Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs Rapid7 Metasploit comparison

Fortra and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Fortra is ranked #58, while Rapid7 is ranked #24 with an average rating of 9.3. Fortra holds a 0.7% mindshare in VM, compared to Rapid7’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 60% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Fortra Tripwire IP360

Read 6 Fortra Tripwire IP360 reviews

1,492 Views
1,149 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

Rapid7 Metasploit

Read 22 Rapid7 Metasploit reviews

5,395 Views
4,802 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Fortra Tripwire IP360

Rapid7 Metasploit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Fortra Tripwire IP360 and Rapid7 Metasploit are competitors in the cybersecurity landscape, focusing on vulnerability management. Rapid7 Metasploit appears to maintain an edge in feature innovation due to its advanced penetration testing tools, whereas Fortra Tripwire IP360 is preferred for its comprehensive asset scanning and threat intelligence integration.

Features: Fortra Tripwire IP360 provides robust asset discovery, vulnerability prioritization, and threat intelligence integration across networks. Rapid7 Metasploit offers advanced penetration testing tools, extensive exploit libraries, and custom scripting capabilities that enhance adaptability.

Room for Improvement: Fortra Tripwire IP360 could improve in setup simplification, user interface intuitiveness, and integration ease with third-party security tools. Rapid7 Metasploit may benefit from expanding its threat intelligence insights, enhancing asset discovery features, and refining reporting capabilities for clearer visibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Rapid7 Metasploit is known for straightforward setup and strong community support, providing resources for troubleshooting and optimization. Fortra Tripwire IP360 comes with a steeper learning curve but has dedicated customer service for guided deployment and maintenance.

Pricing and ROI: Fortra Tripwire IP360's premium pricing reflects its in-depth vulnerability analysis capabilities with a high ROI through risk reduction. Rapid7 Metasploit offers competitive pricing with flexible subscription models, balancing cost and actionable security insights, appealing to cost-conscious clients seeking immediate value.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortra Tripwire IP360

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

58th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Rapid7 Metasploit

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

24th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Fortra Tripwire IP360 is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 Metasploit is 1.9%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Rapid7 Metasploit	1.9%
Fortra Tripwire IP360	0.7%
Other	97.4%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Corey Cole

Service Coordinator - Technology Security at a government with 10,001+ employees

The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain

Only the administrator was using the product. He used it to read reports as part of our compliance programs. It wasn't heavily used by a lot of users. The tool comes in at a large scale, and we tried to scale it down. The scaling did not apply to us. It was neither difficult nor easy. I rate the scalability a five out of ten. We had some challenges while scaling it down. It could do 10,000 devices, and we wanted to use it for ten devices. The process was difficult and expensive. We did not need the product anymore.

Read full review

reviewer1247523

Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Extensive exploit database and seamless integration enhance penetration testing capabilities

The automated approach in the audits or in the hacking testing with Rapid7 Metasploit could be improved because even the same attack you provide today will go in different ways another day. I prefer when the auditor or pen-tester provides the attack in a non-automated mode. For some, it might be a valuable option, but I'm not sure it's valuable for us, as after the attack has been provided, we should release a report detailing how it transpired and what the customer should improve to block this way of attack. If the attack was provided in an automated mode, you cannot receive sufficient information that helps with this final report for the customer. While you can check the vulnerability, and the system will tell you there is no vulnerability, usually, a human can change one, two, or three parameters and using the same technique and the same scripts can break the system. Rapid7 Metasploit could be improved in areas concerning the experience with finding particular scripts pre-installed in the solution. Customers, administrators, and pen-testers spend considerable time trying to locate the specific component they need by the name of the technique or the name of the attack, so any improvements in making it easier to find those predefined components by name or timeframe would be beneficial. Search filters could be a correct improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Tripwire is one of the most mature in terms of companies, suites, support, everything, much more than any other product."

"The company probably chose this solution because they thought that they would be getting the best bang for their buck."

"This product detects vulnerabilities which exist in the environment, and provides enough information that allows for remediation, thereby securing the environment."

"Tripwire IP360 helps me to discover most of the vulnerabilities, and I like the way that it prioritizes these vulnerabilities, as it allows me to focus on the most important ones first and then follow up with the rest."

"We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."

"It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."

"Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."

"It has enhanced the security program by ensuring that all external-facing systems are scanned on a routine basis."

"The search engine is actually pretty cool, it allows you to search the vulnerability very fast, and the big difference is that the exploit you see on Metasploit has been tested and imported, it's going to work and it is not going to crash anything."

"The option to generate phishing emails has proven to be very valuable in understanding the behavior of users."

"When I compare Metasploit with Nessus, I find that Metasploit is faster and it does not burden the system as much."

"The most valuable feature for us is the support for testing Linux-based web server components."

"All of the features are great."

"Technical support is very good; whenever we need assistance, they are quite helpful and responsive."

"It is easy to use, a useful product, and it has a very long list of available payloads."

"I use Rapid7 Metasploit for payload generation and Post-Exploitation."

More Rapid7 Metasploit pros

Cons

"The reporting functions can use improvement."

"I am not very impressed by the technical support."

"For IP360, unfortunately, scans for certain vulnerabilities often cause issues, as they are mainly false positive."

"We would like to have better reporting capabilities and for them to be more granular."

"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."

"If you are looking for better reporting capabilities and vulnerability tracking over time for remediation purposes, then this is not the best solution."

"I am not very impressed by the technical support."

"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."

"The reporting feature needs improvement."

"Integration with popular vulnerability scanners would be a useful feature."

"The solution is not very scalable, it does not provide any automation to be able to scale it."

"The open-source version has reporting limitations. You need to develop these capabilities yourself. Built-in reporting is an excellent feature for penetration testing, but it isn't a must-have. The solution could also cover more vulnerabilities. Metasploit has around 10,000 exploits in its library, but more is always better."

"Rapid7 Metasploit can add a GUI feature because it is only available online."

"Support is another area where improvement is needed, particularly for assisting non-security users."

"It is necessary to add some training materials and a tutorial for beginners."

More Rapid7 Metasploit cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe the price compares well within the market."

"The product was expensive for us."

"I have used the free version of Rapid7 Metasploit."

"The cost is approximately $15 per device."

"It is expensive. Our license expired, and our company is not thinking to renew because of our budget."

"The pricing structure involves a one-time purchase cost of approximately twenty thousand dollars or euros for all customers."

"The great advantage with Rapid7 Metasploit, of course, is that it's free."

"Rapid7 Metasploit is cheaper than Tenable.io Vulnerability Management."

"There are two versions available, one of which is the Pro version, and the other is the free version."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product's pricing a six. So it's fairly priced."

More Rapid7 Metasploit pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 Metasploit?

The pricing of Rapid7 Metasploit is quite affordable. It has a free version that many customers start with, and after that, they usually purchase the commercial part of the solution due to its deep...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 Metasploit?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 Metasploit?

I use Rapid7 Metasploit as a distributor, as an integrator, and as a user. I use Rapid7 Metasploit in my company internally as a part of providing internal audit.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tenable Nessus vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 10% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 7% of the time

BMC Helix Automation Console vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 5% of the time

More Fortra Tripwire IP360 Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 8% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 8% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 6% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 6% of the time

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 5% of the time

More Rapid7 Metasploit Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360

May 2026

Download Fortra Tripwire IP360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 Metasploit

April 2026

Download Rapid7 Metasploit product report

Also Known As

IP360

Metasploit

Overview

Tripwire IP360 is a powerful vulnerability management solution that identifies and prioritizes network vulnerabilities for remediation. It is highly effective in scanning devices and applications, improving security posture, ensuring compliance, and managing risks.

Users value its detailed reporting, user-friendly interface, and seamless integration with other security tools for efficient security management.

Fortra

Rapid7 Metasploit provides robust exploitation capabilities, vulnerability assessment, and seamless integration with InsightVM, enhancing penetration testing and security awareness.

Rapid7 Metasploit stands out in the cybersecurity sphere for its extensive exploit modules and automated testing processes. It supports multiple interfaces and databases, simplifying exploit development and facilitating network scanning through integration with Nmap. Its emphasis on vulnerability discovery and incident detection positions it as a key tool in various IT environments, despite limitations in GUI effectiveness and exploit update speeds.

What are the key features of Rapid7 Metasploit?

Exploitation Capabilities: Offers a vast array of exploit modules for advanced penetration testing.
Automation: Streamlines testing processes, ensuring efficient workflow.
Integration: Works with tools like Nmap for enhanced network scanning.
Open Source: Leverages extensive user contributions for diverse payload options.
User Interface: Intuitive design assists in phishing email generation and testing.

What benefits can users expect from Rapid7 Metasploit?

Comprehensive Testing: Enables thorough vulnerability assessments across environments.
Incident Detection: Facilitates early identification and response to security threats.
Efficiency: Automates redundant tasks, reducing manual effort.
Insightful Reporting: Provides detailed analysis for informed decision-making.

In industries such as government and education, Rapid7 Metasploit integrates into security protocols and training programs. Its deployment on platforms like Kali Linux aligns with IP assets for effective scanning and phishing detection. Organizations benefit from its ability to track processes and collaborate securely with entities, enhancing overall cybersecurity readiness.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

1. Aetna 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. AIG 5. Airbus 6. Akamai 7. Amazon 8. American Express 9. Aon 10. Apple 11. ATT 12. Autodesk 13. Bank of America 14. Barclays 15. Bayer 16. Bechtel 17. BlackRock 18. Boeing 19. BNP Paribas 20. Cisco 21. CocaCola 22. Comcast 23. Dell 24. Deutsche Bank 25. eBay 26. ExxonMobil 27. FedEx 28. Ford 29. General Electric 30. Google 31. HP 32. IBM

City of Corpus Christi, Diebold, Lumenate, Nebraska Public Power District, Prairie North Regional Health, Apptio, Automation Direct, Bob's Stores, Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions, Carnegie Mellon University

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

April 2026

Free Report: Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Rapid7 Metasploit and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Rapid7 Metasploit report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.