We performed a comparison between GitLab and Nolio Release Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Microsoft, Red Hat and others in Release Automation."The merging feature makes it easy later on for the deployment."
"The most valuable feature of GitLab is its security."
"I have had no problem with the stability of the solution."
"As a developer, this solution is useful as a repository holder because most of the POC projects that we have are on GitLab."
"CI/CD and GitLab scanning are the most valuable features."
"GitLab is kind of an image of GitHub, so it gives us the flexibility to monitor our changes in the repos."
"I have found the most valuable features of GitLab are the GitClone, GitPush, GitPull, GitMatch, GitMit, GitCommit, and GitStatus."
"I have found the most valuable feature is security control. I also like the branching and cloning software."
"The graphical view of when you're writing flow is the most valuable feature."
"The CA Application Insight feature is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"One standout aspect is its architecture. We can configure multiple instances on a single server using different system names or usernames."
"Some of the scripts that we encountered in GitLab were not fully functional and threw up errors."
"We would like to generate document pages from the sources."
"GitLab can improve the integration with third-party applications. It could be made easier. Additionally, having API control from my application could be helpful."
"The user interface could be more user-friendly. We do most of our operations through the website interface but it could be better."
"I rate the support from GitLab a four out of five."
"The price of GitLab could improve, it is high."
"Based on what I know so far, its integration with Kubernetes is not so good. We have to develop many things to make it work. We have to acquire third-party components to work with Kubernetes."
"GitLab could add a plugin to integrate with Kubernetes stuff."
"The configuration of the solution is a bit difficult to maneuver. They should work to make it easier."
"A concern with CA Release Automation is that Automic was acquired by CA recently. We're a bit concerned that CA strategy is going with Automic, that CA Release Automation is dead. They are not investing in it too much... They do say, that in the next two or three years we don't need to worry. They will still provide support for CA Release Automation. But we're not sure how CA Release Automation will evolve."
"When I started using Nolio around eight months ago, a challenge was the lack of relevant information and related support for learning."
"It could use better integration with development tools."
"In the next release, I would like to see more features to use active directory. And more rules to support more Python scripts and to work with Kubernetes and clouds, to have an easy solution for a lot of parameters."
GitLab is ranked 1st in Release Automation with 68 reviews while Nolio Release Automation is ranked 13th in Release Automation with 50 reviews. GitLab is rated 8.6, while Nolio Release Automation is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nolio Release Automation writes " Enables one-touch application deployment across various environments". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline, SonarQube and Tekton, whereas Nolio Release Automation is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Chef, UrbanCode Deploy and Automic Continuous Delivery Automation.
See our list of best Release Automation vendors.
We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.