No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

GitGuardian Platform vs KELA Cyber comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (12th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (6th)
KELA Cyber
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (33rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

GitGuardian Platform and KELA Cyber aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. GitGuardian Platform is designed for Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) and holds a mindshare of 3.3%.
KELA Cyber, on the other hand, focuses on Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP), holds 1.1% mindshare, down 1.2% since last year.
Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
GitGuardian Platform3.3%
Astrix13.2%
Oasis11.0%
Other72.5%
Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM)
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
KELA Cyber1.1%
Recorded Future7.1%
CrowdStrike Falcon4.5%
Other87.3%
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
 

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Engineer at Deuna App
Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes
Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.
Use KELA Cyber?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) solutions are best for your needs.
886,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
13%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise16
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.
What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...
What is your primary use case for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
Our current use cases for GitGuardian Platform involve monitoring external and internal GitHub and GitLab, Bitbucket, and other code repositories that it supports for secrets.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring
KELA Group,RADARK
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.
Canadian Bank, US Corporate, Japanese Automobile Company
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, Astrix Security, Entro Security and others in Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM). Updated: March 2026.
886,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.