Google Cloud Bigtable vs Neo4j AuraDB comparison

Google and Neo4j are both solutions in the Managed NoSQL Databases category. Google is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.0, while Neo4j is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.9. Google holds a 5.2% mindshare in MND, compared to Neo4j’s 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Neo4j users who would recommend it.

Google Cloud Bigtable

Read 9 Google Cloud Bigtable reviews

776 Views
590 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Neo4j AuraDB

Read 8 Neo4j AuraDB reviews

634 Views
634 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Google Cloud Bigtable

Neo4j AuraDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 15, 2026

Google Cloud Bigtable and Neo4j AuraDB are both contenders in the data management domain, catering to diverse clientele needs. Neo4j AuraDB takes the lead with superior graph database capabilities, while Google Cloud Bigtable is more attractive for its cost-effective large-scale data solutions.

Features: Google Cloud Bigtable supports seamless integration with Google Cloud services and excels in processing large-scale data in real-time analytics. It offers low latency, enhances data transformation, and supports managed service for easy cloud transition. Neo4j AuraDB is designed for complex data relationships, provides advanced graph database features, and supports integrations with languages like Python and Java, making it ideal for network analysis and data discovery.

Room for Improvement: Google Cloud Bigtable could enhance its user interface to simplify data querying and visualization further. It may also improve integration with other non-Google services and offer more sophisticated graph database capabilities. Neo4j AuraDB could benefit from better communication regarding service lifecycle management, enhanced subscription handling to minimize confusion, and improved migration guidance with sufficient time frames to prevent data loss.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Cloud Bigtable offers easy deployment within the Google Cloud ecosystem, providing robust support for real-time data handling. Neo4j AuraDB enables straightforward graph data modeling and a user-friendly cloud deployment. It offers specialized support for optimizing graph-specific operations, although users may encounter challenges if not familiar with graph databases.

Pricing and ROI: Google Cloud Bigtable operates on a cost-effective pay-as-you-go pricing model, appealing for businesses with variable workloads. Neo4j AuraDB requires a higher investment but justifies the cost through enhanced insights in graph analysis, offering substantial ROI for data relationship-centric businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Neo4j AuraDB Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Neo4j AuraDB

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Bigtable

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (6th)

Neo4j AuraDB

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Managed NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Bigtable is 5.2%, down from 6.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Neo4j AuraDB is 5.3%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Neo4j AuraDB	5.3%
Google Cloud Bigtable	5.2%
Other	89.5%

Managed NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Akash Shanker

Team Lead at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Consistent performance and seamless cloud integration enhance analytics capabilities while reducing management complexity

One point for improvement in Google Cloud Bigtable is that people have confusion in mapping. There are many similar products available, and Google has managed services for similar products as well. It would be easier if the journey of knowing when to use Google Cloud Bigtable versus other Cloud SQL and alternates such as Cloud Spanner is made clearer for users. Regarding additional functionality for Google Cloud Bigtable, I am uncertain if LLMs can be integrated or if Google Cloud Bigtable can act as a vector store for LLM-specific use cases where we are interacting or using generative AI capabilities.

Read full review

Jeff Dalgliesh

Founder at data2

Room for improvement in interface capabilities while rapidly solving domain-specific problems

Neo4j AuraDB is a great tool for understanding connections between things. The best features Neo4j AuraDB offers are that it is easy to quickly build a solution with their tooling. Regarding the tooling, I love how fast it is that you can use NeoDash to quickly mock up a UI, and it is really nice that you can build a GraphQL endpoint to connect it to third-party applications, such as Retool or custom applications that we build for clients. Neo4j AuraDB has impacted my organization positively as it has helped me solve problems much more quickly. A specific example of a problem I solved more quickly with Neo4j AuraDB is that I was able to work with an LLM to build graph data models for domain-specific problems. The collaboration with the LLM and Neo4j AuraDB sped up my process as I'm building a tool on top of Neo4j that allows me to control how I can access data in the graph, and Neo4j had a nice interface that allowed us to work with their underlying data model.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is much more scalable than more traditional databases - at least the ones we are aware of."

"The main benefit I receive from Google Cloud Bigtable is the managed service part."

"Stability-wise, it is a simple solution. I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten."

"I like the drive and the support of this program."

"It's very user-friendly where streaming data is required."

"The main benefit I receive from Google Cloud Bigtable is the managed service part."

"Bigtable is faster than other competitors in the market. It helps us collate all the data, and the security features are great. The latency is low, and the computation speed is fantastic. Bigtable is also a managed service, so you don't have to worry about anything aside from analyzing the data ingested."

"The most valuable feature is the backup and replication service."

More Google Cloud Bigtable pros

"Integrating the front-end language with Neo4j AuraDB is a very easy process."

"I like the idea of graphs and nodes and the possibilities Neo4j AuraDB offers."

"The best features Neo4j AuraDB offers are that it is easy to quickly build a solution with their tooling."

"From my experience, I particularly like the professional version. Initially, developers often start with the free variant. Once the project grows, we switch to the professional version, which offers multiple databases, expanded memory, and better scalability. This allows us to handle more data and use cloud scaling features."

"The most beneficial things in terms of AuraDB are its speed, its good pricing, the multi-cloud availability."

"The tool is easy to use."

"The most valuable features of Neo4j AuraDB include its flexible data model and broad language support."

Cons

"This product needs better security and transparency, and the price should be reduced."

"The lagging problem of the product I face is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"I've used Bigtable for about three or four years."

"When it comes to complex queries, a user can't get any help from a drop-down box and pick columns. It would be great if some improvements could be made in the aforementioned area concerning the solution."

"The cost of this product is too expensive."

"The pricing of the solution needs to be improved."

"Improvement should be made as per customer recommended and requirements."

"In terms of AuraDB, the conversations have always been around scalability."

"I've experienced it crashing a few times, so stability could be better."

"Some features can help if they can visualize graphs better."

"During the product's initial setup phase, there were some issues due to disconnections in the tool's network."

"There’s room for improvement in Neo4j AuraDB, especially on the developer side. The learning curve can be steep, and the interface for developing and pushing code can be unnecessarily complex. It might be beneficial to simplify this process to help developers ramp up more quickly. Working with graph databases like Neo4j can be more challenging than standard databases, particularly for juniors and those new to graph technology. Streamlining the development process could make it easier for new users to get up to speed. This would be particularly useful for teams with less experience in graph databases. If I could add a feature to Neo4j AuraDB, I’d focus on improving the Bloom interface. It’s excellent for visualizing smaller datasets, but navigating through it becomes challenging as the data grows—say, past 100,000nodes. The interface works well for beginners but doesn’t scale effectively for more advanced users of large datasets. I want a UI that bridges the gap between the easy-to-use Bloom interface and more complex, text-based tools. This would help manage larger datasets more efficiently and improve performance."

"I would love to see a Retool type of interface builder with Neo4j AuraDB."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would like to see better pricing. It is not too expensive, but it isn't cheap either."

"I used the free tier."

"I am using an open-source version of Neo4j AuraDB."

"The tool's enterprise edition is very expensive."

"Neo4j AuraDB is reasonably priced, especially considering it removes the need for cloud administration and associated costs. It's a good deal for the professional version, as it includes managed services, which reduces the overhead compared to setting up your own infrastructure. The cost can be higher for enterprise-scale projects, but that's often due to the scale and complexity of the project rather than the product itself. Startups sometimes overestimate their needs and jump to enterprise pricing too quickly, leading to higher costs than necessary."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

33%

Educational Organization

11%

University

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud Bigtable?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Cloud Bigtable?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Google Cloud Bigtable?

My main use case for Google Cloud Bigtable is mainly for advertisement-related analytics-related use cases.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Neo4j AuraDB?

It has fair pricing.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Neo4j AuraDB?

My main use case for Neo4j AuraDB is solving water optimization problems for oil and gas operations. Neo4j AuraDB helps us resolve those water optimization problems by allowing us to store knowledg...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Neo4j AuraDB?

My advice to others looking into using Neo4j AuraDB is to consider how many graphs you can create as quickly as needed. I think Neo4j AuraDB is doing some amazing things. On a scale of 1-5, I rate ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Google Cloud Bigtable

Compared 25% of the time

Amazon DynamoDB vs Google Cloud Bigtable

Compared 18% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Google Cloud Bigtable

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon Keyspaces vs Google Cloud Bigtable

Compared 12% of the time

Timescale vs Google Cloud Bigtable

Compared 7% of the time

More Google Cloud Bigtable Competitors

Amazon Neptune vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 30% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 29% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 21% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 8% of the time

Google Cloud Firestore vs Neo4j AuraDB

Compared 7% of the time

More Neo4j AuraDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed NoSQL Databases

January 2026

Download Google Cloud Bigtable product report

Buyer's Guide

Neo4j AuraDB

January 2026

Download Neo4j AuraDB product report

Also Known As

Google BigTable

Neo4j Aura

Overview

Google Cloud Bigtable provides large data capacity, fast computation speed, and robust security for efficient data management. It supports seamless querying and integration, making it suitable for users transitioning to the cloud.

Google Cloud Bigtable is a managed service offering that facilitates efficient data handling through its high-performance capabilities and compatibility with other NoSQL databases. It is highly valued for its ability to manage and analyze large datasets, offering features like backup and replication, and is known for being faster than many competitors. Despite its strengths, users express concerns over its pricing, querying complexity, occasional performance lag, and difficulty in choosing between Bigtable and other services. There's also interest in its potential for integration with emerging technologies like LLMs for generative AI applications.

What are the key features of Google Cloud Bigtable?

Large Data Capacity: Supports immense volumes of data, essential for big data initiatives.
Seamless Querying: Queries large datasets with efficiency and speed.
Backup and Replication: Provides data reliability and easy recovery.
Low Latency: Ensures fast response times for queries and operations.
High Computation Speed: Offers rapid data processing capabilities.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Data Security: Provides robust security for sensitive data.
Ease of Analysis: Simplifies the process of collating and analyzing data.
Cloud Integration: Compatible with other NoSQL databases, aiding cloud transitions.
Fast Performance: Noted for being quicker than many alternatives.

Industries implement Google Cloud Bigtable for data management tasks such as managing large datasets, resolving production issues, and generating insights through dashboards. It is used in advertising analytics, client data evaluation in Power BI reports, and some automotive clients employ it for specialized needs, integrating business data into Google's ecosystem for efficient analysis.

Google

Neo4j AuraDB offers a flexible data model with extensive language integration and seamless multi-cloud accessibility. Known for scalability and performance, it supports efficient graph-based data handling across diverse applications.

Neo4j AuraDB is recognized for its comprehensive graph database capabilities, providing scalability, speed, and integration with multiple programming languages and tools. Its dedicated query language and AWS Cloud hosting enhance reliability and performance. While improvements in stability and GUI are necessary, its ability to handle graph data effectively aids in AI-driven projects and relationship-centric modeling. Researchers utilize it for cipher language studies and scalable databases, tackling diverse industry challenges.

What are the key features of Neo4j AuraDB?

Flexible Data Model: Adapts to varied workloads and requirements.
Broad Language Integration: Supports multiple programming languages for development versatility.
Multi-cloud Availability: Provides seamless deployment across different cloud platforms.
Graph-based Data Handling: Efficiently manages complex data relationships.
NeoDash Support: Facilitates quick application development with comprehensive tools.
Dedicated Query Language: Optimized for performance and reliability for graph queries.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating Neo4j AuraDB?

Scalability: Suitable for both small and large-scale graph database projects.
Performance: High-speed data processing for efficient application performance.
Reliability: AWS Cloud hosting ensures consistent uptime and security.
AI Integration: Provides contextual insights beneficial for data-driven initiatives.
Development Versatility: Supports a range of programming languages for diverse development needs.

Neo4j AuraDB is employed in industries like oil and gas, where companies address water optimization and construct knowledge graphs. It excels in relationship-centric modeling, handling structured and unstructured data for comprehensive insights, proving essential for graph-based reasoning in diverse applications.

Neo4j

Sample Customers

Cognite, Dow Jones, Loblaw Digital

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Neo4j AuraDB

December 2025

Free Report: Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Neo4j AuraDB

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Neo4j AuraDB and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Cloud Bigtable vs. Neo4j AuraDB report.

See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.