• Home
  • Galvanize HighBond vs. SecurityScorecard

Galvanize HighBond vs SecurityScorecard comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Galvanize Logo

Galvanize HighBond

Read 3 Galvanize HighBond reviews
219 views|132 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SecurityScorecard Logo

SecurityScorecard

Read 4 SecurityScorecard reviews
2,190 views|1,250 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
IT Vendor Risk Management
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Galvanize HighBond and SecurityScorecard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, AuditBoard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Vendor Risk Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
WillWillis
Good automation and analytics, but is costly
Rob Hussey
Helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities
The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is automation."

More Galvanize HighBond Pros →

"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process.""One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements.""The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities.""With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."

More SecurityScorecard Pros →

Cons
"The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement."

More Galvanize HighBond Cons →

"They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product.""The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions.""There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for.""SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster."

More SecurityScorecard Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I give the cost of the solution a six out of ten."

    • More Galvanize HighBond Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing could be split into a lower-paid tier for smaller organizations and another higher tier for others with a more security-focused outlook. $1000 per month is more than some companies pay for their internet connections in total. UPDATE: they have a new 400$ a month tier for starters."
  • "Even though it's competitive, they offer flexible pricing structures."

    • More SecurityScorecard Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Galvanize HighBond?
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is automation.
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Galvanize HighBond?
    Top Answer:Regarding pricing, we are located in Africa where economic instability prevails and our currency continues to lose value due to inflation. The cost of the solution is high. I give the cost of the… more »
    What needs improvement with Galvanize HighBond?
    Top Answer:The report model was our main concern. I believe currently the solution uses a third party for the reporting. As part of a consulting firm, one of the challenges we face is the difficulty in producing… more »
    What do you like most about SecurityScorecard?
    Top Answer:I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What needs improvement with SecurityScorecard?
    Top Answer:SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster. As per the tool's SLAs, three days is way too much time for a user to wait for a response… more »
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for SecurityScorecard?
    Top Answer:This tool is a platform for monitoring and assessing the security posture of organizations and also helps to improve the posture by recommendations
    Read all 3 answers   →
    Ranking
    12th
    out of 36 in IT Vendor Risk Management
    Views
    219
    Comparisons
    132
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    489
    Rating
    7.0
    5th
    out of 36 in IT Vendor Risk Management
    Views
    2,190
    Comparisons
    1,250
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    700
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Rsam GRC, HighBond, HighBond by Galvanize
    Learn More
    Galvanize
    SecurityScorecard
    Overview
    Your GRC program is unique to your organization - and Rsam thinks it should stay that way. We give you control over what modules you want to implement and in what order. Deploy an out-of-the-box, turnkey baseline configuration that addresses your most urgent use case within 30 days and iterate from there. With Rsam, you can also easily customize the baseline configuration to meet your own unique needs. Iterate each step of the way until you reach 100% of your requirements. This keeps your implementation manageable and moving forward.

    Funded by world-class investors including Evolution Equity Partners, Silver Lake Partners, Sequoia Capital, GV, Riverwood Capital, and others, SecurityScorecard is the global leader in cybersecurity ratings with more than 12 million companies continuously rated. Founded in 2013 by security and risk experts Dr. Aleksandr Yampolskiy and Sam Kassoumeh, SecurityScorecard’s patented rating technology is used by over 25,000 organizations for enterprise risk management, third-party risk management, board reporting, due diligence, cyber insurance underwriting, and regulatory oversight. SecurityScorecard continues to make the world a safer place by transforming the way companies understand, improve and communicate cybersecurity risk to their boards, employees and vendors. Every organization has the universal right to their trusted and transparent Instant SecurityScorecard rating. For more information, visit securityscorecard.com or connect with us on LinkedIn.

    Sample Customers
    CNA Insurance
    TriNet, USAA, Zurich, Gilt Groupe, McGraw Hill Financial
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization43%
    Government8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Computer Software Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Educational Organization11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise48%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    IT Vendor Risk Management
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, AuditBoard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Galvanize HighBond is ranked 12th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 3 reviews while SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews. Galvanize HighBond is rated 8.6, while SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Galvanize HighBond writes "Good automation and analytics, but is costly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". Galvanize HighBond is most compared with ACL Analytics, RSA Archer and Workiva Wdesk, whereas SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Rapid7 InsightVM.

    See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

    We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.