Google Cloud Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP comparison

Google and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Storage category. Google is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8, while NetApp is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.0. Google holds a 8.5% mindshare in CS, compared to NetApp’s 12.5% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Storage

Read 78 Google Cloud Storage reviews

1,589 Views
615 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 62 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

2,300 Views
555 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Storage

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Google Cloud Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP compete in cloud storage and data management solutions. Users generally prefer the pricing and support of Google Cloud Storage, but NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP's advanced features make it a strong contender.

Features: Google Cloud Storage offers scalable storage solutions, seamless integration with other Google services, and robust security measures. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP provides comprehensive data management tools such as SnapMirror, FlexClone, and advanced data protection capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Storage requires enhancements in data migration tools, improved support for legacy systems, and better user documentation. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP needs a more intuitive management interface, enhanced integration with non-NetApp environments, and streamlined setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage is praised for straightforward deployment and seamless integration with Google's ecosystem. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP handles complex deployments but has a steeper learning curve. Both offer highly rated customer service, with Google Cloud having an edge in initial setup and integration.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage features competitive pricing, especially for long-term storage, and offers good ROI due to its scalability and lower maintenance costs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP has higher pricing reflecting its advanced features and data management capabilities, offering solid ROI for enterprises with complex data needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage

Ranking in Cloud Storage

1st

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Cloud Storage

2nd

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Backup (14th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Storage category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Storage is 8.5%, down from 11.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 12.5%, down from 14.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Storage

Featured Reviews

Manimaran Tannimalai

Managing Partner at Cloud Analytics Sdn Bhd

User interface consistency facilitates seamless project planning and design for specialized tasks

While Google has made efforts to address SAP loads, the company lacks a product specialist focus. They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain niches. Google's strength lies in their adapted approach to specific tasks, as seen with SAP loads. Generally, their focus is widespread.

Read full review

Pramod-Talekar

Sr Service Engineer at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution

The tool's most valuable features are the SnapLock and SnapMirror features. If something goes wrong with the data, we can restore it. This isn't a mirror; we store data in different locations. If there's an issue on the primary site, we can retrieve data from the secondary site. Multiprotocol support in NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is beneficial because it allows customers to manage SAN and NAS data within a single storage solution. This feature eliminates the need to purchase different types of storage.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Some of the most valuable features are how convenient and easy to use this solution is. It's very user-friendly and meets all my requirements."

"On the phone, I appreciate how seamless it is."

"What I like most about Google Cloud Storage is that it's very stable, very quick, and very useful."

"The best feature is ease of use."

"One of the most valuable features of the solution is its ease of use."

"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage is its ease of use. It fits well with our business use."

"The solution operates in the background and it is attached to my Gmail account. When I download files to my phone, such as pictures, they automatically go to Google Cloud Storage."

"The solution is already stable and I have not encountered problems in this regard."

More Google Cloud Storage pros

"The solution’s Snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are the best thing since sliced bread. Rollback is super easy. It's just simple, and it works. It's very efficient."

"Its functionality and technical support are adequate to help prevent failure due to errors."

"If you have a larger amount of data than normal in cloud, it is easy to provision and maintain. Waiting for the delivery of the controller, the configuration of enclosures, etc., all this stuff is eliminated compared to using on-premise."

"It gives a solution for storage one place to go across everything. So, the customer is very familiar with NetApp on-prem. It allows them to gain access to the file piece. It helps them with the training aspect of it, so they don't have to relearn something new. They already know this product. They just have to learn some widgets or what it's like in the cloud to operate and deploy it in different ways."

"This solution has helped us because it is easy to use."

"Lastly, the API and web services are fairly good. That is an important feature too. We write some code to do different things. We have code that runs to make sure that everything is being backed up as we say it is and we try to also detect places where we may have missed a backup."

"ONTAP has been very stable for us, specifically in the cloud environment. It allows us to have high availability as well as standalone systems if that's what we want within our specific workloads. Also, on-premise has been a very stable environment. We have very few outages and when we do, we work with support to get systems back online in a timely manner."

"The most valuable features are that it's reliable, simple, and performs well."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

Cons

"The user experience needs to be simplified."

"The product's user interface is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Pricing remains challenging, especially for SMEs, making cloud services costlier than on-premises solutions."

"The solution must provide some accessibility features."

"The problem I face right now is that my data warehouse is being hosted on Google Cloud, however, integration between Google Cloud to Microsoft Azure is a big problem."

"Its security should be better from the data security point of view. It should be more secure, and it should get tightly integrated with products such as Google Docs and Google Sheets. Microsoft covers different kinds of tools such as Microsoft Office, Microsoft Word, and Microsoft Excel."

"It would be better to assign storage usage to different categories, because storage capacity is cumulative, if your Google album and email are both full, you will be unable to send or receive email."

"What would make Google Cloud Storage better is if it provided more storage."

More Google Cloud Storage cons

"I would like to see more aggressive management of the aggregate space. On the Cloud Volumes ONTAP that we use for offsite backup copies, most of the data sits in S3. There are also the EBS volumes on the Cloud Volumes ONTAP itself. Sometimes what happens is that the aggregate size just stays the same. If it allocates 8 terabytes initially, it just stays at 8 terabytes for a long time, even though we're only using 20 percent of that 8 terabytes. NetApp could undersize that more aggressively."

"The encryption and deduplication features still have a lot of room for improvement."

"The cost needs improvement."

"If they could include clustering together multiple physical Cloud Volumes ONTAP devices as an option, that could be helpful."

"There is room for improvement in tier one support, especially with potential language barriers and communication challenges."

"Not a perfect ten because it's not very efficient with upgrades and management."

"The dashboard is a little bit clunky. I like to see it a little bit more on the simplistic side. I would like to be able to create my own widgets and customize what I want to see a little bit more versus what is currently there. That would be helpful so that when I log in, I go straight to my widget or my board without going to multiple places to get to what I need to find or build."

"I would like to see more information about Cloud Volumes ONTAP using Google Cloud Platform on NetApp's website."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is fine."

"If you're ready to pay, they're ready to give you as much storage as you want. Considering the features that Google Cloud Storage provides, the pricing is reasonable. So far, I'm still using the free service from them because I'm able to meet my requirements with the free subscription. Maybe, in the future, if a storage requirement comes, I'll pay for it or go for the license."

"The product pricing is reasonable."

"I am paying a yearly subscription fee."

"The price could be cheaper."

"The price of Google Cloud Storage is reasonable when compared to other similar solutions."

"They have recently changed their pricing structures, it used to be free but now it is a paid service. However, I am on a monthly subscription and the price is reasonable."

"We do not have to pay for a license for Google Cloud Storage but there is a subscription that needs to be paid."

More Google Cloud Storage pricing and cost advice

"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was good, but it was a test system, not a real purchase."

"They allow a special price if you are working closely with them. Since we have a lot of NetApp systems, we got some kind of discount. That's something they do for other customers, not just for us. The price was fair. In addition to the licensing fees, you're paying Amazon for your usage..."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable."

"The standard pricing is online. Pricing depends. If you're using the PayGo model, then it's just the normal costs on the Microsoft page. If you're using Bring Your Own License, which is what we're doing, then you get with your sales contact at NetApp and start figuring out what price is the best, in the end, for your company."

"The deal with the seller was acceptable; the pricing is reasonable."

"Once we deploy the pay as you go model, we cannot convert this product as a BYOL model. This is a concern that we have."

"Overall, the pricing of NetApp is aggressive and the pricing becomes more aggressive as the amount of data increases. The cost for a given volume of data that you are storing becomes lower. The greater the volume of data, the cheaper the license."

"Our licensing is based on a yearly subscription. That is an additional cost, but because of the storage efficiencies that the NetApp gives, even with the additional cost of the NetApp license, you still end up saving money versus straight Azure native for storage. It's definitely worth it."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

59%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

36%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Storage?

It is flexible and simple to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage?

Google Cloud ( /products/google-cloud-reviews ) was cheaper compared to AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) and Azure ( /products/microsoft-azure-reviews ). AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) wa...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage?

See all answers

What do you like most about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

So a lot of these licenses are at the rate that is required for capacity. So they're they're able to reduce the license consumption and also the consumption of the underlying cloud storage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

The solution's pricing is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp's support could improve.

See all answers

Comparisons

AT&T Cloud Storage vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 20% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Google Cloud Storage

Compared 3% of the time

More Google Cloud Storage Competitors

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 18% of the time

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 13% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 3% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage

June 2025

Download Google Cloud Storage product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

May 2025

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Also Known As

No data available

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

Overview

Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.

Google

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

May 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Storage vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP report.

See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors and best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.