Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Gemini AI vs Reword comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 9, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Gemini AI
Ranking in AI Writing Tools
1st
Ranking in AI Proofreading Tools
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
AI Code Assistants (3rd), Large Language Models (LLMs) (1st)
Reword
Ranking in AI Writing Tools
12th
Ranking in AI Proofreading Tools
14th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the AI Writing Tools category, the mindshare of Google Gemini AI is 17.9%, down from 27.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Reword is 1.4%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Writing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Google Gemini AI17.9%
Reword1.4%
Other80.7%
AI Writing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Luís Silva - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Technical Lead at a consultancy with 201-500 employees
Tool proves competitive with cost-effectiveness and speed while benefiting decision-making and integration capabilities, but shows room for enhancing creativity and handling large data contextually
There is another benefit in that Google Gemini is highly competitive from a cost perspective. The cost per token is very competitive. It's not the best - the Chinese models such as DeepSeek are better, but I can't use them. From a cost perspective, between European and United States options, Google Gemini is very competitive. It's not only its cost, it's also very performing. The time it takes to process the prompts and context information is very fast. It's one of the fastest models in the market. That's another advantage. There are other models which are also very good in quality but not as fast, such as Anthropic Claude. Google Gemini currently has a very good balance. The AI capabilities of Google Gemini are a multi-modal LLM which allows me to pass documents, images, and texts in the same prompt. Being multi-modal makes my life easier. I don't have to translate information before I can work with it. Google provides free tools to test scenarios, which speeds up development and reduces costs. It's a very fast and accurate model with quality responses.
Use Reword?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Writing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
University
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise5
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Gemini?
The pricing of Google Gemini AI is not well understood, so no feedback can be provided on the cost. It was thought to have come together with the device subscription.
What needs improvement with Google Gemini?
Google Gemini AI is not used much because it does not appear to be as responsive or as effective as Alexa when responding to questions, queries, instructions, or commands. When in a room with Googl...
What is your primary use case for Google Gemini?
Google Gemini AI is used for common, basic digital assistant queries such as asking about the weather and the time. Often there are conflicting responses from Google Home, Google Home Mini, and the...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Google Bard
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, OpenAI, Grammarly and others in AI Writing Tools. Updated: December 2025.
879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.