Google Cloud Storage and Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) compete in cloud storage solutions. Amazon EFS is considered superior due to its advanced features, despite higher costs.
Features: Google Cloud Storage offers high durability, scalability, and seamless integration with other Google services, providing extensive connectivity and data integrity. Amazon EFS provides automatic scaling, easy deployment with AWS services, and high performance for large-scale applications.
Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Storage requires better support documentation and clearer pricing structures. Amazon EFS needs improved performance in multi-region deployments and simpler initial setup procedures.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Storage offers a straightforward deployment process and reliable customer support. Amazon EFS, though more complex in deployment, benefits from high-quality AWS customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Storage features competitive pricing models and positive ROI due to cost-effective storage solutions. Amazon EFS justifies its higher setup costs with significant scalability and performance benefits, delivering substantial ROI for large-scale applications.
While the time to respond was good, the time to resolve was not optimal, as it took more than a week.
Amazon's support model is consistent across services.
Training and support depend on the plan you have, with centralized support being very helpful in case issues arise.
We have self-studied to learn the services.
For SAP loads, Google provided a specific team, which resulted in good support.
Its auto-scaling feature is a crucial point, providing high scalability that I would rate at ten out of ten.
Elastic File Systems allow me to scale up or down easily.
It is very cost-effective, and there's no need for initial charges.
Google Cloud Storage is scalable, but there are limitations.
Amazon EFS is extremely stable, as it is managed by AWS.
While I experienced an EFS mount dropping, it was related to server issues rather than EFS itself.
There was no direct experience with any instability during my involvement.
Enabling AI-driven or automatic features would be beneficial for new or nontechnical users.
In my project, there are challenges related to AWS, such as ensuring proper security measures with IMS code and encryption.
They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain niches.
EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage.
Amazon EFS is more costly compared to other storage options available from AWS.
Elastic File Systems can be expensive due to the nature of data transfer costs.
Google Cloud was cheaper compared to AWS and Azure.
Depending on your setup, Google Cloud Storage is economical, especially if you do not need high stability and scalability.
Its ease of integration with other AWS services enhances our infrastructure, while the shared storage access improves reliability and processing continuity for our applications.
They help me process data while maintaining low latency, which is crucial for efficient data processing.
It provides extra throughput and IOPS, allowing us to configure it according to the MDA.
The user interface of Google Cloud Storage is easy and consistent across all their products.
We do not experience any disruptions, and the service meets our needs and requirements.
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.
When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file system provides a standard file system interface and file system access semantics, allowing you to seamlessly integrate Amazon EFS with your existing applications and tools. Multiple Amazon EC2 instances can access an Amazon EFS file system at the same time, allowing Amazon EFS to provide a common data source for workloads and applications running on more than one Amazon EC2 instance.
It’s designed for high availability and durability, and provides performance for a broad spectrum of workloads and applications, including Big Data and analytics, media processing workflows, content management, web serving, and home directories.
Google Cloud Storage is praised for its fast performance, seamless integration, high security, and scalability. Users store and access large amounts of data easily, backup files, host websites, and collaborate on projects. The platform's reliability and cost-effectiveness make it a top choice for data storage and management.
We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
