Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cursor vs Google Gemini AI comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cursor
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
3rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Google Gemini AI
Ranking in AI Code Assistants
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
AI Writing Tools (1st), Large Language Models (LLMs) (1st), AI Proofreading Tools (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

Luís Silva - PeerSpot reviewer
Tool proves competitive with cost-effectiveness and speed while benefiting decision-making and integration capabilities, but shows room for enhancing creativity and handling large data contextually
There is another benefit in that Google Gemini is highly competitive from a cost perspective. The cost per token is very competitive. It's not the best - the Chinese models such as DeepSeek are better, but I can't use them. From a cost perspective, between European and United States options, Google Gemini is very competitive. It's not only its cost, it's also very performing. The time it takes to process the prompts and context information is very fast. It's one of the fastest models in the market. That's another advantage. There are other models which are also very good in quality but not as fast, such as Anthropic Claude. Google Gemini currently has a very good balance. The AI capabilities of Google Gemini are a multi-modal LLM which allows me to pass documents, images, and texts in the same prompt. Being multi-modal makes my life easier. I don't have to translate information before I can work with it. Google provides free tools to test scenarios, which speeds up development and reduces costs. It's a very fast and accurate model with quality responses.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Code Assistants solutions are best for your needs.
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
12%
University
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
University
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Gemini?
If ten is expensive and one is free, I would rate it a three or four.
What needs improvement with Google Gemini?
I was thinking that now it is creating advanced images. In the same way, we could get video versions easily so it would be very helpful for people interested in video editing. If we give the scenar...
What is your primary use case for Google Gemini?
I have used that recently to create test cases for my scenarios. I have prompt engineering skills, so it is easy for me to get the right response which I use in my project. I have used it for creat...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Google Bard
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub, Google, Cursor and others in AI Code Assistants. Updated: July 2025.
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.