We performed a comparison between GitHub and Venn Software based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I find GitHub very user friendly."
"GitHub provides good time reduction and this is what I value the most."
"The learning curve is small."
"The most valuable feature is the fact that it's cloud-based, and we don't have to manage an on-premises server to use it."
"It has a lot of features from the code development perspective. You get a lot of features such as repo, commit, merge, and branch. You can play around and do things on the fly. It is easy and simple to deploy. It is also easier to use when working from home."
"The initial setup was easy."
"GitHub allows us the option to push files from a non-UA method or directly upload files from the UA. You can integrate GitHub with Jenkins to do CI/CD."
"A great feature is being able to have different repositories and different kinds of projects in a single solution at a single time. It's just a click away."
"It allows us to improve our security and prevent company files and data leaks."
"We don't need to go to the physical office, and it only requires minimal supervision or assistance from our IT Team."
"Since the software is launched directly from the computer, not remotely delivered, it has minimized latency and response time."
"GitHub could expand the limits of the free version."
"We are not able to access GitHub from our VPN."
"The solution should have less integration with the AI part, but it needs to add features with other automation tools so that it can be easily integrated."
"It would be useful to have tutorial videos within the GitHub dashboard."
"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."
"The ticketing system is not working."
"Lacks sufficient support in terms of professional services that could be provided."
"If something has to be moved into approvals, and if they don't approve it in a few hours, then they should move the approval request to some other user, or they should have a way to escalate it."
"We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities."
"Currently, Venn only uses two platforms/applications: Windows and Mac. It would be great if they could also add more platforms since some BYOD employees might be using an application other than Windows or Mac - for example, Linux."
"It would be better to have the back end more efficient."
GitHub is ranked 13th in Application Security Tools with 64 reviews while Venn Software is ranked 28th in Application Security Tools with 3 reviews. GitHub is rated 8.6, while Venn Software is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Venn Software writes "Great for hybrid workers, minimizes latency and delivers great performance". GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, Atlassian SourceTree and Fortify on Demand, whereas Venn Software is most compared with Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) and Microsoft Intune. See our GitHub vs. Venn Software report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
