No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer comparison

Why PeerSpot?
Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7, while Oracle is ranked #13 with an average rating of 6.5. Microsoft holds a 3.9% mindshare in DS, compared to Oracle’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Read 26 Azure Database for PostgreSQL reviews
  • 7,002 Views
  • 4,131 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...
Read 7 Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer reviews
  • 1,656 Views
  • 1,639 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer and Azure Database for PostgreSQL compete in the database solutions category, each offering unique advantages. Azure Database for PostgreSQL appears to have the upper hand in terms of scalability, cost-effectiveness, and integration within the Azure ecosystem, making it attractive for businesses seeking a flexible and managed service.

Features: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is tailored for high-performance Oracle database environments, featuring advanced data security, large-scale application support, and excellent Oracle workload optimization. Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers notable scalability, seamless integration with Azure services, and straightforward use of open-source PostgreSQL, combined with comprehensive monitoring and observing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer could enhance its user experience by improving encryption capabilities and simplifying deployment expertise requirements. Azure Database for PostgreSQL could benefit from reduced costs for cloud execution, clearer version upgrade processes, and more comprehensive control over database configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer requires specialized expertise due to its sophisticated systems, though Oracle-specific support is strong. Azure Database for PostgreSQL excels with streamlined deployment and integration within Azure's infrastructure, benefiting from comprehensive Azure support services, providing ease for users seeking cloud-native solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer involves significant initial costs due to its specialized hardware, yet enterprises focused on Oracle-specific optimizations may find the ROI satisfactory. Azure Database for PostgreSQL presents a budget-friendly setup with flexible pricing models, offering better ROI for businesses favoring cost-effective and efficient cloud-native database solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Report (Updated: September 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
September 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
4th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (4th)
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
13th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
4.9
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Azure Database for PostgreSQL is 3.9%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is 3.3%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database as a Service (DBaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Azure Database for PostgreSQL3.9%
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer3.3%
Other92.8%
Database as a Service (DBaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Sathish Palanisamy - PeerSpot reviewer
Sathish Palanisamy
Staff Data Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Improves database performance, supports AI integration, and accelerates customer-focused innovation
Azure Database for PostgreSQL can be improved in the area of elastic capabilities. One of the things we were actively looking for is the elastic feature, which was made a GA at this Ignite event. I am really happy that finally in Azure, we have a product which we can use for elastic clusters. If you are bound with a single server, then you have a vertical limit. Now you do not have any limits. As long as your use case grows, we can grow. The only thing I would maybe be thinking about is we should also allow customers to pick different node sizes for every node inside the elastic eventually. Some nodes do not need that big capacity. So that may be a nice-to-have feature, though it is not a must-have at this point.
Read full review
WB
WALID BOUHAJJA
Oracle DBS at Bpifrance
Positive experience with virtual cloud network creation and database migration highlights patching challenges
The best feature of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that it can be managed without needing only DBAs. We have many features, including the observability feature that helps check performance and generates numerous reports about performance. We have also implemented APIs, enabling us to create and perform many operations. This means we need DBAs who can work with APIs. We are autonomous in the patching process and don't need Oracle for patching. If you configure the process of patching, it will be executed automatically. We are using dynamic scaling which is implemented on an external virtual machine, helping us to downscale or upscale the CPU. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer has supported our organization's compliance and data sovereignty without problems. I have observed some limitations. For example, regarding encryption, though it is mandatory for Exadata Cloud at Customer, we cannot encrypt the database with external keys. Currently, with Exadata Cloud at Customer, using external keys is not possible.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Automatic patching and backups have a huge impact on my database management strategy—we have an operations team of two people and do not have time to handle database maintenance manually, so we chose platform-as-a-service for this reason."
"With PostgreSQL, the documentation is perfect, and using it on Microsoft is easy because there is documentation for Microsoft PostgreSQL, which I find easy to follow."
"Postgres has helped us innovate and stay competitive."
"I rate Azure Database for PostgreSQL 10 out of 10."
"Compared to my previous expenses for maintaining an on-premise PostgreSQL database, Azure Database for PostgreSQL is far easier, far simpler, and far cheaper in my opinion."
"Azure Database for PostgreSQL is hugely discounted and cost-effective compared to the previous expenses for maintaining an on-premises PostgreSQL database."
"We transact 128 trillion data per month using Azure Database for PostgreSQL, which helps us to be more successful on every transaction that the customer is requesting from us."
"The operational efficiency of Azure Database for PostgreSQL is good."
More Azure Database for PostgreSQL pros
"The operation model is the most valuable feature."
"Performance has significantly improved."
"The best feature of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that it can be managed without needing only DBAs, with observability features to check performance, generate reports, and implement APIs for creating and performing many operations."
"The most valuable feature is that it is based on Exadata infrastructure, which is Oracle 's leading engineered system that is trusted, fault-tolerant, and has unique performance features."
"I am particularly fond of the intelligent capabilities that enhance the backend, utilizing technology to analyze SQL queries."
"Exporting and importing is easy because of its cleanliness, making the process easier. However, setting up the Data Guard was more difficult. Despite this, the client experienced lower downtime."
"We have migrated mission-critical databases to Exadata and gained significant performance in our OLTP and Batch jobs."
"I like that Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is a stable, well-positioned product in the market today, and it's very scalable."
 

Cons

"There aren't any notable areas for improvement that I could see. PostgreSQL was self-sufficient with no need for additional database knowledge to maintain it."
"My impressions of the latency and availability of Azure Database for PostgreSQL is that it is a concern that arises post-migration."
"Currently, most databases will try to use all the CPUs available and use all the memories available. We try to give all the databases one hundred percent of the hardware capacity, but sometimes because the OS layer itself will need some resources."
"Azure Database for PostgreSQL has not really helped reduce infrastructure costs at my company."
"Occasionally, we experience throughput issues due to bandwidth limitations of client setups with Azure, which have limited connections, but as far as the service itself goes, it has been rock solid."
"I do not know how Azure Database for PostgreSQL can be improved or what additional features I would prefer to see. There may be some pain points that would be valuable to fix."
"In the future, I would like to see anomaly detection."
"They can offer more RAG extensions. Currently, it only has the vector search. It does not presently support knowledge graph functionalities as Neo4j does. It also does not offer some tools to improve indexing the way other vector databases offer."
More Azure Database for PostgreSQL cons
"For the data migration, we used ZDM. It was not integrated with the databases, and the documentation lacks clarity."
"We had some problems in the developer's environment. We had some problems with the initial installation environment."
"The solution is expensive."
"Today their support no longer lives up to my expectation."
"As a customer, you can't see the boot messages of your virtualized guest machines."
"Scalability is not straightforward."
"A room for improvement in Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that they need to train more partners to gain more knowledge because currently, they are keeping a lot to themselves. For example, they are still keeping a lot of information on their campus, so information sharing is limited."
"Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is stable, but the only problem occurs during OS patching. If you encounter issues, the VMC (virtual machine cluster) becomes unusable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There aren't any notable areas for improvement that I could see. PostgreSQL was self-sufficient with no need for additional database knowledge to maintain it."
"The pay-as-you-go pricing model plays a critical role in managing database-related costs and resource allocation. We build using Infrastructure as Code (IAC) and maintain a focus on FinOps to control Azure service costs. Some clients are pushy on price. It's critical to automate it, so we're just using it when appropriate and switching it off in certain scenarios."
"The pricing experience is positive. Azure Database for PostgreSQL reduces the need for hardware investments, and the pay-as-you-go pricing model positively affects database-related costs by allowing us to start small and scale as needed."
"We do not pay for a full-year subscription because our usage is still at the beginning phase and not much. The pay-as-you-go model works well for us."
"The price is too much."
"The machine and the cloud model itself already have licensing advantages."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
Financial Services Firm
30%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
10%
Educational Organization
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise16
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Database for PostgreSQL?
Azure Database for PostgreSQL's pay-as-you-go pricing model has affected my database-related cost and resource allocation. I do not know the exact minute details of the database cost. For even mino...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Azure Database for PostgreSQL?
Apart from the scaling aspect, I would like to see improvements in the user interface. If a guided journey could be created, I would prefer that approach. Some cloud platforms I've used have journe...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Azure Database for PostgreSQL?
Azure Database for PostgreSQL serves several use cases for me. I use it primarily for testing and development environments where I need flexible database access without long-term commitments.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?
The pricing is reasonable due to a universal agreement, which often positions Oracle solutions better against others. I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?
In future updates for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer, I would like to see another feature for the different costs for the non-CDB models, because if you are not using the non-CDB models, you have...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?
The use cases for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer are based on our actual solution. We have the Exadata, but it has reached its end of life. The X5 has attained the end of life, so we discussed mi...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Compared 14% of the time
Amazon RDS vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
Amazon RDS vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Compared 12% of the time
MySQL vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
MySQL vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Compared 10% of the time
PostgreSQL vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
PostgreSQL vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Compared 7% of the time
MongoDB Atlas vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
MongoDB Atlas vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Compared 7% of the time
More Azure Database for PostgreSQL Competitors
Amazon RDS vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Logo
Amazon RDS vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
Compared 24% of the time
MongoDB Atlas vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Logo
MongoDB Atlas vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
Compared 14% of the time
Oracle Database as a Service vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Logo
Oracle Database as a Service vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
Compared 13% of the time
Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Logo
Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
Compared 10% of the time
vCloud Air vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Logo
vCloud Air vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
Compared 2% of the time
More Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Azure Database for PostgreSQL
September 2026
Azure Database for PostgreSQL reportDownload Azure Database for PostgreSQL product report
Buyer's Guide
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
September 2026
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer reportDownload Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer product report
 

Overview

Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers efficient management, robust networking, and seamless Microsoft integration. Known for its strong performance and high satisfaction in enterprise settings, it provides operational efficiency, security, and monitoring.

With features that facilitate Azure integration, easy configuration, and AI integration, Azure Database for PostgreSQL serves as a valuable choice for businesses requiring operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Users benefit from powerful vector capabilities, seamless Microsoft service integration, straightforward management, and user authentication ensuring high satisfaction. Easy optimization, query analysis, and backup operations make it suitable for varied enterprise applications. However, improvements in flexible scaling, cost-effectiveness of monitoring tools, and enhanced integration with Azure OpenAI would enhance its capabilities further.

What Are the Key Features of Azure Database for PostgreSQL?
  • Robust Networking: Offers seamless Azure integration to optimize cloud resources.
  • AI Integration: Simplifies incorporating artificial intelligence into databases.
  • Monitoring Tools: Provides comprehensive tools for efficient database management.
  • Security: Ensures user data is protected with high-standard security protocols.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Delivers efficient operations with budget-friendly solutions.
What Benefits Should Users Consider?
  • Operational Efficiency: Streamlines database management tasks, reducing workload.
  • High Satisfaction: Receives positive feedback for its reliable performance in enterprises.
  • Enterprise Compatibility: Integrates across various Microsoft services for enhanced productivity.
  • User-Friendly Management: Facilitates straightforward database administration.
  • Scalability: Supports businesses with potential growth through flexible solutions.

Industries such as healthcare, retail, and finance leverage Azure Database for PostgreSQL for backend solutions, incident reporting, and public information sharing. Managed service providers utilize its strong performance for client needs, while administrators use it for applications like ControlM. Its flexibility supports containerized applications and disaster recovery, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments.

Microsoft

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer optimizes backend performance and SQL query analysis. It offers scalable and observable infrastructure, ensuring reliable virtualization and licensing solutions tailored for on-premises management.

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer bridges the gap between cloud capabilities and on-premises control, providing enhanced performance, security, and cost efficiency for managing critical data. Users enjoy Oracle-managed virtualization and support services while maintaining data sovereignty and compliance. Despite needing improvements in scalability and documentation, it remains a preferred choice for large databases requiring robust infrastructure.

What are the key features of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?
  • Enhanced Performance: Optimizes SQL query analysis and backend capabilities.
  • Scalability & Observability: Dynamic scaling with extensive management tools.
  • Autonomous Patching: Simplifies maintenance with automated updates.
  • Oracle-managed Virtualization: Offers trusted and secure virtualization solutions.
  • Fault Tolerance: Ensures reliable infrastructure with advanced engineering.
What benefits should users consider when evaluating Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?
  • Cost Efficiency: Effective resource management compared to alternatives.
  • On-premises Control: Enables high-level control over critical data.
  • Security & Compliance: Supports data sovereignty with compliance features.
  • Performance Reliability: Delivers consistent high performance.

Financial institutions utilize Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer for migrating large databases while maintaining precise on-premises control. It provides a high-performance, secure solution compared to alternatives like AWS, enabling successful cross-platform migrations and efficient data management within data centers.

Oracle
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
IBVI, illycaffe, Scottish Water, trueblue, AirAsia, droptank
Buyer's Guide
Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
September 2026
Free Report: Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer report.
See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.