Genpact Cora SeQuence vs OpenText ProVision comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Genpact Logo
609 views|342 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
244 views|159 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Genpact Cora SeQuence and OpenText ProVision based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. OpenText ProVision Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good.""It is very stable. There is no downtime."

More Genpact Cora SeQuence Pros →

"The stability of the product is very good.""All the features come as part of a standard license.""OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."

More OpenText ProVision Pros →

Cons
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly.""The setup and configuration is complex."

More Genpact Cora SeQuence Cons →

"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful.""OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use.""Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."

More OpenText ProVision Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information.
Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use. In the next release, OpenText ProVision should combine intelligence capability with process modeling.
Ranking
Views
609
Comparisons
342
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
244
Comparisons
159
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
197
Rating
5.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Sequence BPM Suite, PNMsoft Sequence BPM Suite
Metastorm ProVision
Learn More
Overview
Sequence is a BPMS (Business Process Management Software) solution. Its development environment provides an environment for designing forms, tasks, messages, system integration, and flow connections. Sequence processes are, by default, operated from within a Microsoft SharePoint site. Sequence supports integration with Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services to enable managers to analyze performance and determine trends relating to KPIs and SLAs. In addition to integrating with Microsoft Office, SharePoint, and Dynamics products, it can be integrated with external systems through protocols such as web services, WCF. It also enables connection to enterprise applications such as SAP and Oracle. The product's architecture enables IT personnel to make changes to processes without taking them offline.
OpenText’s MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes
Sample Customers
South West Water, Atkins, Wolters Kluwer, Hazera Genetics, GeRAP, Aon Hewitt, Atos Origin, SwiftTrade
Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company11%
Financial Services Firm11%
Retailer10%
Wholesaler/Distributor9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Energy/Utilities Company17%
Financial Services Firm16%
Computer Software Company12%
Government8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise70%
Buyer's Guide
Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. OpenText ProVision
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. OpenText ProVision and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 39th in Business Process Management (BPM) while OpenText ProVision is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6, while OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Appian, Tungsten TotalAgility and Hubble, whereas OpenText ProVision is most compared with ARIS BPA, Visio, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our Genpact Cora SeQuence vs. OpenText ProVision report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.