We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiToken and Keeper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."We like the mobile FortiToken."
"Fortinet FortiToken is used for double factor authentication."
"The initial setup is easy. You receive a QR code via email, scan it, and add it. No complicated procedures involved."
"Bangladesh is a price-sensitive market, and FortiToken is popular because it's more affordable than the Palo Alto and Cisco authentication solutions. Fortinet has a local director for Bangladesh, so they can deliver solutions to customers quickly."
"Its ease of use is most valuable. It is simple to use and can be deployed out-of-the-box. It is quite a mature product with all the required features."
"I appreciate that it provides comprehensive security. It is tailored to this specific purpose, and it excels in fulfilling this purpose."
"The integrated Fortinet security with the app that allows you to easily do the two-factor authentication is most valuable."
"FortiToken is available in a soft or hard token factor, so there's some flexibility in that. Beyond that, I would say it is a stable solution that has worked for us."
"It syncs with all devices and supports all platforms."
"It is very easy to use, intuitive, and cost effective."
"Auto login across platforms allows for no copying and pasting."
"The ability to autofill the login credentials has saved me a lot of time in my day to day computing."
"The chat support is quick. I have never encountered any problems. On the contrary, they have been very helpful and kind."
"The generator of complex passwords keeps me safe from being hacked."
"Stronger passwords are being used across the board in our organization."
"Can create folders for specific types of information (i.e., work, personal, and school)."
"Fortinet support has some room for improvement. It has taken a long time to resolve some issues or find a workaround."
"I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten. The migration issue definitely brings it down a bit."
"You need your mobile just to enroll the tokens, and sometimes, it's difficult to use for someone who is not knowledgeable"
"Configuration can be confusing due to the lack of community and context-sensitive help. We've had to rely on technical support, which slows down the setup process."
"It needs a lot of coupling with their other Fortinet products. To implement FortiToken, I most probably need to couple it with FortiAuthenticator for full implementation. An RSA token can be used with many devices, whereas Fortinet FortiToken is always linked to only one FortiGate device. If I want to reuse the token across five or six FortiGates, I would have to get the FortiAuthenticator product. I can't use one token to connect to different FortiGates, and I need to get another product to enable this functionality. They should also improve the support for their mobile client. There should be a more detailed roadmap for the operating systems being supported. Some of our users were using an old iOS iPhone, and they were forced to get a newer phone because FortiToken didn't support that version of iOS. Similarly, there may be a version of Android that is not supported, so the users need to change the phone. This was one of the reasons why our deployment took longer."
"The problem is that our customers create budgets annually based on the figures at the beginning of the fiscal year. Our customers get annoyed when the price is adjusted in the middle of the year. I understand that it's a difficult time, and price increases make sense for hardware devices. However, FortiToken is a software product, so it shouldn't be affected by factors like chip shortages or supply chain issues. Software solutions should have more transparent and predictable pricing."
"Fortinet FortiToken could be lower for some markets."
"The app could be improved so that you don't have to actually type in the code. It would be great if you can just do a prompt or push similar to the way Duo does."
"The technical support for this solution could be faster support and improved if they had a better understanding of my questions."
"Search functions are sometimes weird."
"API possible needs improvement. Although, this feature is for enterprises which need more then the usual usage."
"Ability to set up password profiles that can predefine custom fields and password complexity."
"I would add a category for personal documents or photos of ID cards."
"If you purchase the premium, then after the subscription expires, you cannot edit your passwords any longer, even if you could before you purchased the paid subscription."
"Needs to improve KeeperFill on iOS."
"Its aesthetic needs improvement."
Fortinet FortiToken is ranked 4th in Authentication Systems with 20 reviews while Keeper is ranked 10th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews. Fortinet FortiToken is rated 8.2, while Keeper is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiToken writes "A stable and scalable solution that provides an affordable and perpetual license". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". Fortinet FortiToken is most compared with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Microsoft Entra ID, Cisco Duo, Yubico YubiKey and RSA Authentication Manager, whereas Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, LastPass and NordPass.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
