

Qlik Talend Cloud and Google Cloud Dataflow are major contenders in the data integration solutions category. Qlik Talend Cloud stands out in user satisfaction due to its pricing and support, while Google Cloud Dataflow excels in scalability thanks to its cloud-native design.
Features: Qlik Talend Cloud delivers comprehensive ETL capabilities, real-time data integration, and vast customization using Java, making it suitable for complex data needs. It provides a central metadata repository and robust data quality features for large enterprises. Google Cloud Dataflow utilizes Apache Beam's unified programming model, supporting both batch and stream processing with flexible language options. Its strong connectivity with Google services makes it appealing to those familiar with the Google ecosystem.
Room for Improvement: Qlik Talend Cloud faces issues with memory usage, stability, and documentation quality, leading to system crashes and memory problems. Access to technical support can also be inconsistent. Google Cloud Dataflow could enhance error logging, ease setup complexity, and improve configuration management.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Talend Cloud offers flexible deployment across on-premises, hybrid, and private cloud environments, though setup can be complex, particularly on hybrid systems. Google Cloud Dataflow simplifies deployment on public clouds and benefits from strong integration with other Google Cloud Platform tools. Customer service is generally positive for both, with Google Cloud Dataflow's support often considered more consistent in quality.
Pricing and ROI: Qlik Talend Cloud's open-source options reduce setup costs, and its annual licensing provides expense predictability. Users report significant time and cost savings, citing high ROI. Google Cloud Dataflow's pricing is resource and data volume-driven, making it cost-effective against other engines. Although pricing fluctuates, users value the lower expenses and report substantial returns on investment.
It has helped us save a lot of time by automating repetitive data processes and reducing manual interventions.
We achieved around 20% to 30% time savings in the ETL process, reduced operational errors, and improved pipeline stability.
We actually achieved the first 18 months worth of work in the first six months.
The fact that no interaction is needed shows their great support since I don't face issues.
Google's support team is good at resolving issues, especially with large data.
Whenever we have issues, we can consult with Google.
The support team is responsive when we raise issues, and they usually provide clear guidance or solutions.
I would rate the technical support from Talend Data Quality as an 8 or 9.
The customer support for Talend Data Integration is very good; whenever I raise a ticket in the customer portal, I immediately receive an email, and follow-up communication is prompt.
Google Cloud Dataflow has auto-scaling capabilities, allowing me to add different machine types based on pace and requirements.
As a team lead, I'm responsible for handling five to six applications, but Google Cloud Dataflow seems to handle our use case effectively.
Google Cloud Dataflow can handle large data processing for real-time streaming workloads as they grow, making it a good fit for our business.
By using features like job parallelization and modular design, we can expand our data flows without having to rebuild everything.
The scalability of Talend Data Integration is good; if it weren't scalable, it wouldn't be reliable.
Its scalability is good, as Qlik Talend Cloud can handle large amounts of data and grow as needed, especially in cloud environments.
I have not encountered any issues with the performance of Dataflow, as it is stable and backed by Google services.
The job we built has not failed once over six to seven months.
The automatic scaling feature helps maintain stability.
We have not encountered many issues with remote engines, and the interfaces are properly developed.
Once the jobs are properly designed and deployed, they run reliably without major issues.
Outside of Google Cloud Platform, it is problematic for others to use it and may require promotion as an actual technology.
Dealing with a huge volume of data causes failure due to array size.
I would like to see improvements in consistency and flexibility for schema design for NoSQL data stored in wide columns.
On the flip side, that is one of its amazing strengths, as you are not locked into a very rigid way of doing something.
It would be great to have more ready-to-use connectors for modern cloud and SaaS platforms.
Talend Data Integration can be improved by reducing the license cost, as it is a bit high compared to other tools, which can be a burden for small-scale companies wanting to buy a license.
It is part of a package received from Google, and they are not charging us too high.
My experience with Talend Data Integration's pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a bit higher compared to other tools, making it not very affordable.
The license cost has increased significantly, leading many companies to seek more profitable options in the market.
It supports multiple programming languages such as Java and Python, enabling flexibility without the need to learn something new.
The integration within Google Cloud Platform is very good.
Google Cloud Dataflow's features for event stream processing allow us to gain various insights like detecting real-time alerts.
By automating daily data loading processes, we reduced manual effort by around three or four hours per day, which saved roughly 60 to 80 hours per month.
We perform profiling prior to data quality and post-data quality, and based on that, we determine how much it has improved to measure the efficiency of Talend Data Quality cleaning tools.
The feature that has made the biggest difference for me in Qlik Talend Cloud is the scheduling and automation, which helps me run ETL jobs automatically without manual work.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Google Cloud Dataflow | 4.6% |
| Qlik Talend Cloud | 1.5% |
| Other | 93.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
Qlik Talend Cloud provides robust data integration tools tailored for efficient management of large volumes, offering real-time data access, Java integration, and custom code capabilities for developers.
Qlik Talend Cloud is known for its extensive connectivity options, enabling seamless integration across different platforms, such as S3, Redshift, Oracle, and SQL Server. The central repository facilitates consistent metadata access throughout organizations, enhancing collaboration. Despite its strengths in advanced monitoring, automation, and user-friendly drag-and-drop interfaces, users face challenges with installation stability, technical support, documentation inconsistencies, and complexities in learning. Performance concerns also include multitasking limitations and excessive memory usage. The platform's licensing costs can be prohibitive for smaller companies, while demands for improved data governance and intuitive code management continue. Its applications in healthcare data parsing, ETL task automation, and diverse data platform integration demonstrate its utility, although there's a constant demand for better scalability and efficient transformations.
What are the key features?In specialized industries like healthcare, users leverage Qlik Talend Cloud for data integration and transformation, aiding in compliance and analytics. Compatibility with cloud and on-premises systems ensures adaptability to complex data tasks, facilitating business application development. Organizations focus on enhanced data ingestion and quality checks for comprehensive solutions.
We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.