Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8, while Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.7. Microsoft holds a 3.3% mindshare in DS, compared to Oracle’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Read 23 Azure Database for PostgreSQL reviews
  • 3,286 Views
  • 1,939 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...
Read 7 Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer reviews
  • 1,044 Views
  • 1,044 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer and Azure Database for PostgreSQL compete in the database solutions category, each offering unique advantages. Azure Database for PostgreSQL appears to have the upper hand in terms of scalability, cost-effectiveness, and integration within the Azure ecosystem, making it attractive for businesses seeking a flexible and managed service.

Features: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is tailored for high-performance Oracle database environments, featuring advanced data security, large-scale application support, and excellent Oracle workload optimization. Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers notable scalability, seamless integration with Azure services, and straightforward use of open-source PostgreSQL, combined with comprehensive monitoring and observing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer could enhance its user experience by improving encryption capabilities and simplifying deployment expertise requirements. Azure Database for PostgreSQL could benefit from reduced costs for cloud execution, clearer version upgrade processes, and more comprehensive control over database configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer requires specialized expertise due to its sophisticated systems, though Oracle-specific support is strong. Azure Database for PostgreSQL excels with streamlined deployment and integration within Azure's infrastructure, benefiting from comprehensive Azure support services, providing ease for users seeking cloud-native solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer involves significant initial costs due to its specialized hardware, yet enterprises focused on Oracle-specific optimizations may find the ROI satisfactory. Azure Database for PostgreSQL presents a budget-friendly setup with flexible pricing models, offering better ROI for businesses favoring cost-effective and efficient cloud-native database solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (5th)
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...
Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
4.9
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Azure Database for PostgreSQL is 3.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is 3.9%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Database as a Service (DBaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Azure Database for PostgreSQL3.3%
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer3.9%
Other92.8%
Database as a Service (DBaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Sathish Palanisamy - PeerSpot reviewer
Sathish Palanisamy
Staff Data Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Improves database performance, supports AI integration, and accelerates customer-focused innovation
Azure Database for PostgreSQL can be improved in the area of elastic capabilities. One of the things we were actively looking for is the elastic feature, which was made a GA at this Ignite event. I am really happy that finally in Azure, we have a product which we can use for elastic clusters. If you are bound with a single server, then you have a vertical limit. Now you do not have any limits. As long as your use case grows, we can grow. The only thing I would maybe be thinking about is we should also allow customers to pick different node sizes for every node inside the elastic eventually. Some nodes do not need that big capacity. So that may be a nice-to-have feature, though it is not a must-have at this point.
Read full review
WB
WALID BOUHAJJA
Oracle DBS at Bpifrance
Positive experience with virtual cloud network creation and database migration highlights patching challenges
The best feature of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that it can be managed without needing only DBAs. We have many features, including the observability feature that helps check performance and generates numerous reports about performance. We have also implemented APIs, enabling us to create and perform many operations. This means we need DBAs who can work with APIs. We are autonomous in the patching process and don't need Oracle for patching. If you configure the process of patching, it will be executed automatically. We are using dynamic scaling which is implemented on an external virtual machine, helping us to downscale or upscale the CPU. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer has supported our organization's compliance and data sovereignty without problems. I have observed some limitations. For example, regarding encryption, though it is mandatory for Exadata Cloud at Customer, we cannot encrypt the database with external keys. Currently, with Exadata Cloud at Customer, using external keys is not possible.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I appreciate most about Azure Database for PostgreSQL is not one particular feature; I think it is the use case and the facility to have a single pane of glass for managing what is on the edge, what is on the cloud, especially now with Azure Local as well."
"The performance of our RAG application is very good. We have 96% satisfaction."
"With PostgreSQL, the documentation is perfect, and using it on Microsoft is easy because there is documentation for Microsoft PostgreSQL, which I find easy to follow."
"Horizontal scaling has helped manage our workloads, making it easier for us to stay cost-efficient while also scaling when we get more traffic on our application."
"Compared to my previous expenses for maintaining an on-premise PostgreSQL database, Azure Database for PostgreSQL is far easier, far simpler, and far cheaper in my opinion."
"Postgres has helped us innovate and stay competitive."
"Azure Database has become easier to use over time."
"In terms of integration, we already have SharePoint online, and we're starting to explore PowerApps and PowerFlow. It's all seamless. The ease of integrating SQL and licensing purposes plays a significant role, making it a comfortable choice for the organization."
More Azure Database for PostgreSQL pros
"Exporting and importing is easy because of its cleanliness, making the process easier. However, setting up the Data Guard was more difficult. Despite this, the client experienced lower downtime."
"The best feature of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that it can be managed without needing only DBAs, with observability features to check performance, generate reports, and implement APIs for creating and performing many operations."
"The operation model is the most valuable feature."
"Performance has significantly improved."
"The most valuable feature is that it is based on Exadata infrastructure, which is Oracle 's leading engineered system that is trusted, fault-tolerant, and has unique performance features."
"I am particularly fond of the intelligent capabilities that enhance the backend, utilizing technology to analyze SQL queries."
"I like that Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is a stable, well-positioned product in the market today, and it's very scalable."
 

Cons

"They can offer more RAG extensions. Currently, it only has the vector search."
"We would love to definitely see scalability. We would love to see it grow as more people use it and it can handle the data and maybe tell us some optimizations by reporting on what we have."
"My impressions of the latency and availability of Azure Database for PostgreSQL is that it is a concern that arises post-migration."
"I do not know how Azure Database for PostgreSQL can be improved or what additional features I would prefer to see. There may be some pain points that would be valuable to fix."
"Support at best is a five out of ten."
"The critical service is the Azure OpenAI service. It would help to make it simpler and easier to integrate with that or cognitive services."
"Azure Database for PostgreSQL has not helped reduce infrastructure costs for me or my clients."
"There is a stability issue where, if the database usage peaks quickly, it may crash and require intervention to restore functionality. It does not auto-heal or self-heal in such situations."
More Azure Database for PostgreSQL cons
"A room for improvement in Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that they need to train more partners to gain more knowledge because currently, they are keeping a lot to themselves. For example, they are still keeping a lot of information on their campus, so information sharing is limited."
"The solution is expensive."
"We had some problems in the developer's environment. We had some problems with the initial installation environment."
"As a customer, you can't see the boot messages of your virtualized guest machines."
"Scalability is not straightforward."
"For the data migration, we used ZDM. It was not integrated with the databases, and the documentation lacks clarity."
"Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is stable, but the only problem occurs during OS patching. If you encounter issues, the VMC (virtual machine cluster) becomes unusable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There aren't any notable areas for improvement that I could see. PostgreSQL was self-sufficient with no need for additional database knowledge to maintain it."
"The pay-as-you-go pricing model plays a critical role in managing database-related costs and resource allocation. We build using Infrastructure as Code (IAC) and maintain a focus on FinOps to control Azure service costs. Some clients are pushy on price. It's critical to automate it, so we're just using it when appropriate and switching it off in certain scenarios."
"We do not pay for a full-year subscription because our usage is still at the beginning phase and not much. The pay-as-you-go model works well for us."
"The pricing experience is positive. Azure Database for PostgreSQL reduces the need for hardware investments, and the pay-as-you-go pricing model positively affects database-related costs by allowing us to start small and scale as needed."
"The machine and the cloud model itself already have licensing advantages."
"The price is too much."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Marketing Services Firm
12%
Educational Organization
8%
Financial Services Firm
32%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise16
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Database for PostgreSQL?
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Azure Database for PostgreSQL is positive; I appreciate it all. The pricing is very cost-effective and stable given that we have many data...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Azure Database for PostgreSQL?
Azure Database for PostgreSQL can be improved in ways I'm very curious to explore with Horizon. I'm interested in seeing how the fully enterprise-hardened features change things and where that blur...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Azure Database for PostgreSQL?
My main use cases for Azure Database for PostgreSQL came from a personal project to scratch an itch, and it was the easiest one to go grab. I appreciate how easy PostgreSQL is to get running locall...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?
The pricing is reasonable due to a universal agreement, which often positions Oracle solutions better against others. I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?
In future updates for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer, I would like to see another feature for the different costs for the non-CDB models, because if you are not using the non-CDB models, you have...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?
The use cases for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer are based on our actual solution. We have the Exadata, but it has reached its end of life. The X5 has attained the end of life, so we discussed mi...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Compared 22% of the time
MySQL vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
MySQL vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Compared 11% of the time
Amazon RDS vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
Amazon RDS vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Compared 10% of the time
PostgreSQL vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
PostgreSQL vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Compared 8% of the time
Percona Server vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL Logo
Percona Server vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL
Compared 4% of the time
More Azure Database for PostgreSQL Competitors
MongoDB Atlas vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Logo
MongoDB Atlas vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
Compared 20% of the time
Amazon RDS vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Logo
Amazon RDS vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
Compared 19% of the time
Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Logo
Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
Compared 15% of the time
Google Cloud SQL vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Logo
Google Cloud SQL vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Logo
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
Compared 4% of the time
More Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Azure Database for PostgreSQL
March 2026
Azure Database for PostgreSQL reportDownload Azure Database for PostgreSQL product report
Buyer's Guide
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
March 2026
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer reportDownload Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer product report
 

Overview

Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers efficient management, robust networking, and seamless Microsoft integration. Known for its strong performance and high satisfaction in enterprise settings, it provides operational efficiency, security, and monitoring.

With features that facilitate Azure integration, easy configuration, and AI integration, Azure Database for PostgreSQL serves as a valuable choice for businesses requiring operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Users benefit from powerful vector capabilities, seamless Microsoft service integration, straightforward management, and user authentication ensuring high satisfaction. Easy optimization, query analysis, and backup operations make it suitable for varied enterprise applications. However, improvements in flexible scaling, cost-effectiveness of monitoring tools, and enhanced integration with Azure OpenAI would enhance its capabilities further.

What Are the Key Features of Azure Database for PostgreSQL?
  • Robust Networking: Offers seamless Azure integration to optimize cloud resources.
  • AI Integration: Simplifies incorporating artificial intelligence into databases.
  • Monitoring Tools: Provides comprehensive tools for efficient database management.
  • Security: Ensures user data is protected with high-standard security protocols.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Delivers efficient operations with budget-friendly solutions.
What Benefits Should Users Consider?
  • Operational Efficiency: Streamlines database management tasks, reducing workload.
  • High Satisfaction: Receives positive feedback for its reliable performance in enterprises.
  • Enterprise Compatibility: Integrates across various Microsoft services for enhanced productivity.
  • User-Friendly Management: Facilitates straightforward database administration.
  • Scalability: Supports businesses with potential growth through flexible solutions.

Industries such as healthcare, retail, and finance leverage Azure Database for PostgreSQL for backend solutions, incident reporting, and public information sharing. Managed service providers utilize its strong performance for client needs, while administrators use it for applications like ControlM. Its flexibility supports containerized applications and disaster recovery, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments.

Microsoft

Oracle Cloud@Customer brings Oracle’s complete portfolio of public cloud infrastructure, fully managed cloud services, and Oracle Fusion SaaS applications into your data center. It enables you to run applications faster and lower your costs using the same high-performance capabilities, autonomous operations, and low-cost subscription pricing in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). You get all this while maintaining complete control of your data so you can address data residency, security, and connectivity concerns.

Oracle
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
IBVI, illycaffe, Scottish Water, trueblue, AirAsia, droptank
Buyer's Guide
Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
March 2026
Free Report: Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer report.
See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.