenance is easy. We are resellers and partners. We have technical people specialized in maintenance. The TCO is very low. Sometimes, we have to upgrade to keep the solution on the latest ve...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?

The pricing of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is acceptable for us.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?

I think that a feature on the side where you could click on something with a question mark, and then if you click on it, it would open up a new window and give you more information on that, almost ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?

My main use case is to upload mailboxes. We're using Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to upload mailboxes. The migration tool that's built into the Microsoft Hybrid isn't working on our domai...

See all answers

Comparisons

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 26% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 20% of the time

Safetica ONE vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 11% of the time

Trellix DLP vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 9% of the time

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 5% of the time

More GTB Technologies Inspector Competitors

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 9% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon Macie vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 7% of the time

Trellix DLP vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

January 2026

Download GTB Technologies Inspector product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

December 2025

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

Inspector, GTB Technologies DLP

Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention, MS Endpoint DLP, Microsoft Endpoint DLP

Overview

Inspector is Inspection Software to manage any type of inspection to aid compliance, reduce risk, eliminate paperwork, and make you audit ready. Define what you want to inspect, when, the checks to be carried out, set pass, fail criteria, define incident creation rules, workflow and resolution deadlines. Use the mobile application to perform inspections on smart phone, tablet or mobile computer. Dashboards show compliance, incident rates and resolution activity. Start a 30 day free trial today.

GTB Technologies

At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Supya Security Software

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

December 2025

Free Report: GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,435 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.