Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.7, while Oracle is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.0. Microsoft holds a 3.8% mindshare in DS, compared to Oracle’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Read 31 Azure Database for PostgreSQL reviews

8,794 Views
5,188 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...

Read 7 Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer reviews

1,834 Views
1,834 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer and Azure Database for PostgreSQL compete in the database solutions category, each offering unique advantages. Azure Database for PostgreSQL appears to have the upper hand in terms of scalability, cost-effectiveness, and integration within the Azure ecosystem, making it attractive for businesses seeking a flexible and managed service.

Features: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is tailored for high-performance Oracle database environments, featuring advanced data security, large-scale application support, and excellent Oracle workload optimization. Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers notable scalability, seamless integration with Azure services, and straightforward use of open-source PostgreSQL, combined with comprehensive monitoring and observing capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer could enhance its user experience by improving encryption capabilities and simplifying deployment expertise requirements. Azure Database for PostgreSQL could benefit from reduced costs for cloud execution, clearer version upgrade processes, and more comprehensive control over database configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer requires specialized expertise due to its sophisticated systems, though Oracle-specific support is strong. Azure Database for PostgreSQL excels with streamlined deployment and integration within Azure's infrastructure, benefiting from comprehensive Azure support services, providing ease for users seeking cloud-native solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer involves significant initial costs due to its specialized hardware, yet enterprises focused on Oracle-specific optimizations may find the ROI satisfactory. Azure Database for PostgreSQL presents a budget-friendly setup with flexible pricing models, offering better ROI for businesses favoring cost-effective and efficient cloud-native database solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (4th)

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Cus...

Ranking in Database as a Service (DBaaS)

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

4.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Database as a Service (DBaaS) category, the mindshare of Azure Database for PostgreSQL is 3.8%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is 3.1%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database as a Service (DBaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Database for PostgreSQL	3.8%
Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer	3.1%
Other	93.1%

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

Sathish Palanisamy

Staff Data Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Improves database performance, supports AI integration, and accelerates customer-focused innovation

Azure Database for PostgreSQL can be improved in the area of elastic capabilities. One of the things we were actively looking for is the elastic feature, which was made a GA at this Ignite event. I am really happy that finally in Azure, we have a product which we can use for elastic clusters. If you are bound with a single server, then you have a vertical limit. Now you do not have any limits. As long as your use case grows, we can grow. The only thing I would maybe be thinking about is we should also allow customers to pick different node sizes for every node inside the elastic eventually. Some nodes do not need that big capacity. So that may be a nice-to-have feature, though it is not a must-have at this point.

Read full review

WALID BOUHAJJA

Oracle DBS at Bpifrance

Positive experience with virtual cloud network creation and database migration highlights patching challenges

The best feature of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that it can be managed without needing only DBAs. We have many features, including the observability feature that helps check performance and generates numerous reports about performance. We have also implemented APIs, enabling us to create and perform many operations. This means we need DBAs who can work with APIs. We are autonomous in the patching process and don't need Oracle for patching. If you configure the process of patching, it will be executed automatically. We are using dynamic scaling which is implemented on an external virtual machine, helping us to downscale or upscale the CPU. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer has supported our organization's compliance and data sovereignty without problems. I have observed some limitations. For example, regarding encryption, though it is mandatory for Exadata Cloud at Customer, we cannot encrypt the database with external keys. Currently, with Exadata Cloud at Customer, using external keys is not possible.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The pay-as-you-go pricing model is one feature I truly appreciate."

"I would definitely recommend Azure Database for PostgreSQL because it has many advantages for modern applications and enterprise workloads, including its open-source nature reducing licensing costs, large community support, extensive ecosystem, and robust security, backup, and high availability features, resulting in a good balance of performance, scalability, security, and cost efficiency."

"In terms of integration, we already have SharePoint online, and we're starting to explore PowerApps and PowerFlow. It's all seamless. The ease of integrating SQL and licensing purposes plays a significant role, making it a comfortable choice for the organization."

"We transact 128 trillion data per month using Azure Database for PostgreSQL, which helps us to be more successful on every transaction that the customer is requesting from us."

"We use PostgreSQL to speed up application development. Our applications are ready sooner because we don't need to depend on other database teams."

"Compared to my previous expenses for maintaining an on-premise PostgreSQL database, Azure Database for PostgreSQL is far easier, far simpler, and far cheaper in my opinion."

"Azure Database for PostgreSQL has positively impacted my organization through collaboration by allowing me to generate a report within a second and send the MIS for an employee or a team, making it very easy to display for business purposes."

"Azure Database has become easier to use over time."

Cons

"In terms of improvement for Azure Database for PostgreSQL, the native applications can be enhanced, as we can use different tools to connect the database, but I believe the browser on the Azure portal can be made more user-friendly."

"Microsoft support has become less reliable due to AI responses, but with Azure Migration Assessment, we can plan migrations easily."

"Occasionally, we experience throughput issues due to bandwidth limitations of client setups with Azure, which have limited connections, but as far as the service itself goes, it has been rock solid."

"Support can certainly get better."

"Azure Database for PostgreSQL has not helped reduce infrastructure costs for me or my clients."

"We had to move to a CSP. This has been a significant challenge. We experienced trouble with our CSP and had to change CSPs because we could not get the level of support we needed from them."

"I would like to see improvements in Azure Database for PostgreSQL, such as more built-in performance tools, automated troubleshooting for complex performance issues, enhanced monitoring dashboards for faster root cause analysis, greater visibility, additional automation for scaling recommendations, and more integrated reporting capabilities."

"They can offer more RAG extensions. Currently, it only has the vector search. It does not presently support knowledge graph functionalities as Neo4j does. It also does not offer some tools to improve indexing the way other vector databases offer."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pay-as-you-go pricing model plays a critical role in managing database-related costs and resource allocation. We build using Infrastructure as Code (IAC) and maintain a focus on FinOps to control Azure service costs. Some clients are pushy on price. It's critical to automate it, so we're just using it when appropriate and switching it off in certain scenarios."

"We do not pay for a full-year subscription because our usage is still at the beginning phase and not much. The pay-as-you-go model works well for us."

"The pricing experience is positive. Azure Database for PostgreSQL reduces the need for hardware investments, and the pay-as-you-go pricing model positively affects database-related costs by allowing us to start small and scale as needed."

"There aren't any notable areas for improvement that I could see. PostgreSQL was self-sufficient with no need for additional database knowledge to maintain it."

"The machine and the cloud model itself already have licensing advantages."

"The price is too much."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service (DBaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

18%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

29%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Database for PostgreSQL?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that pricing is very important due to budget constraints in each project; while migration costs can be high during the process, after migrat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Database for PostgreSQL?

In terms of improvement for Azure Database for PostgreSQL, the native applications can be enhanced, as we can use different tools to connect the database, but I believe the browser on the Azure por...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Database for PostgreSQL?

My main use case for Azure Database for PostgreSQL involves migration from on-premise to Azure Database for PostgreSQL using technologies such as a migration database DMA. A specific example of a m...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

In future updates for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer, I would like to see another feature for the different costs for the non-CDB models, because if you are not using the non-CDB models, you have...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

The use cases for Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer are based on our actual solution. We have the Exadata, but it has reached its end of life. The X5 has attained the end of life, so we discussed mi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

My client is using Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer, not AWS Cloud or Amazon. For impact assessment of automated routine tasks, we are using our internal solution for backup, which is based on Comm...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon RDS vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compared 12% of the time

MySQL vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compared 10% of the time

PostgreSQL vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compared 7% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compared 6% of the time

More Azure Database for PostgreSQL Competitors

Amazon RDS vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 23% of the time

Oracle Database as a Service vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 14% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure SQL Database vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 10% of the time

Imply Enterprise vs Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Compared 3% of the time

More Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Database for PostgreSQL

October 2026

Download Azure Database for PostgreSQL product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

October 2026

Download Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer product report

Overview

Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers efficient management, robust networking, and seamless Microsoft integration. Known for its strong performance and high satisfaction in enterprise settings, it provides operational efficiency, security, and monitoring.

With features that facilitate Azure integration, easy configuration, and AI integration, Azure Database for PostgreSQL serves as a valuable choice for businesses requiring operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness. Users benefit from powerful vector capabilities, seamless Microsoft service integration, straightforward management, and user authentication ensuring high satisfaction. Easy optimization, query analysis, and backup operations make it suitable for varied enterprise applications. However, improvements in flexible scaling, cost-effectiveness of monitoring tools, and enhanced integration with Azure OpenAI would enhance its capabilities further.

What Are the Key Features of Azure Database for PostgreSQL?

Robust Networking: Offers seamless Azure integration to optimize cloud resources.
AI Integration: Simplifies incorporating artificial intelligence into databases.
Monitoring Tools: Provides comprehensive tools for efficient database management.
Security: Ensures user data is protected with high-standard security protocols.
Cost-Effectiveness: Delivers efficient operations with budget-friendly solutions.

What Benefits Should Users Consider?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines database management tasks, reducing workload.
High Satisfaction: Receives positive feedback for its reliable performance in enterprises.
Enterprise Compatibility: Integrates across various Microsoft services for enhanced productivity.
User-Friendly Management: Facilitates straightforward database administration.
Scalability: Supports businesses with potential growth through flexible solutions.

Industries such as healthcare, retail, and finance leverage Azure Database for PostgreSQL for backend solutions, incident reporting, and public information sharing. Managed service providers utilize its strong performance for client needs, while administrators use it for applications like ControlM. Its flexibility supports containerized applications and disaster recovery, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments.

Microsoft

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer optimizes backend performance and SQL query analysis. It offers scalable and observable infrastructure, ensuring reliable virtualization and licensing solutions tailored for on-premises management.

Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer bridges the gap between cloud capabilities and on-premises control, providing enhanced performance, security, and cost efficiency for managing critical data. Users enjoy Oracle-managed virtualization and support services while maintaining data sovereignty and compliance. Despite needing improvements in scalability and documentation, it remains a preferred choice for large databases requiring robust infrastructure.

What are the key features of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

Enhanced Performance: Optimizes SQL query analysis and backend capabilities.
Scalability & Observability: Dynamic scaling with extensive management tools.
Autonomous Patching: Simplifies maintenance with automated updates.
Oracle-managed Virtualization: Offers trusted and secure virtualization solutions.
Fault Tolerance: Ensures reliable infrastructure with advanced engineering.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer?

Cost Efficiency: Effective resource management compared to alternatives.
On-premises Control: Enables high-level control over critical data.
Security & Compliance: Supports data sovereignty with compliance features.
Performance Reliability: Delivers consistent high performance.

Financial institutions utilize Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer for migrating large databases while maintaining precise on-premises control. It provides a high-performance, secure solution compared to alternatives like AWS, enabling successful cross-platform migrations and efficient data management within data centers.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

IBVI, illycaffe, Scottish Water, trueblue, AirAsia, droptank

Buyer's Guide

Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

November 2026

Free Report: Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Database for PostgreSQL vs. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer report.

See our list of best Database as a Service (DBaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.