GTB Technologies Inspector vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention comparison

Why PeerSpot?

GTB Technologies and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. GTB Technologies is ranked #25, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.8. GTB Technologies holds a 1.9% mindshare in DLP, compared to Microsoft’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GTB Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

GTB Technologies Inspector

Read 8 GTB Technologies Inspector reviews

4,184 Views
4,017 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Purview Data Loss...

Read 36 Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention reviews

12,305 Views
10,213 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

GTB Technologies Inspector

Microsoft Purview Data Loss...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

GTB Technologies Inspector and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention compete in the field of data protection solutions. Microsoft Purview has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and strong integration with Microsoft ecosystem services.

Features: GTB Technologies Inspector provides real-time data discovery, risk analysis, and control over sensitive information. Microsoft Purview offers extensive data classification, regulatory compliance improvements, and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365, covering a broader scope of protection.

Room for Improvement: GTB could enhance its interoperability with diverse software environments and expand its data classification capabilities. It might also benefit from additional integration options with third-party applications. Microsoft Purview could enhance its cost-efficiency and reduce complexity for new users, and further optimize its mobile device management capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GTB Technologies Inspector offers an easy deployment model with minimal disruption and highly responsive customer service. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention benefits from integration with Microsoft 365, enabling streamlined deployment for users within the Microsoft ecosystem and strong ongoing support.

Pricing and ROI: GTB Technologies Inspector presents a cost-effective solution with flexible pricing and user-friendly payment options, leading to significant ROI. In contrast, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, while having higher setup costs, provides substantial ROI through its advanced features and integration benefits, appealing to those seeking comprehensive data governance solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GTB Technologies Inspector

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

25th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Purview Data Loss...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of GTB Technologies Inspector is 1.9%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is 5.6%, down from 11.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention	5.6%
GTB Technologies Inspector	1.9%
Other	92.5%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Marcelo Grandchamp

General Manager (Founder and Owner) at nnhttps://www.linkedin.com/in/marcelograndchamp/ovax

Enables organizations to monitor the network and protect themselves from data leakage

The initial setup process is very simple and easy. We have no issues to do it for ourselves or our customers. The deployment takes less than 20 days. The integration is very simple. However, first, we must understand what we want to have on our network and what we want to prevent. If we don't have this information before we start the configuration, we will be lost. We must know what kind of protection we need in our company. We have LGPD in Brazil. It is similar to GDPR in Europe. It prevents any personal information from being linked to other companies without permission. We have to take care of the personal information of our customers, employees, and partners. To deploy the tool, we must understand what we need to do. We must download the whole package and have our infrastructure ready to receive it. We must get the SSL certification and start to configure our platform. When the process is finished, we must roll out a small portion of our network to ensure everything will be well. After that, we must do the full rollout.

Read full review

Rohit Jaiswar

Soc Anaylst at Softcell Technologies Limited

Integrated controls have reduced insider risk and now protect sensitive data across our workforce

One standout feature about Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is the tight integration with Insider Risk Management and Defender XDR, as it gives much better context during investigations instead of treating DLP as an isolated alerting tool. We also use endpoint DLP heavily to control USB, copy, print, clipboard, and browser upload activity, which has been very effective for remote workforce security. The best features Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention offers include real-time policy enforcement, endpoint DLP, and deep integration with Microsoft 365 plus Defender XDR. We also heavily rely on sensitive information type detection, adaptive policy tips, and insider risk integration to investigate suspicious user behavior with proper context. Another standout feature is the ability to control USB copy, browser uploads, print clipboards, and cloud sharing actions directly from endpoint policies. The integration with Microsoft Defender 365 and Defender XDR helps our team in day-to-day operations because DLP alerts are automatically correlated with endpoint identity, email, and user activity telemetry, which helps the SOC investigate incidents much faster from a single workflow. The sensitive information type detection makes a difference compared to other tools we have used because it is more effective than many legacy DLP tools. It understands context, exact data patterns, document labeling, and Microsoft 365 native content, reducing false positives while improving detection accuracy. Another strong feature of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is auto-labeling and policy inheritance with Microsoft's Information Protection, which helps maintain protection even after files are shared or moved across workloads. We also value the user coaching or policy tip capability because it educates users in real time instead of only blocking actions, which reduces repeated DLP violations significantly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The monitoring features are valuable."

"The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification. You can use the same agent. In terms of licensing too, it has a single license. When it comes to data classification, it supports open-source document platforms such as ChainSoft and OpenOffice."

"They have a fingerprint feature that is very awesome. OCR is very awesome to have too."

"I am impressed with the tool's ease of deployment."

"The most valuable feature is we can develop what we want. If we have an old or new requirement, they are able to support us to develop it all within one month."

"When comparing GTB Technologies Inspector to other solutions you receive a good value for your money when considering all the features and benefits."

"The product has a centralized console for everything."

"All features in GTB are very valuable and effective."

More GTB Technologies Inspector pros

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention protects the organization from user data getting out that should not be out and works very well when assessing the ability to prevent unauthorized sharing of sensitive information."

"The solution's IDM (Indexed Document Matching), EDM (Exact Data Matching), and DCM (Described Content Matching) features have been most effective in identifying and mitigating potential data leaks."

"We can use Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention to manage devices and site policies."

"It has helped our clients to reduce the time to action on insider threats because it can be integrated."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's responses are faster. Its installation is also reliable. The security score helps with the security part."

"The solution is very stable and extremely reliable."

"We have reduced sensitive data leakage incidents by 50 to 60 percent, which has lowered compliance and breach-related risks significantly."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention's ability to prevent unauthorized sharing of sensitive information is valuable."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention pros

Cons

"It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent."

"The tool should include better AI features."

"The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements."

"The performance could be better."

"The solution’s performance must be improved."

"To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones."

"The product needs to improve its support so that users can just log in and create tickets as opposed to sending emails. Sending emails is difficult to track. It also needs to work on its analytics platform."

"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well."

"There is a lot of ambiguity when you are setting up labels, such as sensitive information labels."

"All the security operations are better defined in Forcepoint, while in Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, you will have to use a specific workflow and then an application to release blocked emails."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention can be improved as the endpoint DLP policy tuning can be complex in large environments, especially when balancing security with user productivity."

"We faced a performance issue with the tool when we didn't get alerts for file uploads."

"The tool's user interface and document fingerprinting have been very poor for my customers because uploading files manually can be problematic."

"Technical support is awful."

"Because it's an academic institution, we got really excited about the level of granularity we could implement, but that granularity overwhelmed our users."

"I see that there's a lot of content in Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, and when I click on it and look around, I wonder what certain features do, but there's not enough documentation and explanation."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool has a fair price."

"Its price is very reasonable and competitive."

"They offer a lot of features in a single bundle. So, if you want to remove some features from GTB, you can remove those. You don't need to buy those, and the price will reduce accordingly. I am very happy with the pricing."

"When comparing GTB Technologies Inspector to other solutions you receive a good value for your money when considering all the features and benefits."

"The tool is not expensive."

"The tool's pricing is affordable and based on the number of endpoints."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"It's a little bit pricey compared to competitors, but it's not too high."

"The cost works out to about $15 per user per month."

"If one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the price as one out of ten."

"I am satisfied with the tool's pricing."

"The product has the best price-to-performance ratio."

"You get the solution in a bundle if you get the E5 suite."

"Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is part of a bundle and is not sold as a standalone product."

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?

The pricing for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention was manageable for us because we already had Microsoft 365 and Purview-related licensing, but advanced DLP and insider risk features became ex...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention can be improved as the endpoint DLP policy tuning can be complex in large environments, especially when balancing security with user productivity. False posit...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention?

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is used for monitoring and preventing sensitive data exfiltration across Exchange Online, Teams, SharePoint, OneDrive, and endpoints. From a SOC's perspective...

See all answers

Comparisons

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 14% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 13% of the time

Trellix DLP vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 6% of the time

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 6% of the time

Proofpoint Email Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs GTB Technologies Inspector

Compared 4% of the time

More GTB Technologies Inspector Competitors

Amazon Macie vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

September 2026

Download GTB Technologies Inspector product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

September 2026

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention report

Download Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

Inspector, GTB Technologies DLP

Microsoft Endpoint Data Loss Prevention, MS Endpoint DLP, Microsoft Endpoint DLP

Overview

GTB Technologies Inspector offers a single agent solution for data loss prevention and classification, supporting multiple platforms. Users find it lightweight and effective for real-time protection and encryption, making it suitable for managing sensitive data and preventing data leakage.

GTB Technologies Inspector integrates data classification and leakage prevention in a unified platform, functioning as a Cloud Access Security Broker and firewall. Supporting platforms like Google Cloud and Azure, it monitors sensitive data between departments and third parties, protecting confidential documents and Microsoft 365 from network and endpoint threats. Its centralized console facilitates deployment and monitoring across networks and endpoints. While recognized for its ease of deployment and real-time protection, improvements in processing time, performance, analytics, and support processes are desired. Users seek enhanced information rights management, AI capabilities, and mobile endpoint security with better database security and functionality.

What are the key features?

Single Agent: Integrates DLP and data classification into one solution.
OCR: Offers optical character recognition without extra licensing fees.
Fingerprinting: Includes data fingerprinting for preemptive protection.
Real-Time Protection: Encrypts and decrypts data instantaneously.
Centralized Console: Manages deployments and settings from one location.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Effective Management: Ensures efficient handling of sensitive data across platforms.
Ease of Deployment: Simplifies setup and integration processes.
Customization Options: Adapts to industry-specific needs and changes.
Network and Endpoint Protection: Offers robust security for multiple environments.

In industries like finance and healthcare, GTB Technologies Inspector addresses unique data security concerns, facilitating data classification and regulatory compliance. It efficiently manages cloud access and enforces security policies, safeguarding data shared with third parties. As organizations expand digitally, it provides essential leakage prevention mechanisms, maintaining data integrity without compromising operational efficiency.

GTB Technologies

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention helps businesses protect sensitive data through robust compliance automation and seamless multi-platform integration, supporting environments like Office 365, Azure, iOS, Android, and macOS.

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention focuses on identifying sensitive data and maintaining compliance through automation and integration with platforms such as Exchange email, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams. Auto-labeling, classification controls, and monitoring capabilities ensure secure data management, reducing insider threat response times by 25%. While praised for its capabilities, improvements in system integration, endpoint handling, and incident management are needed. Licensing costs and limited language support pose challenges. Usability can be enhanced through interface updates and better documentation. OCR and scalability enhancements could improve policy propagation speed. More end-user training examples would be beneficial.

What are the key features?

Sensitive Data Identification: Detects confidential information across environments.
Compliance Automation: Streamlines regulatory requirements adherence.
Multi-Platform Integration: Supports Office 365, Azure, iOS, Android, macOS seamlessly.
Auto-Labeling: Automatically categorizes sensitive data for protection.
Classification Controls: Provides robust data classification options.
Alerts and Monitoring: Enhances data security with proactive alerting.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Efficient Threat Response: Reduces insider threat response times by 25%.
Enhanced Data Governance: Simplifies managing data privacy and compliance.
Comprehensive Protection: Integrates with multiple platforms for wide coverage.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and legal, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is crucial for safeguarding sensitive information due to strict compliance demands. It automates data classification and policy configurations, preventing accidental data leakage and ensuring security protocols align with regulatory standards.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Supya Security Software

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

September 2026

Free Report: GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GTB Technologies Inspector vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.