Fujitsu vs NetApp E-Series comparison

Fujitsu and NetApp are both solutions in the NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays category. Fujitsu is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.0, while NetApp is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5. Fujitsu holds a 0.7% mindshare in N, compared to NetApp’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fujitsu users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Fujitsu and NetApp E-Series are competing products in the data storage market. Users tend to favor NetApp E-Series for its advanced features and overall performance, despite Fujitsu's attractive pricing and support options.

Features: Fujitsu offers excellent scalability, robust data protection mechanisms, and competitive pricing. NetApp E-Series provides high-speed performance, substantial storage capacity, and impressive integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fujitsu offers a straightforward deployment model and reliable customer service, simplifying the process for users. NetApp E-Series has a more complex deployment process but compensates with excellent customer service and support.

Pricing and ROI: Fujitsu is known for its lower setup costs, making it an attractive option for budget-sensitive buyers. In contrast, NetApp E-Series involves a higher initial investment, offering substantial ROI due to its superior performance and feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Fujitsu vs. NetApp E-Series Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fujitsu vs. NetApp E-Series

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,711 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays category, the mindshare of Pure FlashArray X NVMe is 4.0%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fujitsu is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp E-Series is 2.9%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Pure FlashArray X NVMe	4.0%
NetApp E-Series	2.9%
Fujitsu	0.7%
Other	92.4%

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

Featured Reviews

Jaehoon Oh

Chief Technology Officer at Lambda256

Supports efficient storage management through volume snapshots and offers reliable non-disruptive upgrades

I have no specific improvements to suggest for Pure FlashArray X NVMe at this time. The performance statistics could be enhanced. I can see the performance statistics in the Pure Storage console, but it does not show the performance by 4K byte unit. It displays IOPS and bandwidth, but IOPS is about real use, and I want to know how many IOPS are currently running in 4K byte units. I cannot see that IOPS because most storage systems report their performance by 4K byte unit. I want to see Pure Storage performance by 4K byte unit to compare with other storage or other internal NVMe SSD.

Read full review

Alexander Kühn

Senior Project Manager Varna Information Technology / Owner at Varna Informationstechnology EOOD

Easy to use, but price is an area that needs to be improved

The question you have to ask yourself these days would be whether you need classical SAN storage or do you want to go with a modern approach like SaaS-based storage. If you want classical storage, Fujitsu is still a good product. If you want to be safer and work with off the shelf hardware,then go with NetApp. Don't pay the markup price charged by big storage vendors. My company has not faced any issues with the product's integration capabilities. The tool is basically used as a block device, so it's quite easy and simple at what it does. I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Milan Budimir

IT-Techniker at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Have struggled with timely expert support and faced communication challenges during critical maintenance tasks

As an AZ3 technician with experience in that direction, when I call them, I do not call the first-level support as it is something I do not need. I call them because I am not able to resolve that mistake or when the behavior of the machine is not normal. If you need an auto support message from the customer machine, you can get them from the first level, but most of the time, they do not know what an auto support message is, and everything stops there. You have a few of them when you call, and when we are replacing something in NetApp E-Series. StorageGRID is different, but with NetApp E-Series, you need to grab information from the node that is actually down; in most cases, the node is not in loader. It is entirely gone. You can try to reseat it, maybe boot it up, but in most cases, when it is down, it stays down. You call support for that, and that is when you lose two or three hours.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ease of use."

"It has benefited my organization because it has reduced time to insights."

"Overall stability is very good. It is a very stable solution."

"Offers excellent features like efficient data reduction, a reliable SafeMode, and a great support model for continuous assistance and updates."

"It has good, reliable, fast storage."

"The database workloads are pretty fast because I frequently move data from here to there."

"The Pure1 component is most valuable at this point in time when comparing it with EMC. Pure1 is where you can have your diagnostics in the cloud, so you can look at things from your mobile phone."

"Pure FlashArray X NVMe helps to improve our processing speed. It is user-friendly and easy to use."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe pros

"The solution's most valuable features stem from the DX series and the all-flash storage system."

"It stands out for its affordability and the ability to provide unified storage."

"The Snapshot feature is actually widely used; it is a feature that only NetApp E-Series has and it is quite good."

"The overall experience has been positive."

"My customers are satisfied with the performance."

"Customers go for the E Series if they need backup storage because it is cheap."

"If we select the best use case for NetApp E-Series based on its intended purpose, I would rate it a ten."

"The product is easy to use."

Cons

"Adding some functions to the product would be beneficial."

"One point I'd like to improve is that the tool should start selling small boxes again. It discontinued some products and is focusing on bigger, more capable boxes, neglecting the SMB market. Even though it's not a big market, it shouldn't have removed them."

"In terms of what needs improvement, the dashboard and management could be simplified."

"Our use cases require more multi-tenant capabilities and additional VLAN interfaces for separating different customers. We currently use it to provide storage, sometimes shared storage, to different customers, but it is less flexible in comparison to a dedicated solution."

"The tool's pricing is higher than competitors."

"You cannot tag a LUN with a description, and that should be improved. What I like on the Unity side is that when I expand LUNs or do things, there is an information field on the LUN. This is the Information field that you can tag on your LUNs to let yourself know, "Hey, I've added this much space on this date". Pure lacks that ability. So, you don't have a mechanism that's friendly for tracking your data expansions on the LUN and for adding any additional information. That's a downside for me."

"In the future, I would like to see integration with enterprise backup systems."

"They could add more support for file storage and different types of storage."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe cons

"The product's prices are an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The graphical interface is somewhat lacking, and it doesn't cover all the necessary tasks, often requiring users to resort to the command line for completion."

"Though the performance is there, if NetApp wants to be competitive with the others, it must improve their business continuity."

"The solution must provide more training courses."

"NetApp should add more production lines to the E series so we can make flexible solutions more easily."

"Getting through first level to second level takes two hours minimum."

"Regarding error handling in NetApp E-Series, because it is a cost-effective but not an intelligent storage solution, the error handling is not sufficient."

"With NetApp E-Series, when we are running active-active NAS4, sometimes due to either an issue or a bug, we experience failures. At least twice yearly, we have seen this issue. When it occurs, we lose critical systems such as MQ."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price could be better. It is not too expensive, but it is the high-end cost. It is kind of a Rolls-Royce. You pay a lot, but you get a lot out of it. So, the price pressure on the way down would be great, but at the end of the day, if you need to do the work, you just pay for it."

"With VMware, we pay $300,000 annually."

"Our licensing fees are $500,000+ USD."

"Pure FlashArray X NVMe’s pricing is cheaper than other products."

"The tool's pricing is cheap; I rate it a six to seven out of ten. Most of our sales are not subscription-based. We sell the hardware, and customers keep using it. They only renew the service part annually. The support can be a bit pricey, but the solution is more cost-effective than anything else out there."

"We pay approximately $50,000 USD per year in licensing fees."

"With Pure Storage, we would like to continue seeing price reductions with flash storage. I don't think we're any different than anybody else when we continue to look to the industry for price reductions of both NVMe and traditional SSD storage. We would like to see these prices continue to decline and erode, even displacing large spinning disks."

"They can tout the functionality and cutting edge technology that they have, but that's where the price tag comes in. The cost is high, but I think as they grow their business and get more customers that it will probably go down a little bit."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe pricing and cost advice

"There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"The entry-level midrange model from Fujitsu is cost-effective for our target market"

"The price is reasonable for NetApp E-Series."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

No data available

Manufacturing Company

21%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

Pure FlashArray X NVMe helps to improve our processing speed. It is user-friendly and easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

The price of Pure FlashArray X NVMe is very expensive, though I do not know the actual price because I am using the E...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

I have no specific improvements to suggest for Pure FlashArray X NVMe at this time. The performance statistics could ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fujitsu?

There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fujitsu?

In terms of Fujitsu, the classical storage systems are going to be obsolete in my point of view. With SaaS storage to...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fujitsu?

I use the solution in my company to run the VM clusters with Fujitsu's database, as well as everything else we have i...

See all answers

What do you like most about NetApp E-Series?

The product is easy to use.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp E-Series?

Regarding scalability, I think there is no problem. While there is always room for improvement in any product, to my ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetApp E-Series?

We sell NetApp E-Series as engineered machines like FlexPod, which is used where high throughput and native storage p...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerStore vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 19% of the time

Dell PowerMax vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 13% of the time

TrueNAS R-Series vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 11% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 9% of the time

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 8% of the time

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe Competitors

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs Fujitsu

Compared 100% of the time

More Fujitsu Competitors

Seagate Exos X Series vs NetApp E-Series

Compared 24% of the time

NetApp ASA vs NetApp E-Series

Compared 22% of the time

NetApp AFF vs NetApp E-Series

Compared 17% of the time

TrueNAS R-Series vs NetApp E-Series

Compared 11% of the time

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs NetApp E-Series

Compared 11% of the time

More NetApp E-Series Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

December 2025

Download Pure FlashArray X NVMe product report

Buyer's Guide

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

December 2025

Download Fujitsu product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp E-Series

December 2025

Download NetApp E-Series product report

Also Known As

Pure FlashArray//X NVMe, Pure FlashArray//X, FlashArray//X

No data available

Overview

Pure Storage FlashArray//X is the world’s first enterprise-class, all-NVMe flash storage array. It represents a new class of storage – shared accelerated storage, which is a term coined by Gartner – that delivers major breakthroughs in performance, simplicity, and consolidation.

Pure Storage

Fujitsu offers advanced technological solutions tailored to industry-specific demands. Recognized for robust performance and reliability, it facilitates a wide range of applications, providing users with flexibility and enhanced productivity across different sectors.

Fujitsu stands out as a leader in technology, integrating cutting-edge innovations that drive efficiency and elevate performance. Its offerings cover diverse areas, ensuring adaptability and seamless integration. Users benefit from its comprehensive approach, which combines state-of-the-art features with user-focused enhancements, addressing needs such as scalability and security.

What are the most important features of Fujitsu?

Scalability: Fujitsu allows for flexible scaling to address varying demands.
Security: Incorporates strong security protocols to protect data and systems.
Reliability: Known for dependable performance in demanding environments.
Flexibility: Supports diverse applications and integrates smoothly with existing setups.

What benefits or ROI can Fujitsu provide?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines processes to save time and resources.
Cost Reduction: Lowers operational costs through optimized resource use.
Enhanced Productivity: Facilitates uninterrupted workflows, boosting output.
Data Protection: Offers robust measures for safeguarding sensitive information.

Fujitsu finds applications in industries such as healthcare, finance, and manufacturing, where its adaptability and security features are critical. In healthcare, its technology supports patient data management and operational efficiency. In finance, it ensures secure transactions, while in manufacturing, it enhances workflow processes and data analysis capabilities.

Fujitsu

NetApp E-Series offers a flexible, high-performance storage solution ideal for handling intensive data requirements. Designed to optimize capacity and improve data availability, it supports diverse sector needs.

NetApp E-Series is a purpose-built system engineered to deliver fast, consistent performance. It is best utilized in environments requiring high-performance workloads where speed and efficiency are crucial. Users appreciate its reliability and scalability, which contribute to effective data management. The system is known for its efficient storage capabilities, providing robust data protection and seamless integration with existing infrastructure.

What are the key features of NetApp E-Series?

Scalability: Supports expansion to accommodate growing data needs seamlessly.
Performance: Delivers high-speed processing for demanding applications.
Integrations: Easily integrates with existing IT environments, enhancing operational efficiency.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Cost Efficiency: Offers competitive pricing with long-term savings through energy-efficient designs.
Reliability: Provides consistent uptime, minimizing disruptions and improving productivity.
Flexibility: Versatile deployment options cater to specific performance and capacity requirements.

NetApp E-Series is widely implemented across industries ranging from healthcare to finance, where it supports critical data-intensive applications. Its deployment in environments such as scientific research and media production highlights its capacity for handling high-speed data access and reliable performance.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Fremont Bank, Judson ISD, The Nielsen Company

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Fujitsu vs. NetApp E-Series

December 2025

Free Report: Fujitsu vs. NetApp E-Series

Find out what your peers are saying about Fujitsu vs. NetApp E-Series and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fujitsu vs. NetApp E-Series report.

See our list of best NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays vendors.

We monitor all NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.